creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
14 Feb 2012
Obama Imposes Will in Contraception Compromise

From San Francisco, where I live, the controversy over the White House decision to require church-affiliated … Read More.

12 Feb 2012
To Make Women Safe, We Treat Them Like Children

The domestic-violence case against San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi did not start with a call from wife … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Shaky Grounds for Prop. 8 Ruling

Two of three judges on a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel on Tuesday found Proposition 8 unconstitutional.… Read More.

Some Get the Tea, Others Get the Bag

Share Comment

In December 1773, Bostonians held a Tea Party in Boston Harbor to protest excessive British taxes. "No taxation without representation" was their message. On Wednesday, April 15, Americans will hold rallies across the country to protest onerous taxes. Organizers have a motto for their Tea Day — "taxed enough already."

Big problem: There is a world of difference between 1773 and 2009. Two hundred-plus years ago, Americans risked life and limb protesting a distant and oligarchic system of government that did not represent the good people of Massachusetts.

In 2009, the federal government is dysfunctional because, if anything, Washington is too representative of the American voter, who has come to expect both more government and lower taxes.

The Tea Day agenda — www.teapartyday.com — is a call to arms to Americans who are fed up with a president and Congress who "are spending trillions of borrowed dollars, leaving a debt our great-grandchildren will be paying" and expanding the size and scope of the federal government. It plays to the anger felt by taxpayers who resent the runaway growth of government — for good reason. Too bad it is inconsistent to complain about the deficit and taxes.

No doubt many who show up at the Tea Day rallies will argue that they didn't vote for Obama and should not have to pay for his programs. I have news for you folks: Conservatives lost. American voters elected a big spender and, one way or another, Americans will have to pay for his agenda. The Obama tax hikes on Americans earning more than $250,000 have yet to materialize — but when they do, they'll be taxation with representation, a campaign pledge made good.

Do I like it? Absolutely not. I believe that Obama's soak-the-rich approach will be bad for the economy. And so apparently does Obamaland, it seems, as the administration has decided to postpone Obama's promised tax increases until the Bush tax cuts expire.

Sorry, folks, but the Democrats have co-opted the anti-tax cause.

The result isn't lower taxes or smaller government. The result is that Democrats use the power of the White House and Congress to push for bigger government, which Democratic constituents don't bankroll. Thanks to Obama's "Making Work Pay," about half of American households will pay no federal income tax at all. Those families have every incentive to support bigger government, secure in the knowledge that only others will pony up.

Folks who aren't likely to show up at the April 15 protests have benefited most from anti-tax fever. Former GOP House Speaker Newt Gingrich has hit the airwaves to advocate for the Tea Party. When charlatans like Gingrich climb on the bandwagon, you should always check the wheels.

This is the same guy who, along with Speaker Nancy Pelosi, appeared in global-warming ads, and told Americans, "If enough of us demand action from our leaders, we can spark the innovation we need." Now he's leading a protest against proposed carbon taxes. He ping-pongs from one side to the other like the American voter — for a cause, until it bears difficult consequences.

Tea Day organizers are telling supporters to send tea bags to Washington. You can sponsor a tea bag for $1. On the one hand, it's great that citizens want to participate and let their views be known — as long as conservatives don't equate their protest with that of patriots who risked it all for their revolutionary beliefs in pursuit of democratic representation.

The Tea Day's list of woes includes the government wanting "to take your wealth and redistribute it." Good, I just wish the list included tenets that call for some sacrifice or responsibility on the right. But the list does not call, as former Bush spokesman Ari Fleischer did in the Wall Street Journal on Monday, for Congress to reject Obama's pledge to decrease taxes for 95 percent of the country, out of the conviction that every American should pay income taxes.

I don't like the new Obama programs either, but political leaders must recognize that someone is going to have to pay for them, and patriots can't tout an agenda with no sacrifice.

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
I'm a big fan of Debra Saunders but I'm confused about what point she is trying to make. I'm actually suprised to see her repeat the liberal talking points.

