opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
David Sirota
David Sirota
25 Sep 2015
Should Companies Have to Pay Taxes?

Reading companies' annual reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission is a reliable cure for insomnia. … Read More.

18 Sep 2015
A Fight Over One of America's Most Important Waterways

Environmental groups and Democratic legislators are pressuring New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo to say that General … Read More.

11 Sep 2015
Prosecution of White Collar Crime Hits 20-Year Low

Just a few years after the financial crisis, a new report tells an important story: Federal prosecution of white-… Read More.

Can Government Create Jobs Or Not?


I'm confused by Republicans in Washington, and here's why: For most of President Obama's term, they have ignored the millions of jobs the Congressional Budget Office says the 2009 stimulus legislation created and instead argued that the government is incapable of boosting employment. Summing up the larger sentiment, Sen. John Kyl (R-AZ) in 2011 said "government spending doesn't create jobs," and Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) insisted in 2010 that "it's not the government that's going to create jobs in this country."

Fast forward to the present debate over impending budget cuts. Incredibly, the same Republican Party that once insisted the government can't create jobs is now barnstorming the country telling us the government can, in fact, create jobs — lots of them.

This isn't an exaggeration. As The Hill newspaper reports, Republican senators — many of whom suggested government can't create jobs — are hosting town hall meetings to sound the alarm about how proposed defense spending reductions "would cause significant job losses" and therefore hurt the economy.

Ayotte's rhetorical paroxysms are especially illustrative — and perplexing. In a CNN interview to promote the events, the New Hampshire senator — the same lawmaker who said "it's not the government that's going to create jobs" — implored Americans to "think about (the Pentagon cuts) in terms of jobs, 136,000 defense jobs in Virginia. They have to issue layoff notices before the election, so members of Congress need to come together on this."

So, as I said, I'm confused. Do Republicans believe government cannot create jobs? Or do Republicans believe the government is so good at creating jobs that we can't even minimally reduce the largest military budget in the world for fear of layoffs?

Because of the rhetorical backflips, there is no discernible answer to these questions — but there is an explanation for the contradictions.

Since at least the 1980s, Americans have been inculcated to think of the military as separate from "government" — even though the military is part of the government. In fact, it's not just any old part of the government — in terms of budget and manpower, it is one of the leading entities that puts the "big" in the concept of "Big Government." Yet, in discussions about national priorities and spending, many still reflexively see the Pentagon as wholly separate from everything else.

This is not just the view of Republican senators — it is a pervasive misconception in the larger population. As an example of that fact, behold an emblematic locale like Colorado Springs.

According to the Colorado Springs Business Journal, "One of every three residents of the (region) depends directly or indirectly upon the military" — that is, upon the government. That makes the area as close to a ward of the state as it gets in this country. And yet, because residents there (like many Americans) psychologically separate the military from "government," the city's Republican-leaning voters typically send anti-government conservatives to Congress. No surprise, these lawmakers often embrace the same contradictions as their Republican Party brethren in Washington — when it comes to non-military spending, they imply the government can't create jobs, but when it comes to military spending, suddenly they tout the government as a crucial force for job creation.

Of course, economic data suggest that in comparison to other government agencies, the Pentagon is a relatively inefficient job creator. But just like so many other public institutions, it does indeed create and sustain jobs. In doing so, then, the Pentagon is a stark reminder that Republicans' contradictory rhetoric on job creation isn't rooted in economic facts — it's driven by an ideology that circumnavigates inconvenient truths.

David Sirota is a best-selling author of the new book "Back to Our Future: How the 1980s Explain the World We Live In Now." He co-hosts "The Rundown" on AM630 KHOW in Colorado. E-mail him at, follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at



5 Comments | Post Comment
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha. Careful David, you'll confuse them! Great job!
Comment: #1
Posted by: morgan
Thu Aug 9, 2012 4:39 PM
One would wonder how the Federal Department of Home-Land Security was established with not hundreds of new employees, but thousands?
Comment: #2
Posted by: Jerrold Whaley
Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:57 AM
Of course the government can create jobs. Obama can create a government job for every unemployed American and reduce the unemployment rate to zero. If you think for a second that that is a permanent solution or a good idea, congratulations, you are an Obama-bot. The reality is that every government job must be funded by taxpayers. That takes away from the capital flowing in the free market. So while government has the ability to create tons of jobs, know that you'd just be delivering blow after blow to the goods and services in this country. And the free market is about to be KO'd
Comment: #3
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:28 AM
There is nothing to be confused about.

Republicans are simply major league hypocrites who are detached from fact and reality. They will say anything, even if it contradicts what they said just 5 minutes earlier, just to spin their latest talking points to their political advantage. They know that their Kool-Aid drinking followers are too stupid to question anything they spew forth and have absolutely no ability to experience the slightest cognitive dissonance with the two conflicting thoughts floating around the empty space in their heads.

But, Mr. Sirota, you are too nice to state the obvious.

And anyone who actually believes that there is really such a beast as "the free market", or doesn't believe that the government, though policy, can indirectly create jobs in the private sector, is at best disingenuous and at worst a CONserva-bot!
Comment: #4
Posted by: A Smith
Thu Aug 16, 2012 12:30 PM
Of course the government can create jobs, there is no doubt about that. The real issue in my mind is whether it is good for the economy to create them. Taxing the people to pay for government bloat and inefficiency at an accelerated pace are not the type of jobs we want to create. Once we start looking at the crimes and egregious boondoggles at Fannie Mae and GSA respectfully, natural challenges to programs to create "government jobs" come up. Once we start extending the analysis to include other areas of bloat/criminal activity/incompetence, people start having an issue with government jobs. Finally, if you look at the thousands of regulators who coerce businesses and free individuals to make bad decisions due to some ideology (e.g. fairness or morality), you begin to think that government needs to refrain from "creating jobs" less our whole economy gets destroyed. Perhaps that is too late.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Mike Hermens
Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:29 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
David Sirota
Sep. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 8 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 6 Feb 2016
diane dimond
Diane DimondUpdated 6 Feb 2016

8 Apr 2011 The Real Madness of March

31 Jul 2014 Clinton vs. Warren: Big Differences, Despite Claims to the Contrary

29 May 2014 Big Money Behind a Big Merger