creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
16 Feb 2012
President Obama Punts on US Deficit

In February 2009 — having signed into law his $787 billion stimulus package — President Barack … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
Obama Imposes Will in Contraception Compromise

From San Francisco, where I live, the controversy over the White House decision to require church-affiliated … Read More.

12 Feb 2012
To Make Women Safe, We Treat Them Like Children

The domestic-violence case against San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi did not start with a call from wife … Read More.

When Big Government Goes Bad

Share Comment

"It does seem to me like the government overreacted here," Judge E. Grady Jolly of the federal 5th Circuit Court of Appeals remarked Monday, according to The Associated Press. Grady is on a three-judge panel considering an appeal filed by two Border Patrol agents serving 11- and 12-year sentences for shooting at and wounding a drug smuggler fleeing across the border. The trial judge's decision to bar questions exploring the smuggler's other dealings, Judge Patrick Higginbotham opined, "strikes me as relevant."

No lie.

Finally, a ray of hope for Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean. On Feb. 17, 2005, the two Border Patrol Agents shot at Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila as he ran toward the Texas-Mexico border after ditching a van containing 743 pounds of marijuana.

In 2006, a jury convicted the agents on charges of assault with a dangerous weapon, discharge of a firearm during a violent crime, obstructing justice, lying about the incident and willfully violating Aldrete's Fourth Amendment right to be free from illegal seizure. The jury apparently did not buy the agents' claim to have seen a shiny object — which they feared was a gun — in Aldrete's hand.

The big question is whether jurors would have ruled against Ramos and Compean if they had heard cross-examination likely to have punctured Aldrete's self-portrayal as a down-on-his-luck professional truck driver with a sick mom in need of a quick $1,000 to $1,500.

Ramos and Compean supporters have argued that Aldrete was no innocent. Their view was bolstered last month, when the feds arrested Aldrete on charges that he was running hundreds of pounds of marijuana across the border while he enjoyed a "humanitarian visa" — issued at the feds' urging to facilitate U.S. doctors treating the gunshot wound in his buttocks.

Now, to believe the smuggler's story, you have to believe that Mexican drug kingpins just happened to hand more product to a man who had left 743 pounds of marijuana in Texas in 2005 — as if cartels are big on second chances.

Even at trial, Aldrete testified that Border Patrol agent Rene Sanchez told him that he could file a lawsuit and helped him find the lawyer who represented Aldrete, who was suing the government for $5 million.

He had motive to lie.

The Associated Press also reported that Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Stelmach admitted to the 5th Circuit that Aldrete had told "some lies" to investigators.

Americans across the country have voiced outrage at the very notion that the federal government would grant limited immunity and a border pass to a veracity-challenged drug smuggler so that he could testify against two Border Patrol agents whose careers have been dedicated to keeping the border safe.

At the very worst, Ramos and Compean made a bad split-second decision and knowingly fired at an unarmed fleeing suspect — and then covered it up. But to believe the worst, you have to believe the tort-happy smuggler's claim that he was not armed or carrying a cell phone.

T.J. Bonner, the chief of the Border Patrol agents' union, noted last week that if the three-judge panel affirms the appeal, Department of Justice prosecutors will have to decide to retry the case or let it go. "If they're smart, they will let it go, because if they don't, everything comes in."

President Bush now has the opportunity to commute the sentences of Ramos and Compean before the panel acts — after two judges have signaled their dissatisfaction with the prosecution. A commutation would help Bush within and outside his conservative base. Not only have many GOP lawmakers asked for a pardon, but Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., also has joined them.

Bonner added that whether Bush "is going to swallow his stubborn pride remains to be seen."

Ramos and Compean have spent nearly a year in isolation in prison. If they had been corrupt agents who cut deals with human smugglers, they no doubt would have cut a deal for shorter sentences. Instead, they must spend 11 and 12 years away from their wives and children — and among those whom they once apprehended. If they killed someone — or if they were professional smugglers who could turn in other drug players — they'd probably face shorter time.

President Bush should commute their sentences and get these men home for the holidays. Or he can punt and let federal judges do what should be done.

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2007 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

9 Jun 2007 Poor Room Service

22 Feb 2007 Democrats' dilemma on Iraq

11 Oct 2009 Lose at the Ballot, Push! for Payback at the Bench