The spookiest time of the year is fast approaching, and you have likely already heard about local law enforcement officers preparing to keep your area free of danger on Halloween night.
They may be visiting schools to counsel kids on safe practices. They may be warning drivers about watching out for children on Halloween night. In communities across America, officers are fanning out to knock on the doors of registered sex offenders.
The idea behind visiting local "S.O.s" (as they are referred to) is twofold. First, it's a transparent effort to check that the address police have on record for the ex-offender is still good. Second, it is a somber face-to-face warning to the S.O. that they are not allowed to interact with children on Halloween.
Laws vary from state to state, but generally speaking those convicted of sex offenses are not allowed to decorate the outside of their homes or leave their outdoor lights on during Halloween night. Most S.O.s are required to display a poster in the front window saying they are not giving out candy or any other treats. In some states, there is a mandatory shut-in order for them from sundown to midnight.
This has become an annual ritual between cops and ex-cons. But you know what? It's a waste of time.
You read that right. There has never been a concrete reason given that explains why a sex offender would choose the very public holiday of Halloween to re-offend. More importantly, I couldn't find a single report of a child being sexually attacked by a stranger during a Halloween party or during door-to-door trick-or-treating.
Look, the shameful crime of child molestation happens countless times every single day in this country, but honestly, there's no evidence that the mystical day of Halloween sparks extra sex crimes. That doesn't mean it's a day to drop our guard, of course, but it is not a day to go looking for stranger-danger boogeymen that aren't there.
It's much more likely that your child could be struck by a car Halloween night or fall victim to tooth decay from eating all their loot.
The idea that spider-web decorations, carved pumpkins and costumed citizens somehow incites crimes against children reminds me of the urban legend that grew up around tainted Halloween candy. Remember that hue and cry?
We now know that only two deaths of children have ever been traced to poisoned Halloween candy, and both deaths were caused by family members.
After Halloween in 1970, in Detroit, 5-year-old Kevin Toston fell into a coma and died of a heroin overdose. Lab analysis of his candy bag contents showed they had been sprinkled with heroin. Officers later discovered the boy had stumbled upon his uncle's drug stash and had accidentally poisoned himself. In an effort to protect the uncle, the family had dusted the child's candy stash with heroin.
And, in 1974, Timothy O'Bryan of Houston died after eating a Pixy Stix laced with cyanide. Turned out his father had deliberately tampered with the candy to collect on the 8-year-old's life insurance policy. It was a homegrown homicide and, despite all the media reports to the contrary, not the work of diabolical criminals bent on poisoning children. (By the way, Ronald O'Bryan was convicted of murdering his son in 1975 and was executed in 1984.)
The Los Angeles Times quotes Joel Best, a professor of sociology at California State University, as saying he's been trying to debunk the Halloween candy myth for more than 30 years. His research found a total of 78 cases of "poisoned candy" between 1958 and 1988. Two were the deaths I've just explained above, and the rest, according to Best, were proven pranks.
I can't tell you where or when this Halloween sex offender myth began, but it persists to this day. Every year at this time, newspapers and TV news programs are full of reports about police activities to curb this so-called menace that supposedly sprouts up every Oct. 31. And in some areas of the country, the U.S. Marshals service pitches in to make the S.O. house calls. It's become an annual media staple much like covering fireworks on the Fourth of July or the Thanksgiving Day parade.
When you remove diagnosed career pedophiles from the mix (and in my opinion they should never be released from prison, and they often are not), most convicted sex offenders do not re-offend. They work to comply with complicated sex-offender registry regulations and their parole officer's rules. They try hard to blend in to their community, where rebuilding their life by finding a job, a place to live and even a church at which to worship can be difficult.
I think it goes without saying that our police officers have better and more important things to do every Halloween season. But it's worth saying anyway. Let's free up law enforcement from this annual charade so they can concentrate on the real criminals in our neighborhoods.
Diane Dimond's book, "Cirque Du Salahi — Be Careful Who You Trust," can be ordered at Amazon.com. Visit Diane Dimond's official website at www.dianedimond.com for investigative reporting, polls and more. To find out more about Diane Dimond and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM

|
 |
Comments
|
13 Comments | Post Comment
|
|
Ms. Dimond!
You never cease to amaze me! Thank you so much for reaching out and de-bunking the media hysteria!
You are right, there has NEVER been a child molested or abducted on Halloween by a sex offender, or as I call them, registrant.
I truly wish the general public would open their eyes and see the minimal offenses that are labeling people as sex offenders. People who relieve themselves in the bushes while fishing/camping, teenagers in underage relationships, men falsely accused by ex wives wanting custody of their children, parents taking pictures of their children in the bath tub, people being sent inappropriate emails or going to the wrong websites, people streaking at ball games or mooning someone.......the list goes on and on! Until the citizens of this country realize that these laws are affecting more children than they are protecting, the laws will continue to grow because lawmakers are hiding behind them to gain votes and the media to gain notoriety.
Thank you again for telling the truth!
Blessings!
