creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh
18 Apr 2014
Feminist Thought Police vs. Feminine Kirsten Dunst

The left's tyrannical suppression of opposing views would be less farcical if leftists weren't such pseudo-… Read More.

15 Apr 2014
GOP, Don't Be Comforted by Sebelius' Resignation

As horrible as Kathleen Sebelius has been as this nation's health and human services secretary, she has been … Read More.

11 Apr 2014
Obama's Politicized, Lawless Executive Branch

Under the administration of President Barack Obama, as never before in my lifetime, there is reason to be a … Read More.

No Consensus on 'Stimulus' Bill

Comment

President Barack Obama has done more in the first three weeks of his presidency to validate the suspicions of his critics than I thought possible. But of all his objectionable actions, nothing compares to his falsely labeled "stimulus" bill, which he is trying to force upon us with fear and deception.

Just consider his smug assertion that "there is no disagreement that we need action by our government to jump-start the economy."

Maybe Mr. Obama has been cooped up in the White House too long and hasn't seen the dissent, such as that expressed in a strong protest letter signed by umpteen respected economists: "With all due respect Mr. President, that is not true. Notwithstanding reports that all economists are now Keynesians and that we all support a big increase in the burden of government, we the undersigned do not believe that more government spending is a way to improve economic performance." The letter cites the failed record of "stimulus" spending in the Depression era and in Japan in the 1990s and recommends lower tax rates and reduced government as the best remedies.

But even if you accept Obama's disputed premise that spending is the panacea, his bill fails his own criteria. It's just smoke and mirrors aimed at blurring his larger goal of radically restructuring the economy. But he pleads urgency anyway, as if he were trying to set speed records for breaking faith with the electorate.

The blogger Calafia Beach Pundit trenchantly observed: "Very little of the bill involves immediate stimulus or anything that might be actually stimulative; only a little over 10 percent of the money gets spent this fiscal year, and about 30 percent gets spent next fiscal year. … About 30 percent of the money goes to transfer payments. … Only $20 billion would be spent over the next 18 months on highway construction; and about 20 percent of the bill doesn't get spent until 2012-19."

Obama already lost his fabled cool while angrily wagging his finger at us from the Democratic retreat in Virginia (exemplifying that bipartisanship he promised), scoffing at the charge that his bill was all about government spending.

He said: "What do you think a stimulus is? It's spending. That's the whole point!"

With all due respect, sir, that's not the whole point. Even the "nonpartisan" Congressional Budget Office and your fellow Keynesians concede that not all spending has the same stimulative effect.

But we know you know that, sir, and that you are not about to let this "crisis go to waste." You have loaded up this bill with your party's pent-up wish list of pet pork projects and political payoffs: $345 million for Agriculture Department computers, $650 million for TV converter boxes, $15 billion for college scholarships, and untold, obscene amounts for ACORN-like "community organizing" causes.

Making matters worse, the CBO concluded that the bill would hurt the economy more in the long run than if we did nothing. Even if the spending helped stimulate in the short run, there would be so much additional government debt within a few years that it would crowd out private investment.

Worse still, The Heritage Foundation's Robert Rector says that of the $816 billion in new spending (based on the House bill), $264 billion (32 percent) of it "is new means-tested welfare spending," representing "about $6,700 in new welfare spending for every poor person in the U.S."

Outraged yet? Well, brace yourself, because Rector says: "The bill sets in motion another $523 billion in new welfare spending that is hidden by budgetary gimmicks. … The total 10-year extra welfare cost is likely to be $787 billion."

So here we are, poised to have this fraudulent, socialistic legislative monstrosity crammed down our throats that A) many reputable economists dispute will stimulate; B) is the type of disastrous remedy tried and failed in the 1930s and more recently in Japan and surely would exacerbate and prolong this recession; C) even Keynesians would agree contains non-stimulative pork; D) would plunge us so much further into debt that we should all be brought before criminal tribunals to answer to our children; and E) President Obama has ominously bragged is only a down payment on further Draconian measures he plans to unleash in the future.

Social commentators have observed that baby boomers are spoiled, self-indulgent narcissists. I'll say. If this legislation doesn't prove that, nothing will. When will we learn we are not gods who can spare ourselves of all pain with some magic bullet fired from our self-proclaimed genius?

Isn't it time we grow up, discard our hedonism, assume accountability and quit trying to buy our way out of this mess with our children's money?

David Limbaugh is a writer, author and attorney. His book "Bankrupt: The Intellectual and Moral Bankruptcy of Today's Democratic Party" was released recently in paperback. To find out more about David Limbaugh, please visit his Web site at www.davidlimbaugh.com. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;...I notice you are pretty good at counting billions...Do you think you could tell what upteen means exactly??? Maybe you could provide a link, or quote some of those economist -exactly.... The way I see it, we have already had plenty of welfare for the rich... I can't see where the welfare for the poor amounts to the welfare to the rich we have had to suffer to see the government go broke... How many billions do the banks have to get to make a loan??? Maybe they don't want to...Maybe they figure they will make more money letting the whole economy go to the brink...Maybe they know that is where it is headed anyway...In any event, if the democrats save the economy for your rich friends they won't have you to thank...And they won't have the republicans to thank... But if every thing melts down; and I would not like anything better; then a whole lot of people will know that their local republicans were to blame... You and I both know the republicans have the guns, and the cops and the army; and they may need them.... It does not matter how demoralized a people get, because they still have to eat...I don't know what you call welfare...If it keeps people on their butts with some chips in their hands in front of the toob, it is a sure bet they won't be making revolution... Just right for you....Too bad for me... But my bet is, that if the economy fails completely it will turn all the money to paper, and at that point the country will have no reason to feed the cities... That will be the beginning of mass starvation, or a general blood bath....I know you think it will never happen...Push things a little closer to the brink... I invite you...I dare you...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:51 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
David Limbaugh
Apr. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 21 Apr 2014
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 20 Apr 2014
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 20 Apr 2014

10 Apr 2009 A Christian Nation?

17 Jun 2011 A New Paradigm for the Left?

16 Jun 2009 America's Fatal Attraction