creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
diane dimond
Diane Dimond
26 May 2012
Watching the Justice System Up-close

When they first sit down together, they look uncomfortable. No one knows each other, and it could be a group … Read More.

12 May 2012
Happy Mother's Day -- If You Aren't Locked Up

Happy Mother's Day to all the other moms out there! Your children have likely bought you a nice card and a gift,… Read More.

5 May 2012
Faith in America Redux

Sometimes a columnist writes something that grabs people by the throat. I guess I accomplished that last week … Read More.

Polygamy Pays

Share Comment

Laws are laws. You follow them, and there's no problem. You break them, and you'll likely go to jail, right?

Well ... not so fast. In the state of Utah, a person can admit felony behavior — on national television, no less — and no punishment occurs.

Even though Utah has one of the broadest laws against plural marriage, there are still an estimated 20,000 mostly secretive polygamist households tucked away in enclaves all over the sparsely populated state. Some are disheveled, disorganized compounds with poor sanitation, access to stores, health care and organized education. Other polygamists maintain their lifestyle in well heeled homes with plenty of amenities.

Despite the Utah law that no man "shall marry, purport to marry or cohabitate with multiple wives," it is a crime that's rarely prosecuted unless a man takes an underage bride. That, according to Paul Murphy of the Utah Attorney General's Office, is considered child sexual abuse and "is punishable under the state's child bigamy law, which carries a penalty of up to 15 years in prison."

Enter into this picture one Kody Brown, a fundamentalist Mormon who lives with multiple wives in Lehi, Utah. He likes to say his faith "rewards good behavior," so why, he asks, stop with one good marriage when you could have more? Knowing that prosecution in his state would be unlikely, this handsome, blond 41-year-old salesman went public with his polygamist lifestyle.

He and his three wives signed with cable TV's The Learning Channel to be the stars of a reality show called "Sister Wives." In the opening episode, Kody announced that since "love should be multiplied, not divided," he had decided to take yet another wife. His first three got together to pick out the new woman's ring.

Everyone seemed content with the arrangement. Today, between wives Meri, Janelle, Christine and his newest addition, Robyn, Brown is head of a household that includes four wives, 13 children and three step-children.

Kody Brown openly lives a lifestyle that is against the law, and no one has made a move to stop it. No arrests have been made even though every Sunday night TLC offers up more juicy details (read that, more evidence) of Brown's crime.

Officials in Utah insist they were watching Brown's activities even before TLC came to town, and now that the state's worst-kept secret has been exposed for the whole nation to see, the Utah County Prosecutor has begun an "official investigation."

Mostly I wonder about the Brown children and how the glare of all this national attention will affect them in the long run.

And, I wonder if executives at TLC are secretly hoping for a ratings-grabbing arrest scene for their daddy. Wow, that sure would drive eyeballs to the channel!

What a difference a few years makes. Several years ago, another Utah polygamist went on national television to brag about his lifestyle. Tom Green was part of a breakaway fundamentalist Mormon group, and he eventually took seven wives and had more than 30 children. During his numerous TV appearances, he nearly dared state officials to try to prosecute him — and they did. He was convicted on several counts of bigamy and one count of failure to pay child support, and later he was tried and found guilty of one count of child rape for having sex with his 13-year-old "bride." Green spent six years in prison.

Brown has been just as defiant as Green. He goes public every week about details of his multiple marriages. Yet it seems highly unlikely that his case will go the way of Green's. First, Brown didn't take any underage brides, and there's no hint of any endangerment among his seemingly happy and well-cared-for children. Also, Utah prosecutors have now declared they simply don't have the manpower to prosecute cases like Brown's.

"Once a week or so I get a phone call asking why we don't just round up all the polygamists," Murphy told me. "But can you imagine? First, we'd have to build new prisons to hold them all. Then, we'd have to devise a whole foster care system to accommodate their children."

He's got a point, I guess. But I wonder why the state bothered to launch that "official investigation" of Brown, then. Is that all for show, too?

The Brown family says they want to come out from the shadow of their situation and are "looking for understanding." I'm betting the money they make from the now renewed second season of their series is also part of their motivation.

Janelle Brown, the mother of six of Kody's children, told People Magazine she wants the criticism of her family and lifestyle to stop.

"If we raise productive, contributing members of society who are moral and ethical, that's our final goal," she said.

Gee, I thought abiding by the laws of the land was the moral and ethical way to live a life. Maybe I got that wrong.

