creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Dennis Prager
Dennis Prager
14 Feb 2012
Chris Christie on Israel -- and What It Means to Be a Leader

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie addressed the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) last week. … Read More.

31 Jan 2012
They Have Islamist Fanatics, We Have Secularist Fanatics

The Muslim world is threatened by religious fanaticism. The Western world is threatened by secular fanaticism. … Read More.

24 Jan 2012
Evangelicals and Romney: Should Theology Matter?

As an American, a Republican, and a fiscal and social conservative — and though I have endorsed no … Read More.

Why Are So Many Women Depressed? Part I

Share Comment

It is widely reported that women suffer depression at twice the rate of men. Apparently, more women are clinically depressed than ever before.

On the assumption that these assessments are true, the question anyone interested in the subject — which means anyone who cares about any woman — is, why?

As one who regularly talks to women, and about men and women, on my radio show and who has informally counseled women of all ages, I would like to offer some explanations that may run counter to currently acceptable ones, but which should shed light on the subject.

Assuming that any new phenomenon — in this case, much higher rates of depression among women — suggests a new cause, the major new cause can only be the consequences of feminism.

This does not mean that feminism has achieved nothing good. Of course it has. A movement for equality between the sexes, an attempt to remove all sex-based obstacles to a woman's right to do whatever she wishes with her life, must do some good.

But how much good feminism has achieved is unrelated to the question of whether it is a, or even the, primary contributor to the rise in depression among so many women. One can view feminism as the greatest social achievement since the emancipation of slaves and still regard it as the major reason many women are depressed.

So, enumerating the reasons feminism has caused many women's depression is not necessarily an indictment of feminism. Many good social developments come with personal prices.

We begin our list with the expectations feminism raised in a generation of women.

As I wrote in my book on happiness ("Happiness Is a Serious Problem," HarperCollins), much unhappiness comes from having expectations. When our expectations are not fulfilled — and most are not — we can become unhappy and even bitter. And when our expectations are fulfilled, we are no happier because fulfilled expectations undermine gratitude (we are not grateful when we get what assume we will get) and gratitude is indispensable to happiness.

Feminism raised women's expectations beyond what life can deliver to the vast majority of them. It was hard enough for women in the past to realize their far fewer expectations of marrying a good man and making a happy family. But feminism told a generation of women that they can not only expect to have that but, perhaps even more important to feminism, they could also expect to have a fulfilling, financially rewarding, society-honoring career.

I wish all Americans could hear the women who call my radio show who tell of how they were raised to believe this feminist promise, and therefore pursued often successful careers while delaying marriage.

And now at 35, 40, 45 years of age, they wonder why that career is so unfulfilling and now yearn for a man and family they put off having.

For most women — of course, not all — careers are not nearly as fulfilling as are a good marriage and family. The astronaut who destroyed her career — perhaps the most prestigious career in America for either a man or a woman — out of romantic jealousy is an extreme but instructive example.

Unless one believes that women and men are the same and therefore the same things bring them happiness, the feminist emphasis on career has been an obstacle to many women's happiness. As a rule, women derive most of their happiness from relationships, not from work. Men need both to be happy far more than women do. Men's very identity is predicated on their answer to the question, "What do you do?" Whether fair or not — to either sex — virtually no woman's identity is dependent on what she does for a living. That is why, while both sexes suffer financially from the loss of a job, when men lose their jobs, they often also lose their self-worth as a man. The greater importance of work to men is also manifested in their willingness to work many more hours than woman.

To make things even worse for many women, not only are most women not finding their careers nearly as fulfilling as they had been led to expect, they rarely find the demands of home life lessened much. Now many women experience double the pressure — having to succeed in jobs outside of the home and, as much as ever, inside the home. The feminist promise that everything in their marriage will be 50-50 — each partner will do half the outside work, half the housework, and half the child rearing — has rarely panned out. Most men will work their tails off outside the home, but won't inside the home. Consequently, many working women either experience increased tension with their husband or increased pressure to succeed both outside the home and inside the home as mother, homemaker, and wife.

Failed expectations are not the only reason many more women are depressed. But it is a big one. And there are more.

Dennis Prager hosts a nationally syndicated radio talk show based in Los Angeles. He is the author of four books, most recently "Happiness Is a Serious Problem" (HarperCollins). His Web site is www.pragerradio.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Well, I will begin by stating that among credible sources, including the American Psychiatric Association (APA), the National Institute for Mental Health (NIMH), and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV(DSMIV)...or any other source that I could find within the realm of mental health research cites "feminism" as the cause for higher numbers of women experiencing depression than men.

Really, the whole debate should end there. But to be fair, let's examine just what it is that Mr. Prager is saying here and why he feels as though he qualifies to draw such conclusions about women and why so many of them are depressed.

