creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
27 May 2012
When Will Obama Reform Presidential Pardons?

As a candidate for president in 2008, Barack Obama pledged to "immediately" review federal … Read More.

24 May 2012
In the House, Is 80 Over the Hill?

When Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., lost the GOP primary to challenger Richard Mourdock this month, Beltway … Read More.

22 May 2012
Democrats' War on Money

Cory Booker, mayor of Newark, N.J., came across as a moderate, sensible Democrat when he said on "Meet … Read More.

Occupy Wall Street: All Bite, No Apple

Share Comment

As Occupy Wall Street activists clogged New York's Zuccotti Park protesting "corporate greed" and Occupy SF hit San Francisco's Financial District on Wednesday protesting "corporate greed," the world learned that Steve Jobs, perhaps America's most beloved modern capitalist, had died at age 56.

The protesters claim to represent the working people, the 99 percent of Americans who, according to their blog, are getting kicked out of their homes, must choose between groceries and rent and "are working long hours for little pay and no rights," if they're working at all. They "are getting nothing while the other 1 percent is getting everything."

"We are the 99 percent," they proclaim.

Jobs was probably about 0.000000000001 percent.

Yet Jobs and the 99 percenters have much in common. These activists represent the iGeneration. They grew up with iPods and laptops. They're tweeting from smartphones. They've grown up with pricey new gadgets and monthly plans that keep them plugged into Wi-Fi and 4G.

They carry signs and post their stories on the Web about the five-figure debt that they've incurred — some for tuition that hasn't landed them a good job, others in credit card debt — and they're angry that Washington bailed out Wall Street but hasn't done much for them.

Like members of the tea party, they're angry with Washington. But they're also scared, not the way tea partyers fear losing their hard-earned assets, but in the way young people are fearful in a bleak economy. "Is 'Following Your Dreams' supposed to be this Terrifying?" one young woman's sign reads. "$60,000-plus in debt from my student loans and 11 percent interest rate."

At a news conference Thursday, President Barack Obama said the OWS protests express "the frustrations that the American people feel."

Tea Party Express strategist Sal Russo sees the "occupiers" as yet another effort, bolstered by organized labor and MoveOn.org, to establish a tea party on the left — with the help of a complicit news media that often painted his co-believers with unflattering stereotypes.

"They would say that (the) tea party is people who wear Colonial hats, have signs and are a bunch of nuts," Russo observed.

Obama played that game two years ago when he quoted a letter he had received from a woman who told him, "I don't want government-run health care. I don't want socialized medicine. And don't touch my Medicare."

The Occupy Wall Street movement has its standouts, too. Its website features an unofficial list of demands, which include not only a universal single-payer health care system and free college education but also open borders, "immediate across-the-board debt forgiveness for all" and outlawing all credit reporting agencies. Former Weather Underground radical Bill Ayers issued a "collective statement" that "a democratic government derives its just power from the people, but corporations do not seek consent to extract wealth from the people and the Earth; and that no true democracy is attainable when the process is determined by economic power." So don't tell me that the right has a monopoly on crazy talk.

Or that the Dems, unlike the GOP, don't have a problem with their base.

Besides, though the manifestos provide plenty of fodder for scoffing, they distract from the protest's sad personal stories. The "We Are The 99 Percent" shows a gallery of anguish felt by people who are struggling — even losing the struggle — to stay above water.

Now, I think these folks are wrong to believe that more government from Washington is the answer to their problems. They say they want to restore the American dream, but their remedy looks too much like the Greek nightmare.

As Russo noted, "their big claim is that they think we need to have a bigger, more intrusive government in our lives." After four years of George W. Bush and Obama's increasing federal spending exponentially while the economy floundered, it should be clear that model has failed. Mainstream America will not follow the occupier playbook.

Voters may sympathize with these unemployed kids — but they're not going to toss them the keys to the car.

As Jobs advised students in his famous 2005 commencement speech at Stanford University, you may be scared and you will make mistakes, but "don't be trapped by dogma."

Email Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Corporations don't "extract money" from the public; they get the money people freely spend. Yes, we don't have much of a choice with utilities, but we choose how much of their product we use (and they are heavily regulated.) And even what "corporations extract from the earth" has been purchased or regulated at some point by someone. Do they think that public money appears from thin air on demand? Do they understand the concept that even corporations do some sort of work to earn income? That if they are not doing something useful to justify their income, somebody is working and paying?
Comment: #1
Posted by: partsmom
Sun Oct 9, 2011 10:57 PM
Corporations don't "extract money" from the public; they get the money people freely spend. Yes, we don't have much of a choice with utilities, but we choose how much of their product we use (and they are heavily regulated.) And even what "corporations extract from the earth" has been purchased or regulated at some point by someone. Do they think that public money appears from thin air on demand? Do they understand the concept that even corporations do some sort of work to earn income? That if they are not doing something useful to justify their income, somebody is working and paying?
Comment: #2
Posted by: partsmom
Sun Oct 9, 2011 10:57 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

27 Oct 2011 The Case for Republican Panic

27 Feb 2007 Josh Wolf -- Blogger -- Has No Press Pass

27 Aug 2009 The State Prison Mess