Diane Dimond's new book, "Cirque Du Salahi — Be Careful Who You Trust," can be pre-ordered at Amazon.com. Visit Diane Dimond's official website at www.dianedimond.com for investigative reporting, polls and more. To find out more about Diane Dimond and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

6 Comments | Post Comment
Unless the multiple women calling themselves Mrs. Brown receive state support for being "single" mothers of multiple children, unless they are all - women and children - added as dependents on Mr. Brown's state-aided health insurance, and unless any of them got their marriage recorded by the State (with all the attendant legal implications), who cares? So, 4 women choose to cohabit with one man and call themselves his wives. They are all consenting adults. Why does the State care what consenting adults do with their sex lives? If the Browns were not Mormons and they didn't call themselves married, nobody would be prosecuting them.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Ariana
Sun Dec 5, 2010 11:06 AM
Lady, don't you have something more positive and constructive to do than watch TV and decide that somebody in the US somewhere is breaking some moralistic law? Get a life please! These people are not hurting ANYONE. This is sad.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Bill
Sun Dec 5, 2010 10:55 PM
Probably the reason no one is arresting them is because nobody cares. Sometimes it's time for outdated laws to be repealed. Remember that homosexuality also used to be illegal, and slavery and making blacks sit at the back of the bus used to be too. Should we have continued to abide by those laws unquestiongly simply because it was "the law"? I'm appalled by your comment "Gee, I thought abiding by the laws of the land was the moral and ethical way to live a life." Thank goodness you weren't on the jury for Rosa Parks, and that you don't live in a country where people can be stoned to death for premarital sex. How naise to believe that because a law exists it must be "moral and ehtical" to follow it.
As long as no one is being abused and everyone is of legal age, whose business is it if consenting adults, male or female, want to live a multiple-spouse polygamous or polyandrous lifestyle? Surely we have bigger "crimes" to worry about--like the ones that actually harm people. Frankly, I don't want my tax dollars, police forces or justice-department dollars wasted going after these people while we still have violent criminals on the streets.
And as for your concerns that the kids being exploited by TLC, maybe you have a point there...but have you given equal criticism to Kate Plus Eight? Somehow I doubt it.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Jane
Mon Dec 6, 2010 5:19 AM
I understand that some people will object to the lifestyle that Mr. Brown and his "wives" have selected. It doesn't exactly match my ideals either. I don't understand, though, how we have the right to question the morality or ethics of a situation which seems to include mutual respect, honesty, and love.
I support any interpersonal relationship in which the parties are free to express their feelings, unilaterally change the relationship if it isn't working, and otherwise pursue their own happiness.
In the extreme case, please remember that if we believe that one must obey the law unquestioningly in order to be ethical and moral, we would still be British citizens, not to mention all the other "legal" horrors that have gone away in the intervening years.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Rob
Mon Dec 6, 2010 10:32 AM
While I think polygamy is morally wrong, I don't think we should be making so many laws based on what certain individuals feel is immoral. There should be a better definition of right and wrong that doesn't just stop at "because I said so".

Anyway, how is one man "marrying" 4 woman and spawning a dozen children worse than another man spawning a dozen children with 4 women with whom he no longer maintains a relationship? How many times do we hear of some NBA star's vast illegitimate brood or how many times do multiple women appear on Maury Povich to confront their single baby-daddy? There was a YouTube video not long ago where some NFL player had trouble recalling how many children he had and what their ages were (which was no surprise since he had NINE children by EIGHT different women). These actions aren't crimes simply because the men and women in these cases don't claim to be married? That's absurd. Why is it more acceptable to father numerous children with numerous women and NOT raise them and care for them than it is to father numerous children with numerous women and remain together as one large family?

As a society, we should work to curb the number of children being born and raised outside of a healthy two-parent relationship before we waste any resources prosecuting polygamists. I agree a law is a law, and if you break the law you should pay the price. But rather than blindly enforce stupid laws, we should perhaps revisit why those laws exist in the first place. There are plenty of laws governing child support, spousal support, statutory rape, child neglect and abuse, etc... Do we really need polygamy laws on top of that?
Comment: #5
Posted by: Nathan H.
Mon Dec 6, 2010 12:30 PM
And to think some of us (like me) said that the gravy train would stop with gay marriage. "Legalized polygamy is next," said a lot of us. We were laughed at and scorned. Now...we've got men taking multiple wives in open defiance of Utah law, and the authorities are doing nothing about it. What's interesting is that Utah was refused admission to the Union until the dominant Mormon Church agreed to outlaw polygamy - which it did in 1890. Now, look for full-blown legalization, coming soon to a statehouse near you. As for those of you who claim this man's behavior isn't hurting anyone (wrong - think of the kids) I'm ashamed of you. And if you think it's bad to make laws based on someone's understanding of morality - aren't you the very ones proposing to do exactly that - repeal the law against polygamy because you feel the law is "wrong?" Whoops! I've got bad news for you - every law on the books is there because some congressman or state legislator felt something was "right" or "wrong" and decided to attempt to codify his moral interpretation - and some president or governor agreed. Sorry to burst the bubble of you "morality is defined by individual choice" types, but you couldn't possibly be more mistaken. Kudos to the columnist for highlighting this travesty, and shame on the rest of you for taking her to the woodshed. She already pointed out that these cases are draining the welfare system dry.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Matt
Mon Dec 6, 2010 6:16 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Diane Dimond
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

26 Dec 2009 A Crime and Justice Wish List for 2010

30 Oct 2010 A Mexican Savior or a Sitting Duck?

23 Oct 2010 Terrorist's Trial on Trial