Opinion> Debra Saunders> Headcount Follies

	14 Feb 2012 Obama Imposes Will in Contraception Compromise From San Francisco, where I live, the controversy over the White House decision to require church-affiliated … Read More.
	12 Feb 2012 To Make Women Safe, We Treat Them Like Children The domestic-violence case against San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi did not start with a call from wife … Read More.
	8 Feb 2012 Shaky Grounds for Prop. 8 Ruling Two of three judges on a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel on Tuesday found Proposition 8 unconstitutional.… Read More.

Headcount Follies

If you see the federal government as a benign force that seeks only to make your life better, then the questions in the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey may not bother you. But if you have a smidgen of doubt, or if you value your privacy, you probably aren't going to like some of Uncle Sam's invasive queries.

Like: What is your race? Your personal ancestry or ethnic origin? How many rooms are in your home? Is anyone at home deaf or hard of hearing? Does anyone at home "because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition" have "serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions?"

Trouble walking or climbing stairs? Difficulty dressing or bathing? Or, "because of a physical, mental or emotional condition," does anyone at your home have difficulty "doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor's office or shopping?"

All I could think of as I read the questionnaire — which is sent to some 250,000 addresses each month to keep census data current — was: Wait until talk radio gets a hold of this baby. These questions punch practically every hot button in the paranoid person's arsenal (although the survey did not ask how often respondents have sex — which shows the Viagra lobby has its limits).

Listeners unhappy with President Obama's expansion of federal power cannot be expected to savor opening the mail to find a questionnaire peppered with highly personal questions — and by the way, the U.S. Census Bureau says it is a federal crime not to respond. If you don't answer, Uncle Sam can fine you up to $5,000. It's as if the government is telling you: Trust us with your personal information. Or else.

They even tell you that you can't put slashes, European style, through your 7s. There is some good news. "I'd come visit you in jail," Chapman University law professor and GOP gubernatorial candidate Tom Campbell quipped when I called to ask him about the constitutional issues. "Courageous columnist goes to jail rather than have privacy invaded."

Courageous? Not so fast, professor.

As it turns out, this survey is not proof of Obama Overreach. The 2000 census asked essentially the same questions — on race, ancestry, even the physical, mental or emotional conditions.

Census Bureau public information officer Shelly Lowe wants you to know that while you may be reluctant to share personal information with a faceless form, the bureau has strict rules safeguarding individual privacy. Lowe called the bureau "the Fort Knox of data." Any employee who for some reason broke the confidentiality rules could face jail time.

The purpose of the census is to aggregate data so Washington can figure out where to distribute your dollars, not to peek in your underwear drawer.

As for the "mandatory" answers and possible fine of up to $5,000 — to Lowe's knowledge, no American ever has been fined, even though only 67 percent of Americans participated in the 2000 census. "We do not want to be in the enforcement business," she told me.

That's good to know because a lot of Americans don't want to answer, for example, the race question. Campbell opined, "On the merits of it, I think we should have a colorblind society. I think asking people their race is repulsive."

Then there's the libertarian argument, voiced by Hoover Institution legal solon Richard Epstein: "If you're a minimal-state (government) person, you don't want the government to have money to run a set of programs that it should not run at all."

The Constitution — Article 1, Sect. 2 — mandates an every-10-years census, but the language calls for an "enumeration" for drawing congressional districts — not a Facebook page. Yet even the first census taken in 1790 did not simply count heads; it differentiated between male and female, free and slave.

Some respondents list their race as "American" — a statement in itself. There's an argument to be made that choosing not to answer keeps you out of the head count. Then you only hurt yourself and undercut your representation in Congress.

Alas, the Census Bureau does not help itself by making the long form so complicated. It's supposed to be a headcount, not a headache.

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment

Ma'am;... So, what is your problem with the questions you offer as examples??? Do you not want the government to realize that people are over burdened with their old, just as they are over burdened with their young??? Working people, people forced by economic pressure and the downward direction of wages to work have no extra energy for children or parents, and yet, there they are, demanding.... My Mother in law is losing it. She cannot control her sugar, and she is going to lose her house, and she cannot get around, and she cannot defend herself from preditors who call her on the phone, and try to sell her garbage she does not need...Should my wife lose her job keeping her mother going??? We support the notion of the individual that cuts all people too loose from their communities and community support...Children chaff at nearly nonexistent control because there is no authority behind it, and no real defense of them... And old people find they have no families who love them, or who can support and guard them...The question asked by the federal government has the likelyhood of pointing out at what stage of decay this corpse of a society is in... We have let this people die trying to keep the ideology of capital working... The more millionaires we make the more desparately poor people we make... The more armies we build the less we have to defend... The more anti-depressants we take, the more depressing our reality becomes... The more high tech medicine we have, the less basic care when it is needed most, for the young, and for the old...What a beautiful world we have when we can see all that sparkles and afford none of it... God forbid that through the agency of our federal government that we might know our shared condition, and know we do not suffer alone, and seek together for a common solution... We are not animals, and should no let ourselves be reduced to the status of animals.... We should be able to care for our own, our old, and our young, and if we cannot because the boss is demanding all our time for a pittance, then the system is broke beyond repair... We should all have rights, because rights are what we pay for, and are organized for -in our governments and associations...If we should find ourselves living worse than the third world in our own land, it is not the fault of the government, or of the rich...It is our fault if we do not take our land back...I do not think the problem is one of communication only; but if the government asks the questions it can never say it does not know the answers, and so justify doing nothing...Government is where we talk, and where our problems are addressed... If there is no communication, it is certain no problems will be fixed, and that only specious problems given voice by journalists and commentators will reach the ears of government... Thanks

Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Jun 4, 2009 7:09 AM