creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Dick Morris
Dick Morris
26 Jan 2016
Mrs. Gingrich's Revenge

Dick Morris, one of the nation's most prominent political consultants, is almost universally credited with … Read More.

15 Feb 2012
Obama's Phony Recovery Stats

Dick Morris, one of the nation's most prominent political consultants, is almost universally credited … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Obama's Assault on America

Dick Morris, one of the nation's most prominent political consultants, is almost universally credited … Read More.

Obama's Phony Mortgage Plan

Share Comment

President Obama and his big spenders are moving quickly to the relief of those who are facing foreclosure on their mortgages. But the program they are offering will do nothing for those most in need.

In the fine print, Obama's plan provides no relief for any homeowner whose mortgage exceeds the total value of his home. But these folks are the ones who have been conned into taking subprime mortgages so loaded with brokerage commissions, interest rate subsidies, bank fees, and lawyer and title company charges that the amount of the mortgage has ballooned. These high mortgage amounts, coupled with declining property values, have turned about 20 percent of American mortgages upside-down, so that the debt exceeds the value of the property.

But excluding these homeowners from help, Obama is guilty of a holier-than-thou hypocrisy. Was it not Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that encouraged such mortgages? Was it not the Democrats in Congress who passed legislation urging Fannie and Freddie to weaken their standards to allow more low- and lower-middle-income families to buy homes?

How can Obama now pretend to be so shocked — shocked — that about 20 percent of America's home mortgages are now worth more than the property they finance? It was the insistence of liberal Democrats that made it so. When Housing and Urban Development Secretary Henry Cisneros demanded that Fannie and Freddie invest 42 percent of their assets in buying low- and lower-middle-income mortgages, and when his successor Andrew Cuomo raised the quota to 50 percent, what did they think would happen? When they explicitly told Fannie and Freddie not to insist on down payments in the mortgages they purchased, how did they think the purchase would be funded?

Obviously, if you don't require the borrower to put money down, the full purchase price must be covered by the mortgage.

To now, piously, refuse to come to the rescue of those who fell for your party's seeming generosity and bought homes on the terms it suggested is hypocritical at best.

But it is not only the over-mortgaged who Obama will ignore, but those who have lost their jobs! If you do not make enough money such that your mortgage payments come to 31 percent of your income, you can't get your mortgage refinanced. If your income has dropped to a point where your monthly payments on your loan consume a greater part of your earnings than 31 percent, you are stuck.

So we have Obama rushing to the aid of those who have been hurt in this bad economy, but exempting from his proposed relief anyone who has lost his job and seen a cut in income or whose property values have dropped below the amount of his mortgage. In other words, he'll help anyone but those most in need.

And, once again, Obama would limit his aid to those who make below $200,000 a year. While he doesn't specify this limit in his proposal, he does limit his intervention to mortgages of less than $720,000. At standard mortgage interest rates, such a loan would call for $60,000 or so in payments a year. To qualify for relief, your mortgage payment can't be larger than 31 percent of your income after the refinancing — or about $200,000. Once more, Obama makes it clear that he is not the president of anyone who makes that much money or more. He is only the president of the other people.

Obama, of course, forgets — or doesn't care — that those making over $200,000 account for almost a third of the total national spending, and you cannot stimulate an economy while constantly cutting off those people from any consideration in any government program. But Obama is determined to try.

To find out more about Dick Morris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 DICK MORRIS AND EILEEN MCGANN

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
A Suggested Change to Contract Law

The reality of the unemployed is they cannot pay their debts. The reality of the debt holders is they are not collecting the monthly payments that are due. The reality is both of their incomes have stopped. Can we recognize this reality and make this change something along this line. Once a person is approved for unemployment benefits ALL debt payments should be required to be suspended without penalty until the worker is re-employed for at least 90 days. This cost the taxpayers NOTHING. In fact, it costs no one anything because projected losses are already estimated in interest rates and in the costs of all products for sale. However, it does keep the unemployed in their homes and in their cars. Most can be saved from bankruptcy. The mortgage holders, and secured and unsecured note holders, will have a much better chance of collecting on their notes in the long run since after 90 days of continuous employment most will be able to resume payments. Those who cannot still will have the ability to seek protection through bankruptcy. The rest of us will not have to pay the increased prices to cover the costs of the debts and products being written off.
This also eliminates the need of worrying about upside down mortgages. I bought a home in 1981 for $60,000 and by 1988 it was worth $20,000 in the depression that attacked Houston, TX. My wife and I struggled through that nightmare, lost jobs and all, but kept making our payments. It took until 2000 for the value of our home passed $60,000. And when we sold it in 2004 it was worth $120,000. We were lucky enough to get through that period, but thousands were not so lucky. Most could have been saved if such a plan was in effect, the Saving and Loan industry might still be in existence, and the American taxpayer would not have to have picked up the cost of the Resolution Trust Corporation. A plan along these lines keeps the responsibility of achieving ownership where it belongs, in the market place and away from the government.

Wayne Johnson

Comment: #1
Posted by: Wayne Johnson
Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:51 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Dick Morris
Jan. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012

4 Aug 2010 Eugene J. Morris 1910-2010

18 Nov 2009 Obama's Health Care Plan Not Out of the Woods Yet

26 Jun 2008 Obama's New Strategy