creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Froma Harrop
Froma Harrop
14 Feb 2012
French Model for American Parents

One item in the annals of American exceptionalism is how exceptionally badly behaved American children are. … Read More.

9 Feb 2012
Big Brother Is ‘Sharing'

My, how you've changed, Big Brother. What happened to the sourpuss in "1984," George Orwell's grim … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
What Komen Affair Means for November

The blowup at Susan G. Komen for the Cure set off a political alarm that Republicans dare not ignore. The … Read More.

Cash for Clunkers Means 'Ca-Ching' for Detroit

Share Comment

This is what I told my friend Frank: Under the "cash for clunkers" program, you could get more money for your '93 Mercury Grand Marquis than it was worth — up to $4,500 if you used it to buy a new vehicle with much better gas mileage.

"What would they do with the Merc?" Frank asked.

"Throw it in the hopper," I responded.

"You mean, destroy it?"

"Yeah."

No way. The big red Marquis was his steed — swift as Secretariat, companionable as Mr. Ed. Would Roy Rogers let Trigger be ground into hamburger?

But when Frank saw how quickly others grabbed the deal — the $1 billion Congress allocated for the program was used up in a week — he thought again. He may have another chance, if the program is extended, which, as I type, seems very likely.

Cash for clunkers could be the least glamorous stimulus program ever devised — and among the best designed. It is Temporary (lasts until Nov. 1 or when the money is gone), Targeted (helps Detroit and, with it, the industrial heartland) and Timely (the stampede to the showrooms was immediate). Extra bonus: By helping people trade gas guzzlers in for more fuel-efficient vehicles, the program helps the environment.

The possibility that this popular program will make Obama's economic policies look good has put many Republicans (though not Michigan's) in a bad mood. Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., characterized it as "stupidity coming out of Washington right now." Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., threatened to filibuster efforts to put $2 billion more into the program.

On the other hand, Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich., wrote, "This is simply the most stimulative $1 billion the federal government has spent during the entire economic downturn." She added that "the federal government must come up with more money, immediately, to keep this program going."

Miller is correct.

Motorists across America have been bringing in their guzzling Lincoln Town Cars and Nissan Frontiers and driving off with brand-new Ford Focuses.

Thanks to the program, Ford on Monday reported its first monthly year-over-year sales gain since 2007.

The dealerships are obviously happy. The program has already touched off 250,000 in potential new sales. The National Automobile Dealers Association reports huge backlogs of applications awaiting approval by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which oversees cash for clunkers.

Some critics say that the program may have just pushed people who planned to buy new cars anyway to simply move their purchases forward. There could be something to that, but to be timely, economic stimulus must happen now , not in the future.

And the program has undoubtedly provided a psychological boost that has translated into additional new business. Dealers report that many curious people who visited their showrooms, even upon learning that their vehicles didn't qualify (they must get 18 miles or fewer to the gallon), succumbed anyway. And some non-clunker owners may be overcome by the new-car smell wafting from their neighbors' driveways and join the party.

When it comes to the lure of new cars, I, unlike Frank, am one of the weak ones. I tried to sell him on some of the added benefits of trading in the Grand Marquis for a younger model: a cigarette lighter that works, iPod integration and a GPS device with a silky female voice telling him, "In 200 feet, turn left."

One last point: All this finger-wagging over the cost of this program is ludicrous. The federal government spends more than $3 billion in half a day. This program is actually doing something for both the economy and for ordinary Americans. Don't hold that against it.

To find out more about Froma Harrop, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL CO.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Cash for clunkers is a great! Actually, it doesn't go far enough. I think they should double the rebates, apply it to any upgrade that gets better gas mileage, and never stop the program. I mean, if a little is good, then more is better, right? Hey, I want money for my new car too - why should only those who bought gas guzzlers be rewarded? And as long as we're giving away free money, how about a rebate on obsolete atlases to save my job? This is exactly what we need more of - money for nothing! (...Now if they would only throw in some chick for free).
As for helping the environment, I heard that gas lawn mowers spew pollution many times worse than a car. If true, then the 1/2 hour it takes me to cut my grass pollutes more than the 5 hours I spend commuting each week. How about a rebate to trade in gas lawn mowers for electric ones? More effective AND cost effective. ...And quieter too.
Comment: #1
Posted by: jim5k
Tue Aug 4, 2009 11:10 AM
Lincoln Town Car does not qualify for Cash for Clunkers, The mpg is too high. Please do your homework !!!
Comment: #2
Posted by: Mel Gustafson
Wed Aug 5, 2009 8:27 AM
I traded in an old Durango that needed $2200 in transmission repairs for a new Honda Fit. For me, it was a sweet deal. I saved the money on repair, so it was a "gift" of $4,500 to me. Plus the dealer scrapped the Durango for me!

It's economic lunacy, however. Why should the taxpayers borrow $4,500 from China to give me to destroy a usable vehicle? How does my buying a Japanese car (made in Japan) help the taxpayers repay the $4,500 borrowed from the Chinese?

What this program really did was borrow $4,500 from future generations and then send it to Japan to help out the Japanese auto workers. It does contributes no efficiency or productivity to the U.S. economy to make it possible or even easier to repay the $4,500. As for impact on the U.S. economy, what about the transmission place that lost $2,200 in business?

And why stop with cars? Why doesn't Obama borrow money from the Chinese to pay me to trade in my old TV? My old couch? My old shirts and tennis shoes?

Anyone who supports this program is ignorant of basic economics. I strongly oppose the program, even though I benefited from it. The only thing dumber than supporting such a stupid government program would be not taking advantage of it. But this is a very short-term, selfish approach that is not in the best interests of the country.
Comment: #3
Posted by: jon edward
Wed Aug 5, 2009 10:39 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Froma Harrop
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Larry Elder
Larry ElderUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Sileo
Tom SileoUpdated 16 Feb 2012

6 Apr 2010 'Doing Better' Than One's Parents

28 Sep 2010 Poor Immigrants: Asset or Burden?

15 Nov 2007 Americans' Anxious Love of Flattery