creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
27 Jul 2014
FBI: Gone Fishin' -- for Shrimp Boy and Whatever

The FBI's motto is "Fidelity, Bravery, Integrity." But given the FBI sting against Raymond "Shrimp Boy" Chow &#… Read More.

24 Jul 2014
Surge to the Border -- Crisis or Reunion?

Why isn't Mexico doing more to deter unaccompanied minors from Central America from traversing Mexico to … Read More.

22 Jul 2014
Rand Paul: Less Government, More Sharing Economy

Who will be the GOP nominee in 2016? I don't know, but I have a pretty good idea who the running mate will be:… Read More.

Will Dumb Cuts Trump Smart Cuts?

Comment

When Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., met with the San Francisco Chronicle's editorial board last week, she said reasonable people could pass a bill to apply $85 billion in sequester cuts more surgically. Too bad she's a member of Congress.

When Editorial Page Editor John Diaz asked whether she considers the scale of the cuts to be "reasonable and doable," she answered, "Yes, I do."

Alas, the Democrats' top budget man, Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., believes that cutting $85 billion out of a $3.6 trillion budget is unthinkable, even to slow the growth of the $16 trillion national debt. Asked about proposals to redo the cuts so they target waste, he told CNN, "Rearranging cuts is like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic."

President Barack Obama wants the cuts to be as painful as possible. In Newport News, Va., on Tuesday to speak before defense workers who might be laid off or furloughed, the president said, "Instead of cutting out the government spending we don't need — wasteful programs that don't work, special interest tax loopholes and tax breaks — what the sequester does is it uses a meat cleaver approach to gut critical investments in things like education and national security and lifesaving medical research." Yet he doesn't want the authority to target wasteful programs.

In Washington, Speier said, "Russian roulette is a favored pastime."

Then there's finger-pointing. House Speaker John Boehner likes to blame the Senate for not passing an alternative measure after the GOP House passed two bills to replace the across-the-board sequester cuts last year. But those bills included a poison pill; with their focus on cutting discretionary spending, they didn't have a prayer of passing the Democratic-led Senate.

Senate Democrats have a bill that smartly goes after farm subsidies but wrongly includes the "Buffett rule" to impose a minimum 30 percent tax rate on top investors.

That bill won't pass both houses, either.

Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., told me he is a co-sponsor of the House version of the Senate bill because Republicans have to meet Democrats "halfway." The 2012 election, the former prosecutor explained, was like a jury trial. Obama ran on the "Buffett rule." Obama won, so Democrats should go for it.

But that bill won't fly. And the president also ran on deficit reduction. Here's his chance.

Senate Republicans are expected to introduce legislation Thursday to give the president the authority to make smarter sequester cuts — whether Obama wants it or not. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he won't vote for such a bill. Reid, too, invoked the Titanic's deck chairs. To D.C. Dems, smart cuts are analogous to hitting an iceberg.

That's why Republicans will let the bad cuts happen if they must. They know that if Washington cannot pull off these modest cuts — already included in the Budget Control Act — they must abandon any notion of fiscal discipline.

Timing worked against Republicans during the fiscal cliff negotiations; they could agree to Obama's tax increases or to bigger automatic increases slated to begin Jan. 1, so they took the better deal.

The March 1 sequester start date works for the GOP. Don Stewart, spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, told me: "We are going to make these cuts. We can do it (Obama's way), or we can do it a smarter way."

Email Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
The American people are managing through a 2% tax hike, why can't the government do the same?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Thu Feb 28, 2013 9:12 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
Jul. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 30 Jul 2014
Patrick Buchanan
Pat BuchananUpdated 29 Jul 2014
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 29 Jul 2014

16 Jan 2014 Who Wants to Lose to Gov. Jerry Brown?

31 May 2010 I Read the Candidates' Books Ö so You Won't Have To

26 Aug 2007 Bookless Versus Clueless