creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
19 Feb 2012
Occupy Oakland, Violence Optional

Occupy Oakland activists have filed a lawsuit against the city and are seeking damages. The American Civil … Read More.

16 Feb 2012
President Obama Punts on US Deficit

In February 2009 — having signed into law his $787 billion stimulus package — President Barack … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
Obama Imposes Will in Contraception Compromise

From San Francisco, where I live, the controversy over the White House decision to require church-affiliated … Read More.

Meg Whitman Can Run a Company, but Can She Govern?

Share Comment

It took me five months to get my first interview with former eBay CEO and California GOP gubernatorial hopeful Meg Whitman, and when I did, it was after a press event where the news reporters were not allowed to ask questions. Swell.

Her supersize campaign has been rolling her out like an Easter egg. She has been in a shell — for which she has paid handsomely. She has contributed nearly $40 million to her campaign, yet she told me she and her husband, Griff Harsh IV, fly coach, "because it's cheaper."

The big question is: Can she govern? She has a background that might help. Her book, "The Power of Many," co-written with Joan O'C. Hamilton, presents a methodical troubleshooter whose first job as a newly minted Harvard MBA was to figure out how big the hole should be on a shampoo bottle. She trained to become the kind of management consultant "who can go into virtually any kind of business, analyze the situation and come up with an effective plan to solve problems and achieve goals." When working with a food-service company, her team studied the "physical movements of cooks and waitstaff" and came up with "a method to save hours of food preparation time by washing potatoes in dishwashers."

It's this creative yet methodical approach that is lacking in the administration of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, for whom budgeting has been a matter more of art — well, of special effects — than of science.

But can a former CEO who once cut costs by fiat learn how to cut deals with a big-spending liberal Legislature? Whitman and Harsh plan to move to Sacramento, buy a house and put down roots. She wants get to know all the lawmakers by name. Could she name some lawmakers with whom she could work? State Sen.

Tony Strickland, R-Thousand Oaks, and Assemblyman Nathan Fletcher, R-San Diego. But she believes she can help Democrats by making them "heroes" if they work with her to keep employers from leaving California.

Whitman acknowledged that she recently told KNBC that she would "veto virtually" all bills that do not advance her three priorities of creating jobs, slashing government and reforming public schools.

Whitman believes the key to balancing the budget is boosting the economy, but she also wants to pare state government by some 40,000 employees — by the most popular method of all, attrition.

Have you ever negotiated with unions? Whitman answered, "I have not directly negotiated with unions; we had union members when I worked at Hasbro."

There were no eBay unions. What is more, Whitman never has gone toe to toe with the public employee unions who have blocked Schwarzenegger's reforms in the past.

This is where Whitman's "right person, right job, right time" management mantra comes in. When I asked about the public furor likely to follow if she were perceived as a veto-happy obstructionist governor, Whitman replied, "Or not. I actually think the public might be thrilled to death."

"If your ratings go down, it's OK," she said. And: "You will never be popular in a turnaround." Yet her model of an executive-turned-politician is New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg — and he is popular. And in her mind, California needs a turnaround. After she had been at eBay a few years, Whitman said, the executive staff began to wonder: If we had to start eBay all over again, would we do it in California?

Which state would you pick? I asked. She answered, "Probably Texas."

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
It may be difficult to know whether or not Whitman would be an effective governor, or even whether she can beat Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown in the general contest this November. The frustrating part is that both questions are essentially moot for fiscally and socially conservative voters here in California. Why? Because there's no viable alternative candidate for us to support. Poizner, the only other serious candidate, is getting his clock cleaned in the primary polling data, and we can't seem to get any honest rock-ribbed conservatives like Tom McClintock anywhere near the governor's chair. (He ran during the 2002 recall and was so far behind Ahnold, he was in another time zone.)
Comment: #1
Posted by: Matt
Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:10 AM
I don't like the negative ads Whitman is running about Poizner. Let her state her qualifications to be governor and omit attempts to make Poizer appear unsuitable to even be dog catcher.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Pat Riley
Thu Mar 11, 2010 8:43 AM
I would like to know if your question is can she govern, or can she be any worse than what we already have in our state or Federal governament? Neither the President or the Governor have any idea what fiscal responsibiliy means obviously they have never run any businesses. The most important issue for the new govenor of California will be the issue of state employees. Negotiations with the unions who have help destroy California and seem to be unwilling to make the difficult choices too save this state from bankruptcy or federal bailout must be approached from a much tougher perspective. Threaten bankruptcy and mean it. It state bankrupts there will be no union contracts and they will have too start over. It will not cause total anarchy safety positions can be paid and these people will not leave the state. If the union are unwilling to accept cuts there will be very little options available. If you accept bailouts from the federal government it will mean the end of any state sovereignty.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Dennis Yoken
Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:12 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 19 Feb 2012

22 Jul 2007 Free the Border Patrol Two

2 May 2007 Bad Medicine on Lethal Injection

25 Jan 2007 DEBRA J. SAUNDERS