creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
David Sirota
David Sirota
25 May 2012
A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Headlines transmit information in its rawest form — and the best of headlines crystallize indelible truths.… Read More.

18 May 2012
Yes, We Can Walk and Chew Gum

One of the most overused metaphors in a writer's arsenal is the one about "walking and chewing gum at … Read More.

11 May 2012
Our Guns and Butter Economy

With the economy still struggling and the debates over how to fix the problem more intense than ever, one … Read More.

Toward a New Politics of Food

Share Comment

The easiest way to explain Gallup's discovery that millions of Americans are eating fewer fruits and vegetables than they ate last year is to simply crack a snarky joke about Whole Foods really being "Whole Paycheck." Rooted in the old limousine liberal iconography, the quip conjures the notion that only Birkenstock-wearing trust-funders can afford to eat right in tough times.

It seems a tidy explanation for a disturbing trend, implying that healthy food is inherently more expensive, and thus can only be for wealthy Endive Elitists when the economy falters. But if the talking point's carefully crafted mix of faux populism and oversimplification seems a bit facile — if the glib explanation seems almost too perfectly sculpted for your local right-wing radio blowhard — that's because it dishonestly omits the most important part of the story. The part about how healthy food could easily be more affordable for everyone right now, if not for those ultimate elitists: agribusiness CEOs, their lobbyists and the politicians they own.

As with most issues in this new Gilded Age, the tale of the American diet is a story of the worst form of corporatism — the kind whereby the government uses public monies to protect private profit.

In this chapter of that larger tragicomedy, lawmakers whose campaigns are underwritten by agribusinesses have used billions of taxpayer dollars to subsidize those agribusinesses' specific commodities (corn, soybeans, wheat, etc.) that are the key ingredients of unhealthy food. Not surprisingly, the subsidies have manufactured a price inequality that helps junk food undersell nutritious-but-unsubsidized foodstuffs like fruits and vegetables. The end result is that recession-battered consumers are increasingly forced by economic circumstance to "choose" the lower-priced junk food that their taxes support.

Corn — which is processed into the junk-food staple corn syrup and which feeds the livestock that produce meat — exemplifies the scheme.

"Over the past decade, the federal government has poured more than $50 billion into the corn industry, keeping prices for the crop ... artificially low," reports Time magazine. "That's why McDonald's can sell you a Big Mac, fries and a Coke for around $5 — a bargain."

Yes, it is a bargain, but one created by deliberate government policy that serves the corn industry titans, not by any genetic advantage that makes corn derivatives automatically more affordable for the budget-strapped commoner.

The aggregate effect of such market manipulation across the agriculture industry, notes Time, is "that a dollar (can) buy 1,200 calories of potato chips or 875 calories of soda but just 250 calories of vegetables or 170 calories of fresh fruit."

So while it may be amusing to use Americans' worsening recession-era diet as another excuse to promote cultural stereotypes, the nutrition crisis costing us billions in unnecessary health care costs is more about public policy and powerful special interests than it is about epicurean snobs and affluent tastes. Indeed, this is a problem not of individual proclivities or of agricultural biology that supposedly makes nutrition naturally unaffordable — it is a problem of rigged economics and corrupt policymaking.

Solving the crisis, then, requires everything from recalibrating our subsidies to halting the low-income school lunch program's support for the pizza and french fry lobby (yes, they have a powerful lobby). It requires, in other words, a new level of maturity, a better appreciation for the nuanced politics of food and a commitment to changing those politics for the future.

Impossible? Hardly. A country that can engineer the seemingly unattainable economics of a $5 McDonald's feast certainly has the capacity to produce a healthy meal for the same price. It's just a matter of will — or won't.

David Sirota is a best-selling author of the new book "Back to Our Future: How the 1980s Explain the World We Live In Now." He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com, follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at www.davidsirota.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

7 Comments | Post Comment
The other day I heard a radio announcer say, concerning helmet laws, "I admit that I don't have a horse in this race." It is an old expression. How refreshing, to not have an opinion on something. Made up reasons to care what others eat, such as "It costs us 40 kajillion dollars every day because poor eaters spend an average of 45 minutes a day using the office facilities instead of sitting at their desk producing for the greater good" just have no inspiratioal effect upon me. You know what? I don't care what others eat. I wish more people didn't care what others eat. I think that people who care what others eat are wasting an average of 41 kajillion gigowatts of brain power every day, and that our country can't afford the costs of this brain drain in terms of lost wages and productive use of time.

