opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Froma Harrop
Froma Harrop
9 Feb 2016
Our Love-Hate Relationship With Valentine's Day

Valentine's Day is upon us. And to think we are still recuperating from Groundhog Day. That's February for you,… Read More.

4 Feb 2016
And the Oscar for Most Stunning Actress Goes to ...

We are here not to discuss the complex #OscarsSoWhite controversy but to address another sore point with … Read More.

2 Feb 2016
Government Keeps Rural West Going

The 187,000 acres on which sits the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge never belonged to the state of Oregon, … Read More.

Liberal Elite to Blame for Working-class Woes???


The white working class is in big trouble, and the liberal elite is largely to blame. So says Charles Murray in his latest book, "Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010." As a scholar at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, and this being an election year, wouldn't he just.

A new report shows that over half of childbirths by women under 30 are out of wedlock, with the white percentage rising fastest. This is a disturbing trend. And in whose gut does Murray jab the finger of fault? Into that of college grads, who overwhelmingly do bear children within the confines of marriage. Murray concentrates his wrath on a fictional professor at Columbia University.

As Murray explains, the prof and his ilk look down on the white folk who patronize McDonald's and watch TV shows not on PBS. Worse of all, they don't loudly condemn them for having children without marriage.

"If you are of a conspiratorial cast of mind," Murray writes (perhaps to distance himself from the ludicrous thought to follow), "nonjudgmentalism looks suspiciously like the new upper class keeping the good stuff to itself." This privileged group, he goes on, "refuses to let anyone else in on the secret" that marriage is the desirable social state.

I have an idea. Have the Ivy professors each call 10 blue-collar guys currently cohabiting with their girlfriends and children. The academics can then lecture them on the benefits of marriage and point to the error of their ways. That should go over big.

Murray industriously studies where the rich liberals live, zeroing in on certain affluent corners of Washington, D.C., Manhattan and San Francisco — of course. He maps where graduates of Harvard, Yale and Princeton reside, and does a "secondary database" of schools just below that exalted level.

Wesleyan University, he tells us, is a good school but "not at the summit." (Gosh, can't a girl from NYU play?)

The more densely a zip code is populated by graduates of elite colleges, he writes, "the more densely it is populated by overeducated elitist snobs." Further, these "SuperZips" are surrounded by "elite bubbles" that allegedly buffer the Wine Advocate subscribers from the Pabst Blue Ribbon crowd.

A few problems here. Murray is talking about tiny urban zip codes. The little island of Manhattan has 41 zip codes. (By contrast, one zip in Nevada, 89049, is bigger than Connecticut.) Uptown millionaires sit next to janitors on the subway ride to Wall Street. There's no faster way, short of strapping on a rocket backpack and lighting the fuse.

Let's consider the possibility that the decline of marriage among the working class is at least partly tied to collapsing incomes that make the fellows less desirable as permanent mates. Conservatives will further argue that government programs may discourage marriage. And true, cohabiting parents often say that marriage would raise the official household income to the point that they'd lose food stamps and subsidized child care.

But if subsidized day care is all that keeps working couples from the altar, why not extend this benefit to them? Rather than fight the irreversible forces of globalization, some economists suggest, let's ask its economic winners to ease the working class's lot. Government guaranteed health coverage, for example, ensures that the agony of a layoff doesn't snowball into loss of medical insurance, as well. Bah, just what the Columbia professor might say.

Murray holds that $28,000 a year is better than nothing. The stiffs should suck it in, and those who don't are morally weak. You can hear his bankrollers at the American Enterprise Institute — the financiers and CEOs baying for lower taxes — applauding warmly.

To find out more about Froma Harrop, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at




2 Comments | Post Comment
I knew I was in for a treat with the ending of your first paragraph: "As a scholar at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, and this being an election year, wouldn't he just."
Really enjoyed this column as you have presented the info and presented valid arguments as to why this author is FOS.
"His malice may be concealed by deception, but his wickedness will be exposed in the assembly."
Comment: #1
Posted by: demecra zydeem
Tue Feb 21, 2012 7:56 AM
All of this said with a straight face, but anyone who remembers "Murphy Brown" and the controversey surrounding her un-wed mother schtick knows well which side of the story liberals come down on. Carsey/Werner were all about liberal ideas, so the baby was born and then the child pretty well disappeared from the scripts because, after all, it is not convenient to have children cluttering up busy lifes. Of course, children can not be written out of a real life, but Murphy would deny any involvement in that situation. Nah, you own this and just won't admit to it. Those weren't conservatives calling Americans uptight when it came to sex, that was liberals. Those weren't conservatives pusshing for easy divorce laws, that was liberals. Liberals create a problem and then insist that money is the only solution, more giveaways like free daycare, birth control and of course abortions. I am not really opposed to those things, I just don't see why they have to be free. Pay for these things yourself if you desire them, no one is stopping you. As for the rest of the article, garbage. The left owns this mess because thay really don't like children, view them as a hindrance to fulfillment and as mere clutter to the planet. Everything about liverals is anti-children, from contraceptives to abortion to anti schools of choice. Denying this is an ugly lie. Ugly lies, though, are what liberals do best.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Tom
Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:34 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Froma Harrop
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 10 Feb 2016
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 9 Feb 2016
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 9 Feb 2016

Taxpayers and Housing Need a Divorce

4 Oct 2007 Bringing Them Back to the Great Plains

25 Nov 2008 Giving Thanks for the Leftovers