Comment: #1
Posted by: rwsmom
Sat Oct 22, 2011 12:28 PM
|
|
|
|
I agree. The hysteria is out of control. This not only effects those required to register, but their entire family.
There must be a reasonable way to determine who might be a danger and stop punishing hundreds of thousands for the rare crimes of a few.
Almost all new offences are from those we don't yet know about. Most offences occur in the family.
And I would think that those that happen in families will now go unreported, due to not wanting a family member to be labeled a monster. How many offences are not reported? Why, there a thousands of underage relationships that go on everyday, but the law enforcement pick and choose which ones to proscecute. Those that are proscecuted, are deemed quilty even before a trial. Of all those that are on these registries, only a few pose any risk, Yet, their life is essentually over. The children in these families suffer the most. While saying we are protecting children,
we are ruining thousands of chidren's lives.
Comment: #2
Posted by: buchanan
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:10 AM
|
|
|
|
Thank you for posting this story! I could not agree more. I think more people need to be aware that "most convicted sex offenders do not re-offend." There is no reason to have someone on the registry put up a sign on Halloween. Most states already have a public registry. Enough is enough. There are many people on the registry who were falsely convicted. People who were 18 and with their 15 year old girlfriends. Some of them will be on the registry for life. Most lives ruined.
I could not agree more with the poster above me "While saying we are protecting children,
we are ruining thousands of chidren's lives."
Comment: #3
Posted by: D
Sun Oct 23, 2011 9:38 AM
|
|
|
|
I applaud your courage in standing up and showing yourself as a voice of reason. This is a subject that many would prefer to put on the back burner and go with the flow of paranoia and fear that is rampant in particular, at this time of the year. This is an extremely well researched and written article, which I am sure will be vehemently dragged over the coals by the uneducated masses, but digested and filed by the growing number of people who are actually willing to admit there is more to the label "s ex offender" than meets the eye. Again, thank you!
Comment: #4
Posted by: cherokee49
Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Thank you so much for spreading the word about the myths surrounding "sex offenders" and Halloween. It is so refreshing to read an article that debunks the media driven hysteria and puts the truth and statistics and supporting documentation out there for the public to see, read and reference. I am very grateful, as the wife of a sex offender, it's exhausting educating my friends, family, and the general public about the facts and stats. of sex offenders. Thank you so much again, for this article. We need more people like you to help spread the word about all the myths surrounding sex offenders. I appreciate you and your work.
Comment: #5
Posted by: sotomayor2013
Sun Oct 23, 2011 2:35 PM
|
|
|
|
Great article. I'm the devoted girlfriend of an RSO, whom I live with and we own our house together. This will be our first Halloween here, and I was looking forward to finally living in a place where we would get trick or treaters. But thanks to the local sheriff's department, not only could my boyfriend be ARRESTED for opening the door, he could also be arrested if we even have candy in the house!! We also get to display a cute little sticker that says we're not giving out candy. Even though I am very very used to the ridiculous, unfounded hysteria that follows SOs around like a virus, this was a new one for me and didn't cease to infuriate me. It's sad that we can't partake in a well-loved tradition, but worse is that the media seems to be getting people to buy into the hype. Thanks again for a non-biased, ACCURATE article depicting the true statistics behind sex offenders and Halloween.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Shana
Sun Oct 23, 2011 2:42 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: rwsmom - Thank you so much for writing. It has been my experience that when there is public hysteria about something it is best to see if it is borne of hysterical/copycat media reports. That's what I found here when I dug in deep.
Every year reporters in cities across the land just take the annual Halloween trek of law enforcement to the doors of Sex Offenders as "normal". But there isn't anything to back it up! There is no real reason to single out SO on this holiday above all others. I mean, why not door knock known repetitive drunk drivers as they injure and kill Halloween revelers more than any other portion of the population?
If cops want to make sure sex offenders live where they say they do then PAROLE OFFICERS should have the answer as they are supposed to keep constant tabs on S.O.'s. (Don't get me started on the abundance of people on the SO Registry that shouldn't even be there)
Anyway, thanks for accepting the truth and not the MYTH of this annual exercise!
Diane Dimond
www.DianeDimond.com
Comment: #7
Posted by: diane dimond
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:25 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: cherokee49 You know its easy for the masses to follow the public sentiment as published year after year and shown on TV every Halloween season. but the facts are the facts. Halloween provides no more stimulus to sex offenders than any other day and the hoax of these annual police "raids" on SO's homes needs to stop! The public's money is much better spent on figuring out ways to get undeserving people OFF the needllessly bloated sex registry rolls! ~ DD
Comment: #8
Posted by: diane dimond
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:30 PM
|
|
|
|
I could tell you when the Halloween law hysteria began, Diane. On my website is a Halloween laws page at oncefllendotcom. I'd like to point out something else as well.
