creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
14 Feb 2012
Obama Imposes Will in Contraception Compromise

From San Francisco, where I live, the controversy over the White House decision to require church-affiliated … Read More.

12 Feb 2012
To Make Women Safe, We Treat Them Like Children

The domestic-violence case against San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi did not start with a call from wife … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Shaky Grounds for Prop. 8 Ruling

Two of three judges on a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel on Tuesday found Proposition 8 unconstitutional.… Read More.

Political War Vets

Share Comment

Members of President Obama's Cabinet are three times more likely to have attended law school than boot camp. How things have changed since 2004, when Democrats were outraged that, in time of war, the GOP White House could be run by men with no combat experience. Saying that he was "reporting for duty," while speaking at the Democratic National Convention in Boston, Sen. John F. Kerry, D-Mass., made much of his combat experience, as others criticized President George W. Bush for only serving in the Air National Guard during Vietnam. From the Senate floor, Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., called Vice President Dick Cheney a "chicken hawk" in light of Cheney's five draft deferments during the Vietnam War.

In 2009, America is still at war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Yet somehow the military-background imperative is gone. President Obama never served in the military. Vice President Joe Biden, the Associated Press reported last year, received five student draft deferments during the Vietnam War. Just like Cheney.

As for the Obama Cabinet, according to administration biographies, only two of its 16 members — Defense Secretary Robert Gates (originally a Bush appointee) and Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki — have military experience. Add the six officials that the Obama administration considers to be Cabinet rank, and the total remains. Two.

By contrast, the first Cabinet of George W. Bush included six military veterans — seven when you add his first Homeland Security Secretary, Tom Ridge.

A White House spokesperson noted that it has many vets within the administration — such as National Security Adviser James Jones, National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair, Matthew Flavin at the Department of Defense, Assistant Veterans Affairs Secretary Tammy Duckworth and senior foreign policy adviser Mark Lippert.

I should note: I chose to compare Cabinets because the list is not subjective.

And the Cabinet choices reflect the presidents' views as to who should govern this country and the type of people with whom they choose to surround themselves.

Why the difference in the makeup of veterans in the two administrations' Cabinets? Figure generational differences are at play, as some Obama appointees were too young for Vietnam-era service. I thought gender might account for the lower number of vets, but both Bush and Obama chose four women to serve in their first Cabinets.

Me? I've never served in the military. I also have never had a military-service litmus test for political candidates, although I do see military experience as a strong plus.

Yet the political conversation goes from partisans fiercely advocating for the need for military service, and then, poof, it's gone.

In 2004, Democrats were saluting Kerry and trashing Bush and Cheney for their lack of combat experience. Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe called Bush "AWOL" during Vietnam — unbothered by the fact that his former boss, President Bill Clinton, evaded National Guard service.

In 2008, only two Democrats running for president — former Sen. Mike Gravel and Sen. Chris Dodd — had any military experience. None of the top three contenders — Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and John Edwards — was a veteran.

In 2009, America is still at war in Iraq and Afghanistan. America has a president with no military experience and a vice president with five draft deferrals. But I don't think you'll be hearing the term "chicken hawk." And that's OK with me. It always was a phony issue.

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
The Democrats did NOT start that war!
Comment: #1
Posted by: Arunice M Sharpe
Tue May 19, 2009 3:25 AM
Ma'am... Get off the shot glasses, and try to understand that the democrats are not hawks at all... They fight out of necessity, and in this case political necessity...They are purely stupid if they have not got the sense to lay out the facts to the American people and admit that we cannot afford this war and are being beaten for no possible gain... They lack the courage exactly for the reason you make evident, that if one spends all their effort and time refuting false charges they will accomplish nothing...It is better for them to stand by while our military is ground to pieces than to defend doing the right thing to the right field, and to all the blowhards that level baseless charges against them...I have never sworn an oath to uphold the constitution, and perhaps I never shall... From my perspective, most of those who swear such an oath never abide by it for a moment... If I swore such an oath you can bet I would not see any American in harms way out of fear of the right, and their gaggle of geese pecking at my actions... Those who lack the courage to defend their actions and to go on the atttack against the fools who have run this country into every available ditch, and point out their criminal behavior, which is your criminal behavior, giving support and comfort to the domestic enemies of this country and this people- are not fit for leadership... Plato had Socrates rail at the Athenian leaders for not making the people more virtuous...I offer the same charge to you, to Mr. Obama, and Mr. Bush: How can anyone expect virtue if they will not give truth???Who will dare tell the people that it is not just, or cheap, or virtuous to attack ones world neighbors???Who will tell them when victory is unlikely, and that the time has come to wrap up and come home??? Divided government has given us government top heavy and fearful of every tremor, and change in the wind... So people like yourself knowing nothing of death demand that young people die for no end, and no gain, and effectively push government toward doing the wrong thing...Paranoia suggests there are some people who do not want good from government, and want government to be divided and unable to do good... But government in such a condition cannot resist any push to do wrong to others without our protection of rights... And government in such a condition cannot defend itself in its desire to do the right and the good for this people and the world... So we persist in stupidity, and does that gain your support, or do you only find another cause for antagonism... Where were you on the subject of pursuing pointless war under Mr. Bush??? Can you tell the truth and not be shamed???Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue May 19, 2009 5:26 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Alan Reynolds
Alan ReynoldsUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Terence Jeffrey
Terence JeffreyUpdated 15 Feb 2012

15 Mar 2007 Don't Ask, Don't Tell -- for the Devout

18 Oct 2011 Scrapping CLASS Act Is the Right Thing To Do

30 Jan 2011 Where Judicial Activism Morphs into Disregard