creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
14 Feb 2012
Obama Imposes Will in Contraception Compromise

From San Francisco, where I live, the controversy over the White House decision to require church-affiliated … Read More.

12 Feb 2012
To Make Women Safe, We Treat Them Like Children

The domestic-violence case against San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi did not start with a call from wife … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Shaky Grounds for Prop. 8 Ruling

Two of three judges on a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel on Tuesday found Proposition 8 unconstitutional.… Read More.

Culling Obama's Flock

Share Comment

Conservatives ought to be careful before they insist that Barack Obama further renounce his former pastor, Jeremiah Wright. This vicious guilt-by-association political game cuts both ways.

The left has used this game to marginalize conservatives. In 1993, the Rev. Eugene Lumpkin was fired from the San Francisco Human Rights Commission because he said he believed the Bible told him that "the homosexual lifestyle is an abomination against God." This year, critics called on GOP nominee John McCain to denounce supporter Pastor John Hagee, who called the Catholic Church "the great whore."

McCain said he did not agree with all of Hagee's views and later specifically repudiated Hagee's anti-Catholic rhetoric. As McCain told Fox News' Sean Hannity last week, "I think that when people support you, it doesn't mean that you support everything they say."

Obama's condemnation last week of Wright's over-the-top and downright racist statements should settle the matter as well — especially as Wright is retiring from Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ and no longer is one of Obama's many campaign advisers. Yes, I know what Wright has said. In 2003, Wright accused the American government of funding the drug trade and told his congregation not to sing "God Bless America," but instead, "God damn America, that's in the Bible for killing innocent people." Wright called the 9/11 attacks an example of "America's chickens coming home to roost." His church gave anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan a lifetime achievement award.

Obama has praised Wright as a former Marine who lovingly "preached the gospel of Jesus." Maybe. But Wright clearly had a strong hate streak going. You don't crow that the 9/11 victims essentially got what was coming, and not — at some level, anyway — hate America.

I have white friends who argue that they would walk out of a church where the minister spouted hatred against racial minorities; hence, they expect that Obama would do the same.

They note that Obama considered Wright a mentor and that the senator was a member of Wright's church for some 20 years — which suggests a close spiritual relationship, even if the Obamas were one family among 8,500 Sunday worshipers.

I appreciate their point, but they ignore a certain reality about being black in America.

To wit: In certain venues, a black man is going to hear anti-white comments from African Americans who have not had the extra something it takes to get ahead in this world. After a while, the buzz becomes background noise. That doesn't mean Obama buys into all their grievances — although he probably believes some and understands more.

Of course, most white voters don't want to elect a president who bears them ill will. That's why Jesse Jackson was never viable. He overplayed the race card. He sang a one-note whine of endless victimhood, which gave little recognition to the many opportunities now open to black Americans. On the other hand, Obama is a viable candidate because he is a black man with a foot in two worlds. With his Harvard law degree and Senate seat, Barack appeals to white America as a black success story. But even if Obama has grown beyond grievances, that doesn't mean Obama has moved beyond recognizing the grievances of underclass African Americans, who have fared less well in a world that can look at them with hostility.

It is simply no more possible to nominate a black candidate who does not recognize racial animus than it is to nominate a female candidate who, her Yale law degree and Senate seat notwithstanding, does not recognize the gender hurdles facing some American women.

"Obama should be held accountable for his beliefs," Sen. Dick Durbin, D- Ill., told reporters during a press call Monday. And: "To go beyond that I just don't think is fair."

Durbin is right. I hope he remembers those words the next time he wants to dump on a GOP supporter who talks outside the party lines. Not that I expect Durbin to resist the Democrats' double standards.

Here's the problem with the renunciation game. If it succeeds, you cut away nonpolitical people from a candidate — until only the carefully scripted professional political class has access to elected officials. You drive average citizens who speak their minds away from the process, so that only the nakedly ambitious need apply.

I've written whole columns against America haters who blamed this country — instead of the terrorists — for the 9/11 attacks. If Wright were running for office, he would get the full treatment for his race-baiting and delusional ramblings and for rhetoric that ill serves Chicago's black community. But as long as Wright is not drafting policy for Obama, he is entitled to his uninformed opinion.

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
For me, Rev. Wright is not the issue about Obama. It is a connection deeply entangled why there are so many American Haters of today.

You, and the rest of modern thinkers of this country has the responsibility to help inform the public about the truth of Obama.

You know for a fact that after Cold War, Communism and socialism have changed their color. They changed their principles into anti-war, freedom of religion, equality of gender, sex orientation but the brand of anti democratic capitalism, labor militarism and anti-private corporation, and government control of the economy remain. The dangerous thing is that they forgot about Patriotism and Love of Country. I guess there is a need to further investigate whether this ideology is hiding from the labels of "progressive" and "liberalism".

Why no patriotism? because they now believe in one-government for the world -they think this is the only answer to all global problems, including terrorism.

The Democratic Socialist of America and Communist Party USA have their roots in Chicago. Obama is product of Chicago ideology at the Hyde Park. Among the founders, Michael Harrington, had an objective of dominating Democratic Party using the strategy of fusion. Those states who allow fusion strategy are now the bedrock of socialism today in America.

Why are many democrats today? Because these movements are militants and persuasive. They know the main value of so-called "community organising". They have established good youth leadership and training in many universities.

Why CODEPINK, MOVEON, ACLU, Working Families, Progressive Alliance, Women Lib, RAINBOW/PUSH, and so on are rallying behind Obama? This is the reason why Hillary is technically dumped by the DNC. Because Howard Dean himself is a socialist, he had no shame in hosting the visits of European socialists to Washington in 2007.

Party of European Socialist, an affiliate of Communists Internationale, is too hopeful of Barack to win the election. A great triumph for socialist, according to its leader Rasmussen.

Why did the Democratic Party leaders allow this? Just for the sake of votes? They should be ashamed.

The Democratic Party of JFK is dead.

Those who now use his name are friends and supporters of Communism that he aggressively fought. This is not McCarthyism. We do not want to send people of such beliefs in jail. They have their own rights and reasons for beliveing the same, obtaining social justice, which is good.... but beware of addons. We advocate them to be open and transparent to their own identity and objectives for the sake of the honor of this people.

Let an informed American people decide whether it is now ready for socialism and give up Democratic Capitalism. By lack of transparency and information... .there is an immoral deception in their tactics.

The Win of Obama by November is a milestone, The birth of Socialist America.



Comment: #1
Posted by: seeker
Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:24 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

21 Dec 2010 President Obama Governs as Bush 44

16 Oct 2007 The Dean Wing of the Republican Party

5 May 2011 Insecure Communities