I don't think anyone is tyring to compare these Tea Party protests to the Revolutionary War and setting up straw men like Gingrich misses the point that these protests originated with individuals not with the Republican Party. The old joke that "both Republicans and Democrats will spend every dime in the Treasury - the only difference is that the Republicans will tell you how sorry they were to do it" is operative here.
The protests are not about avoiding sacrifice but rather sending a message to elected officials that they are overreaching. If Debra thinks conceding defeat to the big spenders is all we have left well, she knows enough to expect them to reach for even more until the wheels finally fall off the system.
She may be right that it is too late to save us from financial calamity but I don't see the advantage in sitting on our hands and bemoaning our fate. Better to let the legislators know that people are upset. Worries about getting reelected seem to be the only thing that motivates them to do the right thing.
This isn't about "no taxation without representation" it's about "no GREATER taxataion without RESPONSIBLE representation" and voting the big spenders out of office.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Kent Grealish
Tue Apr 14, 2009 11:39 AM
Ma'am;... You express the opinion: " I believe Obama'a soak the rich approach will be bad for the economy"...Okay; since we have not had a soak the rich approach at any time in recent history, what is your explanation for the sorry state of the economy??? Did the economy get rotten on good medicine???Is the cure good; but the patient beyond repair???I read a lot of history, and I can offer many examples of societies that died from too many poor, but none that died from too few rich...Why do you not agree that it takes some wealth to achieve the good for which this country was formed??? Why don't you agree that government is formed for good??? The fact is that our government was formed for a more perfect union, to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provie for defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessing of liberty...Do you really believe that the denial of these goods to the people comes at less of a cost than their general acquistion??? Property was once taxed, and that tax either supported the government, or forced property into poorer hands where it would support the population... Now, Property can sit for years paying so little of taxes that it does not need to be plowed... Where property must support a city, people are free to abandon it, and go to some other location more favoraable to their will... Their rights are strictly protected, but their obligation is never enforced, so it is the poor who suffer taxes, and taxes on their meager wages helps to cut a chasm between the rich and the poor.... The country must still support the people whether it is in private hands or public hands...It is better that the property be in many private hands rather than a few...Property is never obligation free... Wealth is never obligation free...The goal of this country is clearly stated; but the price of denying those goals is extreme for the country, and if the rich will not pay for the benefits they alone recieve, and the poor cannot pay because they have no benefit from society; then we should just roll up the mess in the rug and trash it... Look at the burden of this society...The greatest part of it is defense and law enforcement; and again, it is the rich who benefit from these services...It is people without wealth who defend the wealth...It is people without property whe must bear the price of protecting property....While the poor suffer crime to a much greater degree than the rich, and the rich recieve much greater police protection, there are more private police in this country than public police....Does anyone believe the rich do not have their private armies???The whole U.S. army is their army enforcing their will for which they are not even troubled to pay...And while defense is a minor cost, the offense they force upon this country is a major cost... I am not against the antitax movement... I know the rich hope to rally the poor to protect them from any sort of just taxation...I hape instead that the whole government that protects the rich is swept away... The private armies that protect the rich from the rath of the poor would all go home if the government could not keep the dollar as legal tender...If the government could not be corrupted with dollars, and could not in turn corrupt the leaders of other countries against their populations then the whole mess of rich and government would fall.. As I see it, the rich do not pay taxes so long as they can bribe government from its stated goals...If the burden of taxes was carried by the ability to pay, the poor would be free of taxes...But the rich are rich, often with hereditary wealth because they do not pay their share and their support of their society....If they do not like it, and we do not like it; we should together let it fall..See if some new governemnt does not tax them more cruelly....Quit letting the rich hide behind the desparate need of the poor for tax relief... Make them pay, or drive them out.... Wealth in the hands of the rich supports only them... It must still support the whole country...And great fortunes have been built upon little taxes, and on the denied goals of this entire country... Let us get on course, and discard these loafers... Thanks....Sweeney
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:09 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

2 Mar 2010 Why Americans Hate Washington

8 May 2008 Gas-Tax Holiday a Loser

26 Feb 2008 He Started It