creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
14 Feb 2012
Obama Imposes Will in Contraception Compromise

From San Francisco, where I live, the controversy over the White House decision to require church-affiliated … Read More.

12 Feb 2012
To Make Women Safe, We Treat Them Like Children

The domestic-violence case against San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi did not start with a call from wife … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Shaky Grounds for Prop. 8 Ruling

Two of three judges on a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel on Tuesday found Proposition 8 unconstitutional.… Read More.

In with the New

Share Comment

In the end, American voters serve as the great equalizer. When one party goes too far, voters snap the leash, as they did on Tuesday.

I still maintain that John McCain was the better presidential candidate, but I can't blame swing voters for rejecting a party that had lost touch with the hopes and dreams of ordinary Americans, and instead deciding to take a chance on the forward-looking Barack Obama. Thus history is made.

And the stale GOP leadership deserves to be history. Take Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, who was convicted on seven felony violations of federal ethics laws in a trial that paraded before the world a man utterly corrupted by power, and — worse — so arrogant that he believed he could convince a jury that a $2,700 Brookstone massage chair that sat in his home for seven years was a loan, and that he was clueless that $250,000 in home improvements were done on someone else's dime.

Then there's Sen. Larry Craig, R-Men's Room, who reneged on his pledge to resign from office after he pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct in a bathroom stall. The Republican Party suffers from a true cancer of careerism when disgraced lawmakers cling to their seats, uncaring as to how they stain their institutions.

Too many GOP leaders think it's all about them, not the country they serve. Take House GOP leader John Boehner, who claimed that a highly partisan speech delivered by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi before the first failed vote for a $700 billion bailout caused some GOP members, who would have voted for the bill, "to go south."

Yes, Pelosi screwed up, too. And I blame both parties for that vote. But I also know which party had the most to lose — and which nominee never recovered in the polls after the first bailout vote failed. At a time when Republicans should have been fighting against excessive spending, they turned into enablers of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's move to lard the bailout measure with an extra $110 billion in goodies.

The sad part is, McCain was different, better than the rest.

He has fought earmark spending throughout his Senate career. He opposed the Bush prescription-drug plan, the pork-heavy farm bill and the special-interest-bonanza energy bill. In the end, however, voters came to associate McCain with the worst of the GOP.

And McCain helped. When McCampaign honed in on Obama's association with Bill Ayers, an education professor who helped found the terrorist Weather Underground in the 1960s, the gambit backfired with swing voters because McCain seemed stuck in a bygone era.

I have to think that some folks simply have had enough of the sound-bite wars of the Bush years. And fair or not, GOP running mate Sarah Palin's presence virtually guaranteed more rancor and finger-pointing over nonessential issues.

Many hardcore Republicans will blame the loss on McCain's wobbly approach to illegal immigration and global warming. But McCain also lost in choosing to follow the Bush 2004 path to victory — that is, to work to turn out the GOP base, instead of reaching out to the middle. And while Palin may have a promising political career ahead of her, she was needlessly provocative when she talked about rural states as the "real America."

Let me add, there are a lot of moderate Republicans who would like to see the party move to the middle on abortion and other social issues. They were voters McCain could not afford to lose.

The Democratic Congress hasn't exactly reformed Washington spending since taking power in 2006. It's not just the bailout bill; members also have kept adding zeroes to their Son of Stimulus package proposals and even heaped pork onto Iraq war funding bills.

In 2006, GOP Rep. Mark Foley of Florida resigned after ABC News reported that he had sent lewd e-mails to male House pages. The family-values Democrat who picked up his seat already is drowning in scandal, including charges that he put a lover on the federal payroll.

To judge by the last two years, the Democrats may, in four years, hit the lows to which it took Republicans more than a decade to fall. They've won the right to try.

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Ma'am; .. The republican voters I know, are, for the most part, moral, and they vote for the republican party candidates primarily on moral issues... For the party; economy and protection of wealth is the larger concern, but they know the common morality is the deciding issue for the base... The party has the morality of words... The people have the morality of deeds... And it is a shame... I am an honest to God moralist... I don't just accept the me good you bad morality that expects the flag and neighbors in heaven; but looks to the underlying morality that does not come out of a church, and yet keeps the faith. I think, if the skin deep morality of the republican voters were examined, it would be shown to be 90% common sense, and ten percent mean spirit... If they just took the common sense part of their morality, to the fair they would find it is just like the common sense morality of the liberals... No morality works when communities are destroyed... It is not morality which supports communities, but communities that ARE morality... No one belongs to a community in fact until they accept the community morality... So let me ask... What is our morality??? What is our universal American morality so we can decide what we will accept??? I mean, it is one thing to learn the morality of your church and your community, but another thing to think without discussion or question that your morality should be accepted...There never was a community without a common morality; but our economy is not moral, and our environmental and foreign policy is not moral, so anyone expecting me to accept a whole rash of un thought out morality has a screw loose... People follow people... If you believe some one is a moral leader, follow them to a more perfect morality... That does not mean you are relieved of the need for making the moral argument to others because morality is accepted, and is not imposed... Coersion in the cause of morality is immoral... And there is nothing in liberal morality preventing anyone from living a moral life...But that is the mean spirit of the moral right... They are blind to the immorality of their party, and they think they may make republicanism moral with their morality, and they do not... They do not see all the immorality behind the republican party... That makes them blind; but it does not make them moral... And their blindness and uncritical acceptance of republican morality does not endear them to their fellow Americans, and instead, cuts them off from any opportunity to make their point...So the problem as I see it is this... Law and economic forces work to destroy small communities, even down to the level of the family, and we have no universal morality we can all find acceptible to replace the small community morality we leave behind... The individual, which is the same as an outlaw in days past is cut loose from moral anchors... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Nov 6, 2008 10:37 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Alan Reynolds
Alan ReynoldsUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Terence Jeffrey
Terence JeffreyUpdated 15 Feb 2012

31 Oct 2010 Loose Change and Propositions

20 Feb 2011 Human Nature and D.C.-backed Loans

17 Nov 2011 Newt and Nancy Together Again