creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Deb Price
Deb Price
2 Jun 2010
One Very Gay Time

"So tell me, America, how do I introduce Joyce?" I posed that question back in May 1992 in the … Read More.

26 May 2010
Martina, Always a Winner

This past Sunday, the kick-off day to the 2010 French Open, tennis legend Martina Navratilova was calling the … Read More.

18 May 2010
Elena Kagan: Supreme Poker Player

Elena Kagan is in line for a pivotal seat on the Supreme Court, the one being vacated by ardent gay ally … Read More.

Action Predicted on 'Don't Ask'

Share Comment

Responding to an offer by Barack Obama's transition team to answer ordinary Americans' questions, "Thaddeus" from Lansing, Mich., asked whether the incoming president planned to lift the ban on openly gay people serving in the military.

"Thaddeus, you don't hear a politician give a one-word answer much. But it's 'yes,'" Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs said in a video posted on the change.gov Website shortly before the official start of the Obama era.

But translating that one-word answer into reality without setting off a repeat of the 1993 circus on Capitol Hill will test the rookie president's skills and resolve.

Even longtime advocates of scrapping the ban differ over strategy.

Lawrence Korb, an assistant defense secretary under President Reagan, thinks the Obama administration should include repeal of "Don't Ask" with other proposed changes in personnel policies — such as adjustments in the size of the Army and Marines and in rules governing women in combat — when it sends its defense authorization bill to Congress.

"You don't want to have (repealing the ban) as a single debate," Korb said. "You want it taken up as part of broader questions on personnel issues.

"If Obama makes a strong statement at some point, it will make it easier to pass. I think it will be done by this Congress," Korb added.

But Aaron Belkin, a military scholar at the University of California at Santa Barbara's Palm Center, outlined a different approach to the Obama transition team: Issue a presidential order limited to suspending discharges of gay soldiers who are linguists fluent in Arabic.

"You signal to the gay community in a real way that you are serious," Belkin says, adding that several military lawyers agree Obama has the authority to take the step.

"You undermine opponents because who would dare criticize keeping Arab linguists in the military. And you get the military used to gay people serving openly in stages."

Aubrey Sarvis, head of Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, sides with Korb, arguing against creating a "hierarchy" of discrimination and instead banking on the many differences between 1993 and today.

Sarvis notes, for example, that Bill Clinton started off with an antagonistic relationship with the military.

Obama, in contrast, frames ending the ban in terms of a team goal: Whitehouse.gov — the official Website of the president — states, "The president will work with military leaders to repeal the current policy and ensure it helps accomplish our national defense goals."

Adm. Michael Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, has sent signals, as well.

Last May, a West Point cadet asked Mullen what happens if a president wants to change "Don't Ask." Mullen replied, "It's a law, and we follow it." But Mullen added that if the law does change, the military would obey that, too, the American Forces Press Service reported.

Meanwhile, high-profile opponents of openly gay soldiers in 1993 — including then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Colin Powell and then-Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee Sam Nunn — now say it's time for a fresh look.

The big unknown — whether Mullen and Defense Secretary Robert Gates will publicly side with Obama — may be answered soon.

If Mullen and Gates march in step with their new commander in chief, opponents of repeal would suddenly be at odds with the Pentagon.

Deb Price of The Detroit News writes the first nationally syndicated column on gay issues. To find out more about Deb Price and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Ma'am; you prove my point about better than any straight person could... Gays deserve equal rights because they are no different; not worse, and certainly no better than anyone else... To me, the military looks like a legal asylum for violent people...Why shouldn't gays be considered in this light??? Are they less violent, less brave, less ambitious, less calculating... I don't know why I would put my self in that situation...I am violent enough, but not at all given to discipline...But, then again; I don't talk politics in bars or out hunting because you never know when a nut might go off... So; if the gays become a target rather than invisible because they are not there; who told you it was a good idea??? They want it, let them have it...Don't ask why they want it...Why does anyone want in the military who has other alternatives???It is one of the poor people's last avenue to a better life, to greater opportunity, to prosperity... They should remember that dieing isn't much of a living... But who told them it was a good idea???It is just the only idea left for many, and those with any gumption have to stick to it... Yet, no one who picks up a gun with the intention of killing is a hero in my book, or a saint... Last alternatives should stay last... Tell that to any kid with raging hormones, and a rash of patriotism... It is a terrible fact that people put themselves by choice into situations where doing evil is as natural as following a chain of command...That is what all people, even Gay people should avoid at all cost...If you do violence, and if you do evil; do it on your own authority because no one can give you that authority....All we have to give in the way of authority to the government- is authority over our own behavior, to do good...If I cannot murder, I surely cannot give that authority... So never put yourself in a situation where some one says kill, and you must... You are still only killing on your own authority, but then you can excuse it... And the world already has enough excuses...Gays like straights should look always for an excuse to not do violence, understanding that no one really has that authority... Joining the military is fine; but if they cannot find justice outside of the military, what makes them think any cause in the military will be more just??? Do you see what I mean??? I am certain Gays and Lesbians can kill...I am certain they do it all the time... What is needed for all is not ability or willingness, but justification; by which I mean: true, legal, sprirtual, and moral justification... Guilt kills far more people than all of our wars combined... Avoiding guilt is more difficult by far than being a gay in the military..The advice I would give to you or to your gay friends or to anyone else is the same...Never surrended personal responsibility for your own good conduct.. ...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Mon Feb 2, 2009 9:32 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Deb Price
Jun. `10
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Jim Hightower
Jim HightowerUpdated 15 Feb 2012

16 Sep 2009 Obama Invites Gay Americans in

7 Oct 2009 Big Breakthroughs May Be Ahead for Out Candidates

15 Apr 2009 Obama Puts Out Rainbow-Colored Welcome Mat