opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
diane dimond
Diane Dimond
6 Feb 2016
Personal Responsibility From Public Servants -- Too Much to Ask?

The law says dangerous or illegal actions have consequences. Countless U.S. citizens enter the justice system … Read More.

30 Jan 2016
Juveniles and the Justice System

Everyone knows youngsters aren't mentally or emotionally equipped to make good decisions. That's why most … Read More.

23 Jan 2016
The Supreme Court Decision That Could Change the Presidency

It will be a monumental decision either way: one that has the potential to shape national politics and public … Read More.

A Needle in the Haystack of Truth


I took some time off my regular schedule to write a book. It's all about how we as a society have abrogated our opinion-making and handed it over to whatever media we follow.

For some people these days, it takes too much time and effort to engage in critical thinking. But what if the media are just playing follow the leader — parroting each other and not really checking out the facts? It happens all the time, and now more than ever we need to use our common sense to help lead us to the truth.

My new book is about the couple the media branded "The White House Gate Crashers," Michaele and Tareq Salahi. The name of it is "Cirque Du Salahi — Be Careful Who You Trust," and I don't mention it here as just a shameless plug for my own work. I mention is because Cirque — or circus — perfectly describes the information superhighway traveling into our homes every minute of every day. It has become a circus of truths, half-truthful exaggerations and downright lies. Many of us gobble it up without stopping to think what we're digesting.

Let's analyze the nickname the press gave the Salahis just hours after they appeared at President Obama's first state dinner on Nov. 24, 2009: "The White House Gate Crashers." But, whoa! Stop and think about that a minute.

Nobody "crashes" the gate at the White House, for goodness sakes! The place is ringed with armed guards and a massive security net. So why would the media say that — over and over before any real facts were known? Because it's catchy and it fits into today's terrorist watch mentality. Salahi — why it even sounds like a suspect Middle Eastern name!

The Salahis decided to open up to one person — me — and tell their whole story. During my investigation, I got to dissect all their e-mails with a White House representative who promised to try to get them in to the event.

I discovered the Salahis honestly believed they were invited to the welcoming ceremony for the prime minister of India. I learned that once they arrived at the White House, they presented their passports at not one, but two Secret Service checkpoints, and they were waved right in. Once inside the grand reception hall, staff ushered them through the official receiving line and then into the lavish dinner tent set up on the South Lawn.

Now, what part of that sounds like a "gate crashing" to you? That's right — none of it. Yet to this day most media continue to refer to the Salahis as "crashers" and remind the public that federal charges are still a possibility.


The Salahis immediately cooperated with federal investigators who learned the details I've just outlined for you — and much more. Yet those investigators apparently didn't pass the word on to the congressional Homeland Security Committee. Even before the hearing, members publicly vilified the Salahis.

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee called them "the perpetrators." Her colleague, Eleanor Holmes Norton, declared, "Clearly they were outlaws before they crashed the White House." So when the couple was subpoenaed to appear before the committee, is there any wonder why they exercised their constitutional right to remain silent? With the deck already stacked against them, they had no choice but to take their lawyer's advice and plead the Fifth. Your lawyer would tell you to do the same.

It was a shameful kangaroo court proceeding conducted by the congressional panel that's supposed to be concentrating on ways to keep the country safe in this post 9-11 atmosphere. Instead, the politicians were more interested in getting face time on TV while the story was still hot.

The Salahis are not like you and me. Months before the White House event, they were cast as members on a "reality" TV show. An odd move, in my book, but being odd is not against the law in America. They owe money to multiple creditors, but how many other citizens have gotten caught up in this bad economy? Their worst luck was to become the target in this new era of lock-and-load journalism. The media decide who the focus is and relentlessly zero in.

The Salahis biggest transgression may have been that they blindly trusted too many people. Their own entertainment lawyer paved the way to the White House state dinner, then dropped them like a bag of toxic waste after the scandal broke. They trusted federal investigators would help clear their names. They trusted that the justice system and the federal grand jury hearing their evidence would exonerate them. They trusted that the media would ultimately get the story straight. But here we are, almost a year later, and the Salahis are still twisting in the wind.

Too many of today's professional journalists, augmented by mostly inexperienced Internet bloggers, are all too eager to jump on the story du jour for fear of being left behind. Too bad they don't take the time to research facts before parroting what others have reported before them.

Be careful who you trust.

Diane Dimond's new book, "Cirque Du Salahi — Be Careful Who You Trust," can be pre-ordered at Visit Diane Dimond's official website at for investigative reporting, polls and more. To find out more about Diane Dimond and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at



1 Comments | Post Comment
My hope is that "Cirque Du Salahi" s will get people to think twice before they believe everything they see and hear on the tube. I totally agree with the point that Diane Dimond makes about bloggers and the lack of fact checking that can occur before stories post. By the time they get from one end of the "highway" to the other, it's nearly impossible to separate fact from fiction. This book is certainly a "must read" for me.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Patti Petow
Sat Sep 4, 2010 1:32 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Diane Dimond
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 13 Feb 2016
David Harsanyi
David HarsanyiUpdated 12 Feb 2016
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 12 Feb 2016

6 Feb 2016 Personal Responsibility From Public Servants -- Too Much to Ask?

21 Jun 2013 There Ought to Be a Law Against an “Incompetent” Congress

17 Jan 2015 The Takeaway From the Terror in France