creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
16 Feb 2012
President Obama Punts on US Deficit

In February 2009 — having signed into law his $787 billion stimulus package — President Barack … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
Obama Imposes Will in Contraception Compromise

From San Francisco, where I live, the controversy over the White House decision to require church-affiliated … Read More.

12 Feb 2012
To Make Women Safe, We Treat Them Like Children

The domestic-violence case against San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi did not start with a call from wife … Read More.

The Dipstick Tipping Point

Share Comment

"We can't drill our way out of the problem." Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has said it. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has said it. It's one of those bromides sincerely repeated by Democrats with such conviction that for years left-leaning audiences duly nodded their heads, never questioning whether the truism was indeed true. Until gasoline leaped above the $4-a-gallon mark.

Now some polls show that Americans support more domestic drilling. President Bush seized the moment Wednesday when he asked Congress to lift its ban on offshore drilling.

Even Republican presidential candidate John McCain has seen the light. A longtime opponent of drilling off the coasts of California and Florida, as well as in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, McCain has come out in favor of lifting the oil-exploration ban off the coasts.

Economic adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin told the New York Times that McCain had supported the drilling moratorium until 2006, when Washington and Gulf Coast states reached a compromise that permitted some offshore oil-and-gas exploration.

I don't care how McTeam tries to package it, McCain has flip-flopped on offshore drilling — and it's about time.

For too long, McCain talked like a Democrat. He was in favor of greater energy independence, of reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and of no new drilling off the coasts or in ANWR — and cheap gasoline. To believe all that is possible in this global market, you essentially have to believe in a good energy fairy.

When gas prices exceeded $4 per gallon, McCain, like many taxpayers, hit the tipping point where he could no longer afford the romanticized view that oil should only be pumped from yucky places. So he began to talk about Washington offering financial incentives to get coastal states to agree to new offshore exploration.

Why does McCain believe in states' rights for Californians and Floridians, but not Alaskans, who support drilling in ANWR? I asked Holtz-Eakin.

His answer: Some places are simply too "special."

Wednesday, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger released a statement that reaffirmed, "I do not support lifting this moratorium on new oil drilling off our coast." Be it noted that Schwarzenegger agreed to increasing Indian gaming, and now wants to pump up the lottery to raise needed money for state coffers — but he won't dirty his hands with offshore oil. Gambling is one thing, but producing more of a commodity used by all is beyond the pale.

Barack Obama is stuck with the Democrats' energy policy — which is denial of reality. Global demand for energy is up. It's not going to go down in the next 10 years. What more do you need to know?

Yet the Democrats continue to talk as if we cannot touch our own oil reserves, and still not pay higher prices at the pump.

Obama told reporters that offshore drilling wouldn't bring relief to consumers for five years — other Democrats say 10 years — at the soonest. He also touts the $150 billion he wants to spend over 10 years on the "green energy sector" — that money won't provide instant results, either.

Rayola Dougher, an economic analyst for the American Petroleum Institute, estimated that there are 1 million to 2 million barrels of oil per day that could be drilled in now-restricted coastal areas — "that's 10-20 percent of what we're importing." That oil could be on the market in as soon as five years.

Back in 1995, when President Clinton vetoed legislation to permit drilling in ANWR, environmentalists argued that it would do no good for Washington to permit drilling in the Alaskan refuge because Americans wouldn't see any oil for 10 years. Who doesn't want that oil now?

"Now that their opposition has helped drive gas prices to record levels," Bush said of the Democrats Wednesday, "I ask them to reconsider their positions." Americans may have been willing to live in oil la-la land and oppose new drilling offshore or in Alaska when they thought a moratorium wouldn't cost them. Now they know better.

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
This Obama character says the dumbest things all the time. He continues to make specious, nebulous promises and has baggage, the surface(s) of which have just begun to be scratched. If his Party had not fought drilling for years we would not be in the situation we are now regarding gas prices. I hope he and his mouthy wife will soon be discredited because Obama is dangerous to the safety of this Country with his ideas of appeasing terrorists ... negotiation involves appeasement(s) and we should never "talk" with terrorists. Besides he also seems to have personal, emotional and spiritual ties to terrorist countries, and that should call for a thorough FBI Investigation.
Comment: #1
Posted by: USMCMOE
Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:28 AM
Dear Debby,
Off-shore drilling will, of course, eventually occur and it will (1) not lower gas prices and (2) will not free the US from dependence on foreign oil supplies. Here's why: It is probable that about half the earth's oil has been discovered and is already being (or been) extracted for the simple reason that the biggest, most shallow oil reserves were the easiest to find. Future reserves will be deeper, and smaller, and more costly to extract. Costly both in technological and environmental terms. In the second place, demand for oil is increasing in Asia, so every barrel that US consumers save will be sold to China and India. These countries will burn that oil, pumping millions of more tons of CO2 into the atmosphere, accelerating global climate change, and creating more devastation. The US will continue to require much more than it can possibly produce because the country lacks the transportation infrastructure to move goods across the continent in the most efficient way. That infrastructure was short-changed for decades in favor of roads and cars and trucks. An additional critical factor is world population, which will continue to grow and will outstrip demand as poor countries try in vain to sustain agricultural output. In the meantime, conservatives who don't understand conservation will continue to bray and bloviate (as in your case). I assume you aren't really interested in the math, or you wouldn't be writing this twaddle in the first place, but the numbers are there, and they don't add up in your favor.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Robert Conner
Fri Jun 20, 2008 3:57 PM
Ms. Saunders, you really ought to write less and think more. Your mindless production of ill-considered words offers quite a parallel to what is going on with oil. The stuff is killing us. And so is the me-first, do-it-now chatter too many phonies like you are pawning off as journalism. Have a look at Tom Friedman's "Addict in Chief" column today in the NY Times and take a lesson in the real thing. And conscience too, while you're at it. The problem with babbling boobies like you is that you are just going to grow old and die, and the generations that follow aren't going to be able to damn you to your face for bequeathing them a planet that's like a bird cage filled with crap.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Masako
Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:46 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

5 May 2011 Insecure Communities

15 Feb 2007 Who makes the tough decisions?

28 Jun 2007 Good Ol' Boys Empty GOP