Opinion> Debra Saunders> Drug Laws Absence Of Justice

	14 Feb 2012 Obama Imposes Will in Contraception Compromise From San Francisco, where I live, the controversy over the White House decision to require church-affiliated … Read More.
	12 Feb 2012 To Make Women Safe, We Treat Them Like Children The domestic-violence case against San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi did not start with a call from wife … Read More.
	8 Feb 2012 Shaky Grounds for Prop. 8 Ruling Two of three judges on a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel on Tuesday found Proposition 8 unconstitutional.… Read More.

Drug Laws' Absence of Justice

When Attorney General Michael Mukasey was working to persuade Congress to stop a U.S. Sentencing Commission decision to allow federal judges to reduce the sentences of some 19,500 federal inmates serving time for crack cocaine offenses, he told the Fraternal Order of Police that federal crack offenders "are some of the most serious and violent offenders in the federal system."

Drug lords, rejoice. If your average crack offender represents the most dangerous convicts in the federal system, then a lot of small-time hoods and mid-level lackeys who don't pack heat are warming prison beds that should be meant for kingpins and their armed henchmen.

You've probably read about the disparity in federal mandatory minimum sentences before. The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 mandated a five-year minimum sentence for possession of 5 grams of crack cocaine or 500 grams of powdered cocaine. Civil rights groups have attacked the 100-1 volume disparity on racial grounds. The U.S. Sentencing Commission found that more than 80 percent of crack offenders are black, while some 80 percent of powdered cocaine offenders are white.

Over the years, the sentencing commission has recommended narrowing the crack-powder gap. In May, the commission also called for a repeal of mandatory minimum sentences for simple possession of cocaine in either form, in the belief that federal law enforcement should concentrate on big-volume dealers. Congress has failed to act.

Last year, the sentencing commission made a modest reduction in crack sentences and also allowed inmates to petition for reduced sentences starting March 3. Since Congress did not stop the change, more than 1,500 inmates are eligible to apply this year. The average sentence reduction, according to the commission, is expected to be 27 months.

If this rules change meant that violent career criminals would be running wild and free, I'd be leading the charge in protest. It's true, federal statistics show that 27 percent of powder and 43 percent of crack offenses in 2005 were broadly defined as involving weapons — but that definition can apply to "any participant" of a deal in which someone else has a knife or a gun.

When the commission looked for crimes that involved injury, death, or threats of injury or death, it found that 90 percent of crack offenses "did not have violence associated with them." So if these are the most violent offenders, as Mukasey says, the feds are going after sissies.

What is more, the commission found in 2002 that that largest portion of crack offenders — 55 percent — were street-level dealers, while the largest group of powder cocaine offenders — 33 percent — were couriers and mules. I'm not saying they shouldn't go to prison, but that the feds should focus on putting dangerous criminals behind bars, not these losers.

Eric Sterling, who as a congressional staffer helped write the draconian 1986 drug-abuse law and later started the Criminal Justice Policy Foundation as penance, noted that the downside to critics focusing on the crack-powder disparity as a "civil rights complaint" is that they neglect the larger problem — cocaine prosecutions too often target small-time criminals when "the feds should be going after high-level people, the multi-kilo multi-ton traffickers" — the thugs who have private armies, launder barrels of money and generally endanger all of society.

As a former federal judge, Mukasey should have more faith in his erstwhile brethren. As Sterling noted, "Judges aren't going to just let dangerous people out" — not when they can turn down petitions filed by the rare drug lord who comes before their bench.

"What passes for a drug kingpin in 99 percent of the cases is nothing more than a young man who can't even afford a lawyer when he's hauled into court," a frustrated U.S. District Court Judge Patrick Murphy of East St. Louis told "60 Minutes" in 2004. "I've seen very few drug kings."

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment

Hello Ms. Saunders from James in North Port Fl, I worked in the NYS Prison System as a Correction Officer. I have seen the devastation that drugs do to human beings and their loved ones. The laws on the books are used to keep these addicts off of the streets. They are an expensive nuisance both out of prison and in prison. At least that's how the local and state governments see these people. The expense is about catching them and incarcerating. A friend of mine who is in law enforcement once asked an FBI agent why we don't stop the kingpins of drugs. The answer, the war on crime is quite lucrative both legally and illegally. Legally the state,local and federal government hires law enforcement officers to enforce the laws pertaining to dealing with the criminal. That guy or gal selling on the street corner to little kids. Or little kids selling to little kids. Illegally the money from the sale of drugs is billions of dollars a year in the "underground economy." Seems like that money "could" be spent in hiring lawyers,soldiers, politicians by the kingpin. I think I know why the President refused to build a fence along Mexico's border and enforce our border laws. A lot of drugs come pouring into our country via Mexico. Don't forget Afghanistan where the poppies are grown by the local tribes and our US troops do not go near these crops. How about China and Asia where much of the illegal drug products come from. Americans have a huge appetite for illegal drugs. It's being supplied by anyone who wants to make a dollar. I learned much about these issues speaking to inmates and listening to them. Many of these young people incarcerated in the black community were called "ham snatchers." Petty thieves. I met one kingpin in my 25 years out of the thousands I came in contact with. Those big drug busts you read about are usually a small sacrifice so that a large shipement or shipments enter this country.

Comment: #1
Posted by: James Borman
Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:42 AM