The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel offers the only recorded incident of any child raped and killed while out trick-or-
treating. In 1973, a nine-year-old was killed by Gerald Turner, known as the “Halloween Killer.” Because of Turner,
Wisconsin residents hold trick-or-treating during daytime hours. However, the f/k/a Harvard Law Blog found two
interesting things regarding the Turner case: The 9 year old girl was trick-or-treating alone and went to the house of a stranger, and Turner had no prior criminal record, so if such a law existed in 1973, the Halloween sex offender laws would not have applied to Turner. Thus, to date there is STILL no recorded incident of a child molested or killed by a convicted sex offender on Halloween.
That had nothing to do with Virginia, which has the earliest recorded Halloween law, 'Operation Trick No Treat" beginning 2002.
I'd like to point out there is one Halloween Laws study, Mark Chaffin, Jill Levenson, Elizabeth Letourneau and Paul Stern. "How safe are trick-or-treaters? An analysis on sex crime rates on Halloween." This study found no significant increase in risk for nonfamilial child sexual abuse on or just prior to Halloween. Although sex offenders may use seemingly innocent opportunities to engage children and sexually abuse and therefore might be hypothesized to use trick-or-treat for ulterior purposes, this logic does not appear to translate into any actual unusual rate of sex offenses on Halloween. The absence of a Halloween effect remained constant over the 9-year period, beginning well before the current interest in Halloween sex offender policies and extending to recent years. Any Halloween policies that have been adopted by reporting jurisdictions during that period appear not to have affected the overall sex offense rate.
Comment: #9
Posted by: O'Really
Sun Oct 23, 2011 9:03 PM
|
|
|
|
Thanks you for telling the truth!
PS< love to see a study on how much MONEY IS MADE from all the Scare Tactics perpetrated upon the public from all the Halloween Sex Offender Mob Mentality Antics of Law Enforcement...
My though is this.. All the OVERTIME PAY RECEIVED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT DOING THESE NEEDLESS ACTIVITIES.. could be brought to the light.
Just how much does all this cost tax payers?
If you want to be shocked.. read the below article: The Yearly Cost of the Sex Offender Registry in Virginia by Year
You can find that article on our site cfcamerica
Also,
Question: If the 800,000 people on the Public Shaming Registry are so dangerous.. why are they not in prison?
Another question: Each year over 12,000 deaths are related to alcohol. 12,000 DEATHS. Why is Alcohol legal? Why do they not have a DUI Registry? Why are those convicted of DUI not banned from 2000 feet of any place that sells alcohol?.. the list of questions goes on.
Anyone who is on the Public Sex Offender registry and their families will end up being supported totally by the TAX PAYERS as once on the registry it is almost impossible to get and keep a job. Tax payers will either support all on the registry by welfare and food stamps or pay for them to be in jail or prison. Either way, Tax payers are going to support all who are on the public registry.. get this, MANY STUDIES SHOW THE PUBLIC REGISTRY NOT ONLY IS NOT EFFECTIVE AT PROTECTING SOCIETY, BUT ALSO ACTUALLY ENHANCES RECIDIVISM! Dianne, come see us cfcamerica
Comment: #10
Posted by: CFCAMERICA
Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:08 PM
|
|
|
|
It is refreshing to see people speak out against the bullying and terrorizing of society in general by our politicians and law enforcement.
According to what I have read, citizens are SIX times more likely to be sexually assaulted by people who were previously convicted of a NON-SEX related crime. IF the politicians are truly attempting to "protect" society and our children, why isn't anyone other than registered sex offenders being "tracked", bullied and harassed?
And then there are the staggering numbers of "new" crimes committed against children by people who never committed crimes before. How do we protect our children from them? Well, I guess it has to be a change in the way we look at parenting and community involvement. Maybe we need to start caring about our communities enough to get involved with what is really going on and stop allowing politicians and those financially backing them to distort the facts for popularity and advancement.
Unfortunately, the story will be old tomorrow and we will go back to our lives and ignore reality. It's what our country seems to do best, at the cost of our families and our children's safety.
Comment: #11
Posted by: Secrets_of_Safety
Wed Oct 26, 2011 6:31 PM
|
|
|
|
We agree with everything you said up to the point you said they should go after the "real" criminals.Who do you think are the real criminals that police should follow instead of S.O...who do you think are the real ones...potheads? NYC has the largest marijuana arrest record destroying people's lives for small amounts of marijuana. Or maybe it is the homeless people they arrest to sleep in some place because they have no place to go. Or maybe its the bankers whose scams have dispossessed millions of Americans from their homes. These guys and the CEOs on wall street are the real criminals and the cops never go after them so who are the criminals that you are talking about that they should go after? And even if they went after the CEO and the bankers the real criminals you'd still have too many police standing around doing nothing because we have too many police. Maybe the problem is we've listened to the politicians who kept saying the boogy man is coming we need more police and more police and now we are a police state
Joe Barton and Paula Gloria
Comment: #12
Posted by: Joe Barton
Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:04 PM
|
|
|
|
Hey here's an idea: If the police don't have anything to do because there aren't enough "real criminals" to focus on, how about we fire them and save us the unnecessary expense?
Comment: #13
Posted by: John Doe
Tue Jan 10, 2012 12:51 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|