creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
14 Feb 2012
Obama Imposes Will in Contraception Compromise

From San Francisco, where I live, the controversy over the White House decision to require church-affiliated … Read More.

12 Feb 2012
To Make Women Safe, We Treat Them Like Children

The domestic-violence case against San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi did not start with a call from wife … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Shaky Grounds for Prop. 8 Ruling

Two of three judges on a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel on Tuesday found Proposition 8 unconstitutional.… Read More.

Sarah Palin -- Dream Girl

Share Comment

MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL — Bingo.

For weeks, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has been the Republican whom conservatives barely dared to hope could become John McCain's pick as his running mate.

For Republicans angry at Washington's big-spending bonanza when Republicans controlled the White House and Congress, Palin, like McCain, is an antidote. She is the Alaskan who pulled state support for the infamous Bridge to Nowhere and bucked Alaska's congressional and state Republican leaders.

For social conservatives, the mother of five has impeccable credentials. She's a member of Feminists for Life, who walked the walk in April when she gave birth to a son, shown by genetic testing to have Down syndrome. "I'm looking at him right now, and I see perfection," she said of her son, Trig. "Yeah, he has an extra chromosome. I keep thinking, in our world, what is normal and what is perfect?"

For conservatives, who felt that McCain has been at times too cozy with the Washington left, Palin is a conservative's conservative — a moose hunter and co-owner of a commercial fishing operation.

As an Alaskan, she favors drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Her husband works for BP on an Alaska oil field. Yet, as the Almanac of American Politics has reported, she stood up to Big Oil when she supported a natural gas pipeline instead of an oil pipeline backed by the state's major petroleum interests. McCain has been too much of a wishful thinker when it comes to energy policy. Palin could champion a more grounded approach to energy.

As a female candidate, Palin just might attract disgruntled Hillary Rodham Clinton supporters — or at least give them pause before voting for the Obama-Biden ticket.

After Barack Obama picked Joe Biden as his running mate, I began to steel myself for the possibility that McCain might make a similarly uninspiring, but seemingly safe, choice. The top pick of Beltway insiders was former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, a strong campaigner with solid economic credentials — but flawed by what seemed an opportunistic shift to the right on social issues in order to win the GOP primary.

Former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge supports abortion rights — a plus for me — but he likely would be the butt of late-night talk-show jokes because of the color-coded federal warning system devised to alert Americans to the likelihood of terrorist attacks when he was director of Homeland Security. Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty looked OK — but he wasn't Sarah Palin.

Is she short on experience? Yes. Voters will have to watch her performance on the campaign trail to judge how she responds to high-stakes politics and the international arena.

That said, as a governor, Palin she has more experience running a government than Obama, who began serving his first term in the U.S. Senate in 2005. And unlike Obama, Palin has shown herself willing to challenge her jaded ethical policies within her party. That's change.

As McCain said Friday, Palin is "exactly who this country needs" to help him confront "the same old Washington politics of me first and country second."

On the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, she investigated fellow commission member Randy Ruedrich, the state Republican Party chairman, in an effort that led to his resignation and paying a $12,000 fine levied by Alaska's attorney general. In 2006, she ran against the incumbent Republican governor, Frank Murkowski — and won.

She is not a hard-core social conservative. For example, Palin supported awarding benefits for same-sex couples. But she is a good fiscal conservative, who used her veto power to reduce her state's budget by $124 million.

Palin is a maverick, like he's a maverick. She complements McCain's ardent opposition, not only to congressional earmarks, but also to the pork-rich farm bill and ethanol subsidies supported by Obama.

Pollster Frank Luntz told me in Denver that the key to victory for McCain is to trumpet one theme — "accountability." McCain, he said, should promise government that does what it is supposed to do, punishes bad actors who break the rules and ends "wasteful Washington spending." On that score, Palin was made to order.

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Yet another Republican Theocrat on a major national ticket...and, of course, you right wing lug nuts love it.

I am rather intrigued by the "accountability" quote at the end of this tripe....We true blue Democrats can only hope that the McCain camp--and Conservatives in general---take Mr. Luntz's advice.

Accountability is--

Republicans OWNING the decisions to remove "pay-go" from the policy's of the congress 15 years ago--allowing their lobbyist buddies to loot the treasury without having to off-set the new corporate welfare with either program cuts or tax increases. Thankfully, the Democrats OWN the decision to re-instate this key fiscal safeguard their 2nd day of return to control in 2006

Republicans OWNING the decision to borrow money from china to fund a war in Iraq--a country that did not, and could not, attack us or be a credible threat in the mid-east and thus destroying our economy, allowing the Afghanistan/Pakistan front of the REAL war on terror to be slighted on both troops and reconstruction funding.
Thankfully, the Democrats have, over the last 2 years, been able to reduce the Iraq expenditures if not end them--and diverted those funds to domestic priorities and the anti-terror war that REALLY MATTERS to our National Security and the Security of the region.

Republicans OWNING the decision to spend 10 BILLION dollars per month on reconstruction in Iraq--while blocking all attempts to fund 2 BILLION dollars to re-build American Schools in the inner cities--- begging the question "why are Iraqi children more important than American Children to the Republicans"? Who in the McCain/Palin/Bush/Cheney group will take accountability for that question? Bush Pushed the agenda, Cheney lobbied congress for the decision, McCain voted for the choice made--Palin's hands are clean--she hadn't served in elected office yet--and so are Obama's and Biden's--they led the fight to reverse this decision---Accountability and Experience DO COUNT--Mr. Luntz is right.

Yes, Ms. Saunders--let's PUHLEASE talk about accountability--Going from an 900 million annual surplus that was allowing us to pare down the National Debt that our Children will have to pay if we don't---to a 1 TRILLION dollar deficit in just 15 years---Let's see you Conservative Accountability mavens speak to that imperiling of America's future generations.

How about close to 2 trillion dollars in "grants" and other welfare to Fortune 500 companies---while we gutted the 90 billion dollar annual social safety net for the poorest among us? Can you make this Conservative/Gilded Age congress and administration accept responsibilty for those poor children going hungry and families going without medical care to finance Exxon Mobiles operations while Exxon is making close to 160 billion annually in net profits?

Shame on you all---for viewing accountability as valid only when it relates to the poor and the middle class--and to individuals on the other side of the political divide...but not to your pill addicted radio "heros" (read SCUM) like Limbaugh or your corrupt political classes or to the million dollar lobbyists whose trough you feed at----What a Sick Group of scum bags your party and you are.

Comment: #1
Posted by: Bruce Stone
Tue Sep 2, 2008 4:20 AM
Ms. Saunders does not present all the facts. Sarah Palin was a big supporter of the bridge to nowhere before the audacity of the project was exposed to the project. She was a fundraiser for Ted Stevens, who appeared in political ads with her.
The town of 6,000 people of which she was mayor has received millions of dollars in earmarks. Why should $1,600,000 in Federal money be spent for bus facilities in a town too small to need a bus?
Sarah Palin is more of the same Republican politics that is leading this country to ruin. Nothing more needs to be said about her.
Comment: #2
Posted by: ImWondering
Tue Sep 2, 2008 5:01 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

21 Oct 2008 McCain Sticks to His Guns

14 Nov 2010 Two Wonks with One Plan About Too Much Debt

12 Jun 2011 At Least 4 Good Reasons To End the War on Drugs