creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
diane dimond
Diane Dimond
26 May 2012
Watching the Justice System Up-close

When they first sit down together, they look uncomfortable. No one knows each other, and it could be a group … Read More.

12 May 2012
Happy Mother's Day -- If You Aren't Locked Up

Happy Mother's Day to all the other moms out there! Your children have likely bought you a nice card and a gift,… Read More.

5 May 2012
Faith in America Redux

Sometimes a columnist writes something that grabs people by the throat. I guess I accomplished that last week … Read More.

Unleashing Our Inner Sociopath

Share Comment

Has the Internet made us more vicious? I ask because it sure seems to me that we are quickly becoming a people who have forgotten how to empathize with others. With our computer anonymity, many of us have decided we can "say" things over the World Wide Web that we would never, ever say to someone's face. Cruel comments can be lobbed without personal risk, so we send them out like invisible hand grenades, set to explode when opened.

Read some of the remarks others leave behind at your favorite news website. Some of the remarks are way past mean — some are criminal, as they issue death threats or illegally invade the privacy of others. And some recent actions taken with the help of the Internet are also criminal.

I'm speaking, of course, about the case of 18-year-old Rutgers University student Tyler Clementi who committed suicide after learning his roommate had rigged a webcam to beam out his tryst with another male student — live — over the Internet. Clementi's sadistically spirited roommate never gave a thought to how the shy classical violinist who was grappling with his sexuality might react to this horrific breach of privacy. And that's the problem!

Dare I say the Internet has become our means of tapping into our inner sociopath?

It's not just the younger "Internet generation," but grown adults, as well, who fail to stop to think what effect their actions will have on the target of their cruelty. Psychiatrists will tell you that's classic sociopathic behavior, a complete lack of empathy for others.

I told you a few weeks ago about a new book I've written, "Cirque Du Salahi — Be Careful Who You Trust," about the couple erroneously branded as the "White House Gate Crashers." In the book, which highlights the poor journalism behind the splashy tale, I revealed that Michaele Salahi has suffered for 17 years with multiple sclerosis. It was a gut-wrenching disclosure for Michaele, and she wept when she talked about it on television.

The Internet reaction was jaw dropping. The inhuman comments ranged from, "I don't believe it. I want to see a doctor's note," to, "She picked M.S. because it matches with her initials — she's too stupid to think of any other disease." Many posts hammered the couple for their past debts, and one went so far as to declare, "I'm wishing for a murder-suicide with these two."

No matter what the perceived transgressions of a fellow citizen, when they reveal they have a life-altering, non-curable disease, I would think the proper response would be one of sympathy.

Not in the Salahi's case, and not in the case of Fox News commentator Glenn Beck, after he recently disclosed he has a disease which might result in his total blindness.

The Internet comments included ugliness like this: "It is not Mr. Beck's eyes that should fail, rather his vocal chords should shrivel up." And this one from a man named Brian: "Beck is already blind to the truth, so what does it matter if he can't see." Alyn wrote: "He should not lose his eyesight. He should lose his life."

What has happened to us? We're supposed to be the country where people are proud to live free and have the freedom to speak our minds and not be vilified for it. It's been our tradition for 300 years. Yet now, hiding under cover of a computer, some of us have devolved into an Iran-esque cyber-stoning in the public square. Disagree with other's opinions but don't wish people dead because of them!

Five young people have committed suicide in the last few weeks after constant cyber-bulling made them feel life wasn't worth living. Each of them was trying to sort out sexual feelings and did not yet have the adult ability to shrug off the ugly Internet attacks. From New Jersey's Rutgers University to small towns in Massachusetts, California, Texas and beyond, the lure of producing hateful missives and hitting the "send" button without so much as a second thought has contributed to needless deaths.

Schools and other institutions hide behind the idea of freedom of speech as the reason why this can't be curbed. But I'm reminded by Wendy Murphy, a victim's advocate from Boston, that, "the federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals put it ... succinctly in 2002: 'There is no constitutional right to be a bully.'"

Our laws and legal system must catch up to our technological ability to harass, defame and torture others through our computers. I propose prosecutors pursue the maximum penalty in the Rutgers suicide case (where two young people stand charged) as a signal to other hate-filled people that their behavior is just not acceptable. If we can teach people the proper etiquette for a bowling alley, we can certainly try for the same on the Internet, right?

The temptation of instant Internet connectedness has indeed put us in touch with our inner sociopathic feelings — from stupid and immature students to adults who write that they wish someone was dead — and I'm ashamed of us.

Diane Dimond's new book, "Cirque Du Salahi — Be Careful Who You Trust," can be pre-ordered at Amazon.com. Visit Diane Dimond's official website at www.dianedimond.com for investigative reporting, polls and more. To find out more about Diane Dimond and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Great column, Diane. It saddens me to see our society become so vitriolic behind the safety and security of fake user names, distanced keyboards and lack of accountability for one's words. It's become much more than "snark."
It's become specious hatred spreading like wildfire.

Remember the next time you're tempted to join the ranks of these "first responders of smut." There but for the grace of God go I. Next time it COULD be you.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Sharlene Martin
Sat Oct 9, 2010 2:25 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Diane Dimond
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

14 May 2011 Time to Adjust Our Thinking About Sex Abusers

4 Sep 2010 A Needle in the Haystack of Truth

7 Jan 2012 Government Bullies Need Reining In