creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Froma Harrop
Froma Harrop
2 Sep 2014
The 'Spiral of Silence'

With folks yapping all day on social media — Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and the rest — how … Read More.

28 Aug 2014
The Smallness of Being in Economy Class

Americans are in the dumps about their future. What does that have to do with legroom in economy class? Everything. … Read More.

26 Aug 2014
What About That VA Hospital Scandal?

The unofficial end of summer, Labor Day, may serve as a bookend to a scandal that exploded around the … Read More.

In Cyberspace, Everyone's a Critic; Business Laments

Comment

On the prowl for a good dinner in a Florida town we didn't know well, I went on Yelp. Yelp is a social networking website that lets anyone review a business. One Italian restaurant looked promising, with mostly positive reviews and few grumbles. We went there, had a fine meal and told the chef-owner so. But on mentioning that we had seen the reviews on Yelp, a cloud crossed his face.

A few months earlier, he said, an online reviewer had complained that his restaurant had delivered poor service for a party of 20 on Valentine's Day. Surprised, he checked that night's seating and found that none of his tables had accommodated more than four people. He had been "Yelped."

Whoever wrote that anonymous write-up was either a competitor, a personal enemy, a malicious crank or someone who had confused his restaurant with another. In olden times, unhappy customers would talk to him about their concerns. Now they jump into the cyber-ballroom of restaurant criticism, where amateur reviewers hold court before a global audience.

Such public review websites are also deeply corrupt. Professionals now hire themselves out to write fake raves for businesses. Some work out of India.

The whole crazy scene aggravates business owners. In San Francisco, a negative critique on Yelp sent the proprietor of a small bookshop off the deep end. Enraged by a review calling her shop "a TOTAL mess," she retaliated (inappropriately) with angry and insulting messages. She uncovered the reviewer's identity, then visited him at home on a Sunday morning. What ensued depends on whom you ask, but the conflict did make the evening TV news.

Once upon a time, the only influential critics worked for newspapers or magazines. They may have been incompetent, had personal agendas or had stumbled in on an especially bad day.

But the paid reviewers had to obey certain journalistic standards. For example, a factual mistake would be followed by a published correction. If something in the review seemed unfair, the business owner could call the author or the editor or both and discuss the matter further.

The all-critics-are-equal cell-phone apps and websites have turned reviewing into one big bathroom wall. The reviewers can't be stopped, and they're usually unidentified. You can wash nasty comments off a restroom stall, but you can't cleanse cyberspace of anonymous ravings by folks who may not be honest or sane. And there are those who like to be snarky for snarky's sake. Some business owners monitor these sites and respond to criticism, but what about the little guy who just goes about repairing shoes?

In the past, I've found some value in reading reviews purportedly written by the consuming masses. When buying a camera, computer or other electronics, I read the professional reviews, then the comments. The experts, so engaged with technology, don't always speak to my interest in getting something to work without having to take a night course. I paid close attention to remarks about the quality of Company X's customer service when the consumer needs help. Of course, one must read between the lines and try to discern whether complainers are wacky. And they could be working for Company Y.

Reports of the dishonesty behind many reviews have, frankly, turned me off these websites. The question of trust keeps reviewers at old media standbys — or respected websites —- enormously influential. And that's how it should be. But for how long will the general public be able to distinguish between educated opinion and what appears on a website cleverly designed to look authoritative? Will it grow wise to the tricks? Businesses and consumers alike should worry.

To find out more about Froma Harrop, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL CO.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM



Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
The BEST way to find a good restaurant is to do it the "old-fashioned" way. Ask people who have been there and take everything they say with a grain of salt.
Comment: #1
Posted by: David Henricks
Sat May 28, 2011 5:58 AM
Froma is correct that "yelping" and other unsavory tactics will increase the importance of the "old standbys". It will take consumers some time to catch up, however. Until then business owners will just have to the best they can by promoting credible reviews via their website or store front and established organizations like the Better Business Bureau, Zagat, etc.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Michael Bethuy
Tue May 31, 2011 11:38 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Froma Harrop
Sep. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 3 Sep 2014
Dennis Prager
Dennis PragerUpdated 2 Sep 2014
Thomas Sowell
Thomas SowellUpdated 2 Sep 2014

26 Jan 2010 Criticism of 'Avatar' More Interesting Than Film

24 Jun 2010 Government Pensions Face the Music

12 May 2010 Gulf Shrimpers Had Economic Interests, Too