Liberals have a horse in every race. Millions of horses every moment of the day. No wonder they a so harried.

Yeah, the money part is killing me, but next week Sirota will be telling me that millions will die if the debt ceiling isn't raised by 40 kajillion dollars; he won't remember the government subsidies that really could be cut, the ones he mentions today, and he won't hammer them home. Must be his diet.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Tom
Sat Jul 16, 2011 6:16 AM
I can't help but think you could reach a wider audience...really reach them by not calling their right-wing pundits blowhards. I'm betting half the country stops reading at that point. And a good chunk of that demographic is in the dark about what agribusiness behemoths , aided by the US Congress, are doing to our food chain and their pockets. The planet needs everyone's informed vote three times a day. And the first step is to make everyone aware of what's going on. Make them want to keep reading to uncover the facts. Like willing verses able, level of concern verses economic status will dictate whether people can or will take action. In many cases, which side of the take-action line one is on depends on whether they keep reading.
Hal
Kirkland, WA
Comment: #2
Posted by: Hal Bridges
Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:49 AM
Government Gone Wild!
Comment: #3
Posted by: Lee Zehrer
Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:51 PM
Tom may not care what other people eat. Does he care about how his money is spent? David, you're right to point out the effect of federal legislation on the price of different foods. I am definitely not happy with my tax dollars being used to subsidize meat, dairy, or corn. In fact, I don't want my tax dollars used to subsidize ANY agriculture products. The "free market" proponents should support an actual free market.
Regarding legislation, I would very much appreciate it if you could name (by bill #) some of the bills which are perpetuating the distortions to a food economy. I evaluate Congress by grading specific votes, and that is made easier when I can more easily identify which bills do what. As you can guess, Congress is very good at obfuscating and making garbage stew, so any spotlights on specifics is helpful.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Thomas
Sun Jul 17, 2011 8:26 AM
According to Mr. Sirota, $2.00 would buy about 420 calories of fruits and vegetables. If this is so, let's celebrate! We now know that it's possible to buy more than the recommended 7 daily servings of fruits and vegetables for about half of what it costs to buy a Big Mac. For example, the following fruits and vegetables add up to just 336 calories: broccoli (20 calories per serving), cabbage (16), carrot (30), chopped spinach (12), boiled asparagus (13), orange (65), banana (100), and apple (80).

It's a huge public service to let people know they can afford to eat healthy food – thanks, Mr. Sirota!
Comment: #5
Posted by: Deborah Binder
Sun Jul 17, 2011 1:28 PM
I agree, end the subsidies on corn, soybeans and wheat. Then to be fair, also end the subsidies on "green" energy like ethanol, windmills and solar. What do you want to bet that those who have benefited financially from the "green" subsidies have also coincidentally donated quite generously to the campaigns of the very politicians who pushed to have the subsidies enacted? Our politicians should not be able to enact legislation that favors some industries over others - - it just invites corruption.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Kim
Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:29 AM
The point of a government subsidy is (apparently) missed on some people. It's not that all subsidies are bad. A subsidy is a tool that can be used to effectively help a struggling industry whose help benefits the general public. Subsidies for the oil industry made sense at one point in time. But now that they are the behemoths that they are, the need for these subsidies is gone and are in fact counter-productive to our national energy security. Green subsidies are not about giving money to people so they can get rich. It's about helping these new industries do the research and development that needs to be done to make these new technologies be more cost-competitive and build up the economies of scale that they need to overcome the advantage that the dirty-energy industry has. So to be fair, you don't just get rid of all subsidies, you get rid of the ones that aren't needed/desired any more and keep or increase the ones that are in the public interest.
Comment: #7
Posted by: A Smith
Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:24 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
David Sirota
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

17 Jul 2009 China Is Here

29 Jan 2010 Our Addiction to Disaster Porn

28 Mar 2008 Is Wright Right About Racism?