creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
David Sirota
David Sirota
20 Nov 2009
Intelligentsia Against Intelligence

In the parlance of our times, the term "Idiocracy" means a nation run by idiots — and the … Read More.

13 Nov 2009
Where Are the Real Deficit Hawks?

Let's say you're a congressperson or tea party leader looking to champion deficit reduction — a cause … Read More.

6 Nov 2009
We Are What We Trade and How We Trade It

Trade and globalization — when not referencing blockbuster sports transactions or raucous street protests,… Read More.

With Their Magic Bullet, Dems Have No More Excuses

As counsel for the Warren Commission, Arlen Specter described a "magic bullet" that changed America. Four decades later as a U.S. Senator, Specter is providing another history-altering magic bullet — one Democrats will either fire off in a starting gun, or use in their suicide.

By leaving the Republican Party this week, the five-term Pennsylvania lawmaker eliminated the last Democratic rationale for inaction: the Senate filibuster. With Minnesota Democrat Al Franken expected to be seated soon, and now with Specter, Democrats will have the 60 Senate votes needed to overcome all parliamentary obstructions.

This legislative magic bullet will force Democrats to fulfill their policy promises and potentially commence an era of dominance, or fail and get annihilated at the polls.

No longer can they blame Republicans for stopping bills to reform health care, tax, defense and trade policy. In command of the White House, the autocratic House of Representatives, and soon a filibuster-proof Senate majority, Democrats will have total authority to do whatever they want, and no scapegoat to fault. That means, as ABC News' Rick Klein said, "This is Democrats' turn to govern, no excuses" — and it means we're about to find out whether their pledges were genuine.

Ever since the 1994 Republican takeover of Congress, Democrats have guaranteed "real change" if we give them back control of government. They've made this pledge despite helping Republicans deregulate the financial system and plunge the country into the Iraq War. And at every turn, they've blamed the GOP, rather than themselves, for gridlock.

When they temporarily took back the Senate in 2001 after Vermont Sen. Jim Jeffords' party switch, they said the Republican House would stymie their priorities — a logical argument that came true. When they won both houses of Congress in 2006, they said George W. Bush would veto their agenda — again, a fair assertion that proved correct.

When they won both Congress and the White House in 2008, they insisted they still couldn't do very much because their 58 senate votes couldn't overcome a filibuster — a less believable claim considering Obama's bully pulpit, but nonetheless at least mathematically valid.

It has been like watching a 15-year version of an Indiana Jones film — every time we think the quest to find the ark will be completed, there's been another twist, putting off the promised conclusion just a little bit more.

Of course, when Dr. Jones' adventure did eventually end and the ark was found and opened, it gruesomely melted the heads of those standing nearby as they euphorically screamed, "It's beautiful!" And, in fact, that's one possible outcome of Specter's announcement.

Sixty Senate votes do seem beautiful ... until 10 bought-off, right-wing, and/or weak-kneed Democrats decide to keep helping Republicans make the upper chamber our nation's single most powerful obstacle to "real change." When that happens, 60 votes become an ugly flame that sears the electoral flesh off politicians who technically have the power to act, but whose subsequent failure to deliver exposes their dishonesty.

The other possible outcome is actual progress. Even the most recalcitrant Democratic senators likely comprehend that in a 60-vote environment brimming with expectations, their continued alliance with Republican obstructionists could endanger their whole party and consequently their individual careers. They have to understand that it's one thing to vote against your party's universal health care promise when the GOP could already filibuster such a proposal — but it's quite another thing to cast a deciding vote against that promise when your party has all the power. That reality could forge a new cohesion necessary for results — and for an enduring majority.

It all depends on how Democrats use the magic bullet Arlen Specter just handed them.

David Sirota is the bestselling author of the books "Hostile Takeover" (2006) and "The Uprising" (2008). He is a fellow at the Campaign for America's Future. Find his blog at OpenLeft.com or e-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
More
David Sirota
Nov. `09
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 22 Nov 2009
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 22 Nov 2009
Connie Schultz icon
Connie SchultzUpdated 22 Nov 2009

16 Oct 2009 Good Health Care Policy Makes Good Politics -- And Vice Versa

22 May 2009 The House That Taxpayers Built

17 Apr 2009 Columbine Questions We Still Don't Ponder