creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
27 May 2012
When Will Obama Reform Presidential Pardons?

As a candidate for president in 2008, Barack Obama pledged to "immediately" review federal … Read More.

24 May 2012
In the House, Is 80 Over the Hill?

When Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., lost the GOP primary to challenger Richard Mourdock this month, Beltway … Read More.

22 May 2012
Democrats' War on Money

Cory Booker, mayor of Newark, N.J., came across as a moderate, sensible Democrat when he said on "Meet … Read More.

Obama Should Pardon Marines

Share Comment

President Barack Obama should pardon the four Marines who were captured on video as they urinated on three corpses, presumably dead Taliban.

After the video went viral last week, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared that the wisecracking troops may have committed war crimes. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta called Afghan President Hamid Karzai to assure him that the incident would be thoroughly investigated. Panetta told The Washington Post he wanted "an investigation into what happened here, what laws were violated by what took place, who these individuals were." Karzai in turn called for Washington to "apply the most severe punishment to anyone found guilty in this crime."

In short order, the Marine Corps and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service identified and questioned Marines serving with the 3rd Battalion, 2nd Marines infantry unit, based at Camp Lejeune, N.C., as part of a criminal investigation into the incident.

Because the federal government never does anything just once, there will be a second investigation. Obama says he wants to streamline government to make it smaller and smarter. Cutting the number of investigations per incident would be a great start.

Better yet, let the president pardon the Marines to spare them and their families the ordeal of an extended investigation, mounting legal bills and possibly prison time.

I do not defend what they did. As Army Lt. Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti informed NATO troops last week, "defiling, desecrating, mocking, photographing or filming for personal use" the bodies of dead insurgents is a "grave breach" of combat law that breaks "faith with the Afghan people, who trust us to uphold standards of law and decency, and to treat the living and the dead with dignity and respect."

Civilized societies don't have a taboo against defiling corpses simply out of an over-refined sense of delicacy.

If you want to bury your dead in peace, you have to treat enemy casualties with the respect you want for your own people.

Obama could use this episode as a teaching moment about the need for respect — not to mention discretion — in the era of the camera phone.

It also is a moment for Washington to consider that these Marines have made sacrifices in service to this country that noncombatants cannot begin to understand. These men have had to carry out the commander in chief's orders on the ground; that's a far more daunting duty than ordering a drone attack that kills the enemy and civilians remotely.

As Sebastian Junger wrote in The Washington Post, American troops "are very clear about the fact that society trains them to kill, orders them to kill and then balks at anything that suggests they have dehumanized the enemy they have killed."

Political science professor P.S. Ruckman, whose "Pardon Power" blog is the source for information on the presidential pardon, confirms that Obama has the authority to pardon the Marines today.

Washington politicians and bureaucrats are great at making other people pay for their mistakes. Want change? How about answering an act of thoughtless inhumanity with an act of unusual mercy?

Email Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
That sends a good message to the war-weary American people, but it wouldn't play well overseas. It might be better to have a full trial and the standard public shaming before quietly commuting the sentence (perhaps to house arrest).

It wouldn't do for the Taliban and the Chavez cheerleading squad to be able to accuse the US of having double standards. Letting them go scot-free would do precisely that. With a competent spin campaign, a soft sentence wouldn't have nearly the same propaganda punch as no sentence at all.

Sadly, their fate seems to have become a diplomatic chesspiece. Now all we can do is ensure that the greater good of the nation accords with basic mercy.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Byron Bojangles III
Thu Jan 19, 2012 1:18 PM
He won't do it. No way. He's a politician.

How can he possibly find a way to say this: "You can't criticize a bunch of kids you've trained to kill the enemy (Kill, get it? As in, he's dead, Jim) for pissing all over the target of those they've been trained to hate."

You see, killing is A OK, but pissing is absolutely verboten.

This is war, folks. We don't have a draft now. So only the unlucky few who think they will find their fortune in giving into the pushy sales pitch get to find out what war really means. And they are expected to behave as pristine professionals in all circumstances as if they were providing sales support to corporate clients of Cisco?

Those kids will be sacrificed to the Greater Good.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Masako
Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:22 PM
You have to seriously be kidding right? I will keep this short and succinct, What if your kid was killed over in Iraq or Afghanistan, and was killed in action? How do you think that you would feel to see on Headline News or Fox News, how the "enemy" was dragging your son's dead body through the streets and then pissing on it? Pardon these soldiers, seriously? They should get their due process and suffer the consequences of their disgusting deeds. Have we, as a nation, become so passified as to say, "Oh, boys will be boys after all?" We should just slap their hands and tell them, bad, bad, soldier.
Comment: #3
Posted by: D.B Darrell
Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:48 PM
Re: D.B Darrell well, I obviously didn't edit before I posted. It should read, What if your kid was serving over in Iraq or Afghanistan......
Comment: #4
Posted by: D.B Darrell
Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:51 PM
We can't judge these marines actions unless we've actually been to war and experienced the things they have. They should be pardoned but won't be. This kind of behavior on the battlefield is as old as war itself. If the American people don't like what they see here, they should speak up about all these wars we've been fighting.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Thu Jan 26, 2012 11:29 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

22 Feb 2007 Democrats' dilemma on Iraq

16 Aug 2007 The Man Behind the Haircut

13 Mar 2011 National Public Racket