creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
David Sirota
David Sirota
19 Sep 2014
Too Big to Punish

A few months ago, in a press conference about the felony conviction of Credit Suisse, Attorney General Eric … Read More.

12 Sep 2014
Shareholders' Quest for More Transparency

If you own a share of a company, how much information about the company are you entitled to? That is the … Read More.

5 Sep 2014
The GOP's Fear of Higher Voter Turnout

It is rare for a politician to publicly deride efforts to boost voter turnout. It is seen as a taboo in a … Read More.

Celebrating the End of Kids' Wall Street Dreams

Comment

Amid fears of high youth unemployment creating a "lost generation," there is suddenly a bright spot: Apparently, fewer young people are going to work in the industry that destroyed our economy.

That's the word from The New York Times, which reports that since 2008, "the number of investment bank and brokerage firm employees between the ages 20 and 34 fell by 25 percent," as banks have laid off young people and slowed college recruiting.

For young Wall Streeters, this is a bummer. But for society as a whole, it's cause for celebration because it may finally allow America to counter the destructive Gordon Gekko-ization of youth culture.

Recall that in recent years, up to a third of kids at elite universities have entered finance-related jobs. Such a mass shift in career preferences is, to put it mildly, alarming. A country whose best and brightest begin avoiding occupations that add value to society (doctors, engineers, etc.) in favor of vapid get-rich-quick gigs is a country that has stopped investing in itself and started mortgaging its future.

In light of that, Wall Street's youth layoffs raise a bigger question: Why have so many more kids been pursuing careers in finance?

Part of it is greed, as a 2010 Higher Education Research Institute report found a record-high three-quarters of freshmen said being "very well-off financially" was their top objective. Not surprisingly, many graduate with speculation and usury in their plans.

Such a mindset, though, hasn't emerged in a vacuum — it tracks two larger greed-driven trends.

The first is a change in the American Dream from a middle-class aspiration to an "MTV Cribs"-style fantasy. In that shift, we began portraying Wall Street fat cats as idols — the Great Men to be worshiped in our media and consulted by presidents. Taking cues from the larger culture, kids have naturally tried to follow in the idols' footsteps.

Simultaneously, the American economy changed from producing tangible assets to now more often generating paper profits for bankers.

The numbers, as recounted from economist Simon Johnson, tell that tale: "From 1973 to 1985, the financial sector never earned more than 16 percent of domestic corporate profits ... last decade, it reached 41 percent."

This metamorphosis was no force of nature — it was the result of bank-owned politicians deregulating and subsidizing the finance industry, turning it into a monster swallowing an outsized share of national wealth. That, in turn, prompted an employment shift, which included young people.

"When banks get 25 percent to 30 percent on credit cards, and 500 or more percent on payday loans, capital flees from honest pursuits, like auto manufacturing," author Thomas Geoghegan wrote in Harper's Magazine. "We set up the incentives to keep our best and brightest out of Detroit ... (They) went off to work at AIG."

Those incentives highlight the final part of the youth story: need.

Today, the average undergraduate graduates with $25,000 in student debt. That burden compels kids to base career moves on where they can get the richest the quickest so as to pay off their loans. In an economy that has privileged finance, that often means heading to Wall Street.

Now, though, that career path may be closed — and even if it's only temporarily closed, the reprieve is significant.

A few semesters worth of kids driven into occupations that build and sustain rather than cannibalize and leech could begin moving a nation back to economic fundamentals. It could mean kids finally appreciating that greed isn't so good and that policy debates — whether they're about regulation or student loans — aren't meaningless.

Ultimately, young people might see that those debates actually matter — and that they better get involved in them or their future will remain in jeopardy.

David Sirota is best-selling author of the new book "Back to Our Future: How the 1980s Explain the World We Live In Now." He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado. Email him at ds@davidsirota.com, follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at DavidSirota.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM



Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
What drove the obsession with the financial sector was the marginalization of the middle class. If you can't make it big, you probably won't make it at all. In historical terms, the broadly based middle class of the ‘50s and ‘60s was an anomaly. When the 70% and up tax rates imposed by the Depression and WWII were finally reduced to the 30% range during the Reagan administration, the breadth of the middle class began to shrink. Combined with globalization and the loss of manufacturing jobs that followed, we are left with a service-based economy that can only grow rapidly on “paper”.

An effective response seems beyond the grasp of politicians, economists, and the ideologues of the political divide. This impasse dictates nothing but reaction, with “proaction” seemingly elusive. Some redistribution of wealth remains the only possible stimulus, but so long as it is voluntary it will be nonexistent. When Willie Sutton was asked why he robbed banks, his answer was “Because that's where the money is”. If the top 1/1000th don't pony up, and soon, OWS could just be a harbinger of some more disruptive revolution.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Jeff Roy
Sat Dec 3, 2011 10:10 AM

I think it's great that students are starting to look at other careers, however a recent NY Times article suggests that they aren't going into STEM careers. Or if they try, they quit cause it's just too damn hard. Our future is still in serious jeopardy.

Comment: #2
Posted by: Steve
Sat Dec 3, 2011 7:51 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
David Sirota
Sep. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 22 Sep 2014
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 21 Sep 2014
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 21 Sep 2014

13 Apr 2012 The End of "Shut Up and Play"

15 Jan 2010 Right Is Not Center, but 2010 Resembles 1984

20 Jun 2008 Countering Race With Class