creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
14 Feb 2012
Obama Imposes Will in Contraception Compromise

From San Francisco, where I live, the controversy over the White House decision to require church-affiliated … Read More.

12 Feb 2012
To Make Women Safe, We Treat Them Like Children

The domestic-violence case against San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi did not start with a call from wife … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Shaky Grounds for Prop. 8 Ruling

Two of three judges on a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel on Tuesday found Proposition 8 unconstitutional.… Read More.

Europe on the Cheap

Share Comment

American voters want — and President Obama campaigned on a platform of — European-style government at American tax rates.

Consider the Obama take on GM's and Chrysler's extended hand for another Washington bailout. Obama recognizes that the Detroit automakers are in trouble because of pension and retiree health care costs and quality issues, but his focus Monday was on the failure of GM and Chrysler to manufacture the "fuel-efficient cars and trucks that will carry us toward an energy-independent future." That's the happy conceit of Democrats who — their own personal driving habits and what you see on the nation's highways every day notwithstanding — have determined that Americans really prefer driving small, fuel-efficient cars in the style of Our Betters in Europe.

Now, with gasoline in the $2 per gallon range, Obama's brainstorm for a successful business model is to create "the next generation of clean cars." Get it: GM and Chrysler are in trouble because their cars weren't liberal enough.

It helps if you forget that the Big Three cranked out big cars for years because Americans bought them in the days before gasoline hit $4 per gallon.

Here's the European-government-with-American-taxes angle: If Obamaland believes it is in the interest of America's national security to drive fuel-efficient cars, the only sure route there is to levy higher gasoline taxes — as they do in Europe.

Look at France, where taxes account for about 70 percent of the price of gasoline, compared to less than 17 percent in the United States. Our Betters in Europe pay some $5 to $6.50 per gallon of gas — or 2.5 to three times more than Americans pay. That's why Europeans drive smaller cars. And that's why European carmakers design smaller cars.

Instead, Obama plans to push Americans into buying his promised "new generation of clean cars" with — you guessed it — lower taxes. This week, he supported "a generous credit to consumers who turn in old, less fuel-efficient cars and purchase cleaner cars." That's on top of an Obama stimulus provision that allows consumers to deduct sales and excise taxes for cars bought between Feb.

16 and the end of the year.

There's a logic deficit to the whole approach.

If the administration truly wants Americans to drive smaller cars, it needs to instill in automakers utter certainty that gasoline prices will rise and stay at very high rates. Short-term tax credits can't do that, as they leave carmakers unsure of what families will buy and afraid of losing the cushy-sized car market.

Raising the gasoline tax gradually but continuously is the only sure way to meet Obama's fuel-efficiency agenda. But Obama won't propose it because there is no way to hide the tax. Every time drivers fill their tanks, they'll see the price tag and know who put it there.

His entire 2008 campaign was based on telling voters they could get more government programs to promote health care, education and his environmental agenda — but 95 percent of families would not have to pay for it. When asked in a debate with rival John McCain what sacrifices he would ask Americans to make, Obama answered, "There is going to be the need for each and every one of us to start thinking about how we use energy." That's right, his sacrifice wasn't in the pocketbook — except for families earning more than $250,000 — his sacrifice was in asking voters to think.

Consider Obama's campaign pledge to deliver universal access to health care. Say this for the French, they pay for their services; they pay a value-added tax of up to 19.6 percent and a 40 percent tax rate for income above some $88,313. But at the 2008 convention, the Democratic platform asserted that under ObamaCare, the "typical American family" would save "up to $2,500 per year." European services, American taxes — with a bonus.

Who really pays? The future taxpayers of America saddled with rapidly accumulating debt.

There you have the real Obama model — Europe, but on lower U.S. tax rates. This combo makes for an unsustainable model. Like Chrysler.

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Ma'am;... Certainly we should tax gasoline more; but is that fair??? This people are the most powerless and miserable population on earth, and not because they do not have much; but because the price of getting that good is a target running downrange... Do we really need our jobs jumping all over the countryside??? Do we need to be whipsawed to death, with states competing with each other for factories until, to have a job, all workers are reduced to slavery???A federal system would work better for the workers...A national plan would work better for the country... How can the Germans keep their country the country and their cities as cities while we sprawl and sprawl until the outskirts of one city meet the outskirts of another??? There are small factories all the way from Lansing to Detroit, and no one can say where Detroit leaves off and Ann Arbor begins... Factories seek to escape old expensive infastructure, and the taxes are so cheap on their abandoned realestate, that they can simply walk, and find new workers, and new realestate... The thousands of miles of good farmland destroyed by this mindless progress is not a point of pride; but a mark of shame.... And People have to jump in their cars for work, usually one to a car, travelling hours a day... Of course they should pay for such behavior; if there were an alternative...There is no public transit system... That too is a mark of shame... And no one except the crazy or the drunk talk on the bus around here... All think of it as an indignity to have to share space with the poorest, and that is how public transit is percieved: the last chance to get there if the goal is not too distant...So what if I own an SUV???.There is no doubt that it is useful....And it costs... So it usually sits... But pack four or five people in it, and the fuel per person per mile gets down right reasonable...It is one thing for Europeans to run around in match box cars... Where do they have to go??? I have been twice in my life beyond the Mississippi...Does anyone think it would have been possible to get my family to go in a clown car??? We have families, and we like to go together, and for those people who out of common sense put their cities in one place and their scenery in another, who can go by train, having an expensive car that will not hold more than two is a smart decision... If you want people to drive small cars, give them a break... I have a car/truck that I don't drive one part of one percent of the time, that I must insure 100% of the time... Does that make sense???Does it make sense to have grocery stores miles away from auto parts stores that are miles away from hardware stores??? You want the average citizens to pay for the fact that their society is an anarchy... Believe me... We pay.... We pay with every hour out of our days stuck in traffic...We pay with every extra gallon of gasoline that we turn into pollution...We pay with every second of our limited lives that we spend at traffic lights... What is the point of government that does not manage national affairs to the best interest of all the people??? Sure; it has bent over making things easy for the owners, for the rich, for the businessmen... Has there been any trickle down benefit to America spending its life on the road to make a buck that goes in large part to buying time on the road to make a buck???It is crazy...It is anarchy...It is capitalism... And when it comes to paying for the cost of this mess; should it not be the rich who pay???Is there some reason a person with an income of a hundred million cannot live on ten million??? Would progress be stiffled??? Would capitalism come to an end???We have let so many jackassess in power cut their own deal in life, and if we had some democracy we could expect some common sense to it all... And we pay... Common sense must be more expensive than gold because it is more rare....And what we pay for the want of it is driving us to ruin... Thanks....Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Apr 2, 2009 5:46 AM
Another dummer than dirt first. The price of gasoline will go right back up again, in spades. No taxes necessary. We're just in the eye of the storm right now.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Masako
Sat Apr 4, 2009 8:59 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Terence Jeffrey
Terence JeffreyUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Alan Reynolds
Alan ReynoldsUpdated 15 Feb 2012

5 Mar 2009 Plan Obama: Pass the Check

2 Aug 2011 House Raises the Ceiling

14 Aug 2011 Castro Valley Boulevard Redevelops, but to What?