creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Saunders
Debra J. Saunders
14 Feb 2012
Obama Imposes Will in Contraception Compromise

From San Francisco, where I live, the controversy over the White House decision to require church-affiliated … Read More.

12 Feb 2012
To Make Women Safe, We Treat Them Like Children

The domestic-violence case against San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi did not start with a call from wife … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Shaky Grounds for Prop. 8 Ruling

Two of three judges on a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel on Tuesday found Proposition 8 unconstitutional.… Read More.

Bailing Out the Bailout

Share Comment

Until Wednesday afternoon, when GOP presidential nominee John McCain announced that he was heading to Washington to work with congressional leaders and the Bushies to craft a better bailout bill, both McCain and Democratic candidate Barack Obama clearly had believed that the last place they wanted to be seen was in Washington.

More specifically, the last place McCain and Obama wanted to be seen was in the Senate, where they work. You see, the Senate, according to the latest CNN/Opinion Research poll, enjoys (if that's the word) a 22 percent approval rating, 78 percent disapproval. (The numbers for President Bush, by contrast, are 31/68 approval/disapproval.)

The Senate has done much to deserve its sorry reputation. Until McCain's announcement, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid seemed inclined to support the $700 billion bailout bill — provided Democrats could lard it with their own goodies — but only if McCain (and other Republicans) would support the package and provide the Dems with political cover.

"I got some good news in the last hour or so ... it appears that Sen. McCain is going to come out for this," Reid announced Tuesday evening.

Then Wednesday, after it appeared doubtful President Bush would find the GOP support his plan needed, McCain announced he would come to Washington because, "I do not believe that the plan on the table will pass as it currently stands, and we are running out of time."

Reid's office promptly released a statement that said, "We need leadership; not a campaign photo-op." So the bailout is worth spending $700 billion of other people's money — but not worth McCain flying to Washington to broker a doable deal? Get the feeling Reid is completely out of touch?

I am no fan of this bailout package. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson failed to inspire confidence when he opposed a limit to the pay and bonuses of the geniuses who drove their funds into the red. At $700 billion, the package is obscenely expensive.

Worse, as the Washington Times reported, both the administration and Democrats had agreed to add consumer loans, possibly even credit-card debt, to the mix.

No wonder polls show that voters are to cool to the Bush bailout. If, however, McCain can broker a more fiscally responsible plan — read one with a price tag about half of the original's size or less, and with a cap on executive pay — he just might be able to broker a deal that can pass muster.

Washington solons seem convinced that a failure to act will result in the American marketplace seizing up. The Wall Street Journal editorial page — which has long railed at bad business practices at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — has supported the Bush plan on the grounds that an influx of capital, deftly managed, could keep a "global panic" from devolving into a full-fledged economic crash. The American people deserve to hear that "despite 13 months of credit turmoil," the Journal editorialized, "our resilient economy is still standing; and that this $700 billion will be the best money Congress appropriates this year if it prevents a recession and crash."

Wednesday, McCain asked Obama to meet in Washington and agree to postpone Friday's scheduled presidential debate. Once again, McCain put the job of good governance ahead of pursuing his presidential campaign. Only after Bush asked Obama to come to Washington did Obama relent.

If a bailout package passes and the market rallies, McCain will be a hero. If there is no package and the market falters, Obama won't look so hot. If there is no package and the market does not falter, Obama wins — as do American taxpayers. It is a breathtaking game of chicken — on which the U.S. economy may or may not ride. Be it noted that in the thick of battle, Obama's idea of leadership was to refuse to postpone the scheduled Friday night debate. Until he could not say no, Obama's idea of leadership was to stay out of Washington, instead issuing a "joint statement" with McCain on what they'd like see in the package other leaders negotiate.

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. To find out more about Debra J. Saunders, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Ma'am;... Having those two clowns in that ring actually detracts from the main show... That is the high wire act the government is going to walk, putting its life on the line, and our futures, to save a bunch of good for nothing loan sharks. I should be doing a dance right now. I am a revolutionary and I know revolutions are only possible when the government bankrupts itself for one stupid cause after the other. The only problem is that revolutions all clean up a lot of left over hatred, anxiety, and hard hard feelings. Bad governments can only rule by division, and you, and many of your opinion pushers serve that division. That is going to have to end. Will it end with a civil war, or a blood bath, or a reign of terror? Revolution requires no more than a change of forms, one form of government for another. Simple, and its over. Some parasites are going to find themselves without the wealth they have robbed from the country. Won't they be angry? Won't they want to fight, and won't they find willing soldiers in the angels of god? Come on... Let's change the form of our government before it gives up control of the society all together. Who can get control back when a mob of people is burning through Washington looking for their pension check, or their job, or their hope? We have never gotten what we should have from our government. You are a perfect example that we have no perfect union. If the government supports this bail-out, it is to save their own butts one more day, when; if they were good, and were Americans they would say that they have all failed us, and call a constitutional convention. We do not need a new bail-out that never helps bailout the common man, -what you call lard. We need a new government, and one we can all support. ..Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Sep 25, 2008 4:57 AM
This is how amnesiac partisans like you spin your silly lies. Somehow now McCain is for the bail out now that everybody knows it's going to go through (just last column you were against it--now you're for it), and of course that must mean Obama is against it and wants the American economy to tank. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Got news for you Babe--there's a third alternative to the two you pose that apparently hasn't crossed your little mind. If "the package goes through and the market rallies," that just means the market rallies, like it has all along when free money is thrown at it. The "market" is a bunch of termites eating at the foundation of our economy right now, and it is no indicator of anything more than denial and mindless greed still chomping, chomping, chomping away. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
The third alternative, in case you you haven't figured it out, is that the package goes through, the marker rallies for a little while, and then we don't live happily ever after. That would be because the basic problem with our credit-dominated model of economic growth (you know, spend what you don't have now and worry about paying for it later) has not been fixed, and Wall Street just got another free ride. And what a whopper this time.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Masako
Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:57 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Debra J. Saunders
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Terence Jeffrey
Terence JeffreyUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Alan Reynolds
Alan ReynoldsUpdated 15 Feb 2012

19 Oct 2008 Is Palin Presidential Timber?

11 Nov 2007 American Vampire

31 May 2010 Prose of the Politicos: You Don't Even Have To Read Between the Lines