creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
14 Feb 2012
Obama Imposes Will in Contraception Compromise

From San Francisco, where I live, the controversy over the White House decision to require church-affiliated … Read More.

12 Feb 2012
To Make Women Safe, We Treat Them Like Children

The domestic-violence case against San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi did not start with a call from wife … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Shaky Grounds for Prop. 8 Ruling

Two of three judges on a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel on Tuesday found Proposition 8 unconstitutional.… Read More.

Revenge of the Boxes

Share Comment

Ever since California voters recalled Democratic Gov. Gray Davis in 2003 and replaced him with Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sacramento has been passing gimmicky state budgets that did not raise taxes, but also kicked structural deficit spending into the next year.

Well, the party's over.

In September, Schwarzenegger signed another kick-the-shortfall budget. Then the Wall Street meltdown caused capital gains to disappear, rich people's income to retract and state revenues to shrink. As the Legislative Analyst reported this week, the state budget shortfall could reach $28 billion over the next two years. State Department of Finance spokesman H.D. Palmer noted the drop in state revenue represents "not a trend, but a seismic event."

The earth has moved. The anti-tax governator has called a special session to address the budget shortfall, and he has renewed his call for the Legislature to raise taxes. Schwarzenegger has proposed more than $10 billion in spending cuts on education, health care and social spending through 2010. And $14 billion in tax increases, including a "temporary" 11/2-cent increase in the sales tax, an extension of the sales tax on such services as car repairs and veterinary (but not legal) bills, a severance tax on oil production and a 5-cents-per-drink spike in the tax on alcohol.

Why not squeeze the rich more? In California, the top 1 percent of taxpayers pays 40 percent of personal income taxes — which makes revenues rise and plunge wildly. A sales tax is more stable and would force those in the underground economy to contribute to the services they nonetheless enjoy.

On Tuesday, Legislative Analyst Mac Taylor released a report that presented other options. Schwarzenegger's 11/2-cent increase, Taylor noted, would increase the average state and local sales tax to about 9.5 percent — the highest average rate in the country. Therefore "the Legislature should also consider a smaller sales tax increase, say a 1-cent increase." Taylor also suggested a temporary 5 percent income tax surcharge and raising the vehicle license fee from .65 percent to 1 percent.

Hey, maybe the money will fall from the sky. Assembly Speaker Karen Bass thinks Washington can fork over $5 billion per year for three years.

If Washington can reward Wall Street greed, why not capital greed? Although, that still won't balance Sacramento's books.

State Finance Director Michael C. Genest has put together a slide show that takes on budget myths, including the oft-heard complaint that state spending is out of control. Nonsense, Genest argued, spending "has been brought under control in the past couple of years." A chart shows general fund spending at $101.4 billion in fiscal year 2006-07, $103.3 billion in 2007-08 and $103.4 billion in 2008-09. If the new proposed cuts are enacted, spending for the 2008-09 budget will fall to $98.9 billion.

The chart doesn't show the $71 billion general fund that Schwarzenegger inherited five years ago, before state spending per resident grew 33 percent.

When he took office, Schwarzenegger promised that he would not just shuffle departments, but that he would "blow up boxes" to reform state government. He created a California Performance Review, which issued recommendations that were supposed to save $32 billion over five years. Then Schwarzenegger failed to follow through. Maybe the projected savings never would have materialized, but Schwarzenegger couldn't even dump the advisory boards that he had boasted he would eliminate.

As Joel Fox, a GOP strategist and editor of Foxandhoundsdaily.com, told me, Schwarzenegger should have cut spending early on; he "should have spent (his political) capital up front, and he'd be better off for it."

Today, many Republicans are making the same argument as they oppose any tax increases. Fox remembers how the same right wing "sat on their hands" when Schwarzenegger's budget reform measure was on the ballot in 2005.

"Then he's defeated," Fox added, "and he moves in a different direction, and they all beat him up."

Democratic lawmakers seem willing to go along with Schwarzenegger's spending cuts. Their dirty little secret is: They don't want to raise taxes, either.

They've been able to expand government precisely because Republicans have assured the public that taxpayers will never have to pay for new programs.

Schwarzenegger has learned that when he does his job best, his poll ratings fall. He set out to blow up the boxes, but in the end, the boxes blew up on him.

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Ma'am;... If you rich folks think it does not work for you, then think of how it feels to carry the whole stupid country on your back with your labor, and pay all the taxes in the process, and then, not have it work for you.... I'm so sorry if you people have to pay taxes on the profit you squeeze from us... Consider this: If you paid us more, maybe we would have more to support the government with.... Only twenty percent of our economy actually comes from production and the rest is service of some sort... That twenty percent supports the other eighty percent; and of that twenty percent, over 90% is exported or shall I say, was exported... Now does it not seem a little retarded to try to support the whole nation on twenty percent of the economy??? Because that is the way it is... Only when you produce goods and values do you carry all the non productive services... But across the board, wages have been driven down so that 50% off the people never make enough to qualify for income taxes... Never mind you say... Rather than tax the rich who have money, tax the poor who have nothing with a sales tax, except, what ever you set the sales tax at, if they cannot afford to buy, it will not pay much of taxes... Why not consider that perhaps it is not good for society to produce mostly services??? Why not consider that driving wages lower and lower, and lower until more people than ever are on the edge of poverty -has never worked for any society??? Why not consider that the more rich we have the more they demand their wealth, and feel entitled to their wealth without obligation to society??? They cannot get the big picture... They cannot see the damage they do... Some one should draw them a sketch.... Show the rich as a man on top of a centapede, or even a whole army of centapedes to represent all the working people.... And show the centapedes with a big zero representing all the free money the working people have to support society.... Then show the rich with a big plus sign to represent all the money they have invested, or in the bank, or buying t-bills.... Now, the rich only need so much, and money they have invested is a negative because that means interest profit has to be squeezed out of the centapedes, who have nothing... But in addition, there is the government, and you can draw that as a man with a gun, and he wants to get paid.... In fact he has to get paid or everything goes to hell and the centapedes end up all over the rich guy looking for lunch... So what do you think is going to happen, realistically??? Is the government going to give up and take nothing??? Clearly the centapedes are stepped on, but if they are not going to give up and start over, you folks, the rich folks and your government have got to find some one to step on besides the poor, because now the poor are too poor... For what we get out of the deal we don't need any of you... We can go roll in the mud if we begin to miss our parasites, and we will pick up something....Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:35 PM
All true Saunders. How long did it take you to come to this great discovery?
Comment: #2
Posted by: Masako
Sat Nov 15, 2008 10:36 AM
Ma'am; .. I am no wile coyotte or anything; but if the facts for the rest of the country hold true, that the top one half of one percent has the same income as the bottom fifty percent, why shouldn't they pay fifty percent of the taxes at least, and more for the top one percent total??? I think you guys like figures as long as they can be used to paint a false picture of what is happening... What do you think???...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:27 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Terence Jeffrey
Terence JeffreyUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Alan Reynolds
Alan ReynoldsUpdated 15 Feb 2012

14 Oct 2007 Nanny State Becomes Granny State

30 Oct 2007 Arnold's Marijuana Fig Leaf

28 Dec 2006 Ford, Politics and the Pardon