While Dennis Prager is a well educated man having studied at fine universities and institutions both within the U.S. and abroad, he holds no doctorate, certificate, license or any other credential that suggests he can make any sort of practical diagnosis of depression and why and how it affects women. So it can be reasonably deduced that the above analysis by Mr. Prager holds about as much water as me stating, "hmmm, I think that children suffer from depression because of religion".

While it is perfectly within my rights to make such a statement, and there are indeed personal and experiential events in my life that for me support that statement (as well as quite a few other experts with far more credibility than I possess that feel the same way), I would expect no one, least of all any audience I might be driving my point home to take what I am saying for anything other than what it is: Laymen drivel based on absolutely nothing empirical or credible.

That is unless, of course, my argument comes from empirical, credible evidence.

Mr. Prager brandishes no evidence to support what he is saying here, and that is important because he is discussing an issue that fundamentally demands that conclusions be drawn based upon important medical study and research. Once this laborious but necessary task has been exacted, appropriate opinions may then be drawn.

The only statement that Mr. Prager provides his audience that even attempts to lend a spine to his already feeble assertion is that he is "one who regularly talks to women, and about men and women, on my radio show" and to be someone who has "informally counseled women of all ages".

Well, I regularly talk to women to. I may not have a radio show, but many women have sought out my advice despite this apparent handicap in "expertise". I am not about to tell anyone, man or woman, that the status of their clinical mental health is due to feminism or the Civil Rights movement or the Minute Men or any other social/cultural movement in which its connotations may or may not advance my selfish political agenda. This appears to be precisely what Mr. Prager is doing here, however.

What I may indeed say to them, at any rate when it comes to this sort of subject, is "perhaps you should consider seeing a psychiatrist".

We all have opinions, and to be fair once again Mr. Prager is making his statements in an opinion column, after all. The thing about it is that it is an erroneous and unsubstantiated opinion steeped in nothing other than Mr. Prager's own misogyny and fear of women.

Add to that the not-so-coincidental current event in which a very empowered woman may very well be the next president of the United States. If Mr. Prager thinks that this column is anything other than a thinly veiled jab at that potential outcome, he is underestimating at least one member of his audience.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Gregory Armitage
Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:41 PM
Mr Prager, your critic represents the academic view that common sense can not be a guide in drawing conclusions. Your observations meet the test of common sense and thus anathema to your critics. Most men and woman will not have careers, they will have heavy lifting jobs that grind them down over a lifetime. In that a lot of jobs held by men involve more than a 40 hr week thus the prospect of 50-50 home chores sharing is unrealistic . Your critic cannot accept the truth anymore than many of the feminists cannot accept the biological thus mental differences between the sexes. Add political correctness and you have a nation headed for disfunctionalism.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Daniel Johnson
Thu Mar 13, 2008 6:43 PM
What makes Gregory assume misogyny or "fear of women" on Prager's part? I see no evidence of either. On the contrary, his argument is a stinging indictment of what feminism has done to women (as well as for them) over the last 40-odd years by improperly raising their expectations. A person doesn't need a doctorate degree to give his opinion, make observations, or draw conclusions, and that is all Prager has done. Prager does not pretend to offer a clinical diagnosis of depression nor prescribe a cure. He simply points out to women that society has done something cruel to them over the last couple of generations. Gregory seems to be assuming that a person needs an ASE mechanic's certification to credibly assert that a car won't run properly because it has a flat tire. Do you really need years of schooling to understand that? By the way, this fellow needs to dial down his diction a notch or two. His snotty-sounding word choice is impressing no one but himself.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Matt
Sun Mar 16, 2008 11:39 PM
Re: Matt

Matt said:"A person doesn't need a doctorate degree to give his opinion, make observations, or draw conclusions, and that is all Prager has done."

...after I had already said: "We all have opinions, and to be fair once again Mr. Prager is making his statements in an opinion column, after all."

Matt, did you read my comment in its entirety? Because that line specifically addresses your criticism, and did so before you even made it.

The point of my comments was to challenge Mr. Prager's assertion based on the idea that he is drawing conclusions about a subject, a specific subject, that demands research and is informed.

I took issue with his opinion because no one in the medical community, that I could find, is citing "feminism" as a cause for higher rates of depression in women.

I think that it's fair to challenge what Mr. Prager is saying, as well as to assert that there exists a hostile agenda behind drawing such conclusions. My opinion of the column is that Mr. Prager is attempting to undermine a valueable movement that has done a lot of good for millions of people, as well as insert seeds of doubt in the minds of voters in the current political climate. I could absolutely be wrong, of course, but considering the writer's MO, I think that perhaps I am not.

As for my "diction", I am quite happy with it, so I concur with your critique.

-GA
Comment: #4
Posted by: Gregory Armitage
Wed Mar 19, 2008 4:07 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Dennis Prager
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

11 May 2010 Left Is Certain of Tea Partiers' Motives, but Finds Terrorists Inscrutable

26 Jan 2010 An Open Letter to Charles Johnson

29 Jun 2010 If You Believe America Has Lousy Health Care, Here's Why ...