creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
16 Feb 2012
President Obama Punts on US Deficit

In February 2009 — having signed into law his $787 billion stimulus package — President Barack … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
Obama Imposes Will in Contraception Compromise

From San Francisco, where I live, the controversy over the White House decision to require church-affiliated … Read More.

12 Feb 2012
To Make Women Safe, We Treat Them Like Children

The domestic-violence case against San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi did not start with a call from wife … Read More.

McCain Sticks to His Guns

Share Comment

In an age of craven politics, John McCain is not afraid to swim against the tide. When Americans soured on the Iraq War and had begun telling pollsters they wanted out, McCain pushed for a surge of U.S. troops in Iraq. Today, casualties are down dramatically and Iraqi troops are defending Iraqis. Now the outcome of this war need not be that more than 4,100 American troops fell for a failed effort, which only confirmed Osama bin Laden's belief that America, when faced with losses, would cut and run.

In a political primary that had most Republicans playing to the GOP base, McCain pushed for an immigration reform bill that infuriated those primary voters. The experts said it would kill his nomination. He pushed for a second vote. Only when that second try failed did McCain then acknowledge that the federal government has to do more to curb illegal immigration before extending the path to citizenship to those illegally in America today.

I disagreed with McCain on the amnesty aspects of his bill, but I had to respect that he was determined to honor the drive of those who, if not particularly concerned about obeying the laws of their new country, worked hard to claim a stake in this melting-pot nation.

McCain's image as a Republican maverick is attractive. That's why Barack Obama has spent millions of dollars tarnishing it. On big issues, McCain has bucked the GOP establishment. He opposed the pork-laden farm and energy bills supported by President Bush (and Obama). Ditto Dubya's under-funded Medicare prescription-drug program. That's because McCain has been the too-rare-in-Washington Republican who saw it as his job, not just to pay lip service to stopping unnecessary spending, but to stop it.

I know that if he is elected, McCain will drive me nuts. For one thing, he'll do a better job of working with Democrats than Republicans because he believes in compromise. He can be weak on policy issues.

When he talks energy or climate change, he talks on the surface, not in detail.

Many fault his campaign for operating on an ad hoc basis, but that's what happens when you have more talent than money.

The Palin pick? It energized a group of voters who have felt marginalized — and McCain has to win before he can govern.

Is McCain "erratic"? So Team Obama argued after McCain suspended his campaign and went to Washington to push for the $700 billion Bush bailout measure. The McCampaign suspension failed to deliver enough GOP votes to pass a bill in the first House vote, so you cannot call it particularly successful.

And McCain's failure to return to Washington after the first presidential debate lacked follow through. In the end, the whole episode smacked of opportunism — not befitting a senator who had put country first on immigration and Iraq.

And I, for one, want a president who looks to Iraq and recognizes his obligation to settle matters so that U.S. troops need not return there in our lifetime.

The next president will inherit federal spending on overdrive. The next president will have to work to balance, not only the federal budget, but also Social Security and Medicare accounts. Will he keep proposing more unfunded spending to spread the goodies around, or will he take on the difficult tasks needed to bring fiscal discipline to a hung-over Washington?

I have never seen Obama tell people they will have to pay more to fund his many new programs. First he trashes Bush for deficit spending and an "era of easy money," then he promises Americans more government programs and more tax cuts.

Now I think McCain is over-promising on tax cuts, too. But I have seen McCain brave the polls on Iraq, the Republican base on immigration and the GOP establishment on spending. He has shown himself to be willing to do the unpopular in order to accomplish the necessary. I don't always agree with him, but I always have to respect him.

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Ma'am; ...If you please, try to understand that even if we found a commanding interest in going to Iraq; we did not have to stay... If an army is not mobile, it is not an army, but a target. We could have went back...More than this, if we want to go to war, it should be with the consent and support of all the people... War is one of those things likely to affact the entire future of the whole people... The people -should have a say...Let the genius of the people stand to the front... Let the people be guided by their better angels... Let them suggest alternatives to war... We can always fall out, but we should never begin a conflict without unity. Certainly the war in Iraq was a mistake... It will prove a failure like Afghanistan because Islam is indomitable... If you do not understand their history, and have not read the Holy Qu'uran, and do not realize what they have sufffered, and what they have overcome, you should not go to war with them... Know your enemy is the first commandment of war... The enemy is among us, picking fights we don't need half way around the world... And they will not pay for the fun...Taxes are for little people..Taxes and war are for the little people to bear, but without consent...Right....Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:09 AM
Yep, McCain sticks to his guns. Reminds me of Yosemite Sam. The problem with all this blather about getting out of Iraq with a so-called victory is the lack of acknowledgment that we shouldn't have been there in the first place. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

There is a reason for that lack of acknowledgment. It is because conscience-free vultures like you, who just don't give a hoot how many lives we screwed up in Iraq, think it was perfectly fine to go there on whatever phony pretense could be sold to the herd. ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

That is the unspoken reason for the difference between Obama's focus on how we got there and avoiding raping some other country next time versus McCain's focus on picking as much off the bones as we can before we leave the carcass. But, no need to worry about all of that. Iraq will become a satellite of Iran before you know it. The middle east will be left with yet another theocracy, and historians will note that the U.S. vendetta against a single brutal leader (guess how may of them we have 'round the world) was such a priority for those two idiots in the White House that they were willing to destroy the lives of millions of Iraqis along with the balance of power between Iraq and Iran in order to watch a good hanging.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Masako
Tue Oct 21, 2008 4:04 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

31 Mar 2009 Obama: Just Say No

20 Jul 2010 Love for Labor Lost

20 Feb 2011 Human Nature and D.C.-backed Loans