creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
David Harsanyi
David Harsanyi
15 Feb 2012
Commerce Is the Culture War

It's always curious to watch the champions of "choice" decide what choices to champion and what … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Obama's Halftime Hypocrisy

On Super Bowl Sunday, America was treated to the most expensive political commercial in history — … Read More.

1 Feb 2012
Republicans' Obamacare Problem

Once the presidential nomination process is settled — and Lord knows that day can't come fast enough … Read More.

Lenin or Lennon, It Still Stinks

Share Comment

Many Americans would agree that executives who accepted government bailouts should be huddled around chipped Formica tables at the Wichita Super 8 conference room rather than congregating at plush Las Vegas retreats.

But is it possible to place our frustration with corporate tone-deafness aside and be mildly troubled by the rigorous control Washington has seized by feeding on the fears and bloodlust of terrified citizens?

Why did we just allow the president to dictate the pay scale of private citizens working in the private sector?

If your answer is that those executives who take (and sometimes beg for) government assistance should be prepared to suck it up (and the salary cap bill is more political grandstanding than substantive capping), you are almost certainly morally accurate.

However, in Obama's trillion-dollar so-called stimulus plan rushing through Congress, nearly every sector of the economy will, at one point, allegedly have benefited from taxpayer bounty. Does this mean that all industries can be subjected to similar central control? And will D.C. continue to preordain economic winners, as it does in energy policy? Will it dictate the sorts of products industries must produce, as it does in the car industry?

To paraphrase Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, no serious crisis ever should go to waste. And this week, it was reported that House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, whose hands are all over the housing end of this mess, said that Congress also would look into extending compensation caps to all businesses.

All.

Obama stated that Wall Street execs will have a time "to make profits." He went on: "And there will be time for them to get bonuses. Now is not that time. And that's a message that I intend to send directly to them." On hearing Obama's comment, Jim Cramer, a well-known financial analyst, said (or, rather, yelled): "Let me tell you something; we heard Lenin." (Or maybe he meant Lennon. "Imagine no possessions"!)

Now, admittedly, Cramer can be a tad bit hyperbolic.

And though we didn't hear Vladimir Ilyich, we are hearing the creeping sound of centralized Western European top-down economics, which must be a wonderful system because even with all the glorious over-regulations, there is a deep recession there, too.

Obama and Frank, men who have managed a total of zero businesses between them, believe they have the fiscal acumen to dictate when profits should be made in the (no-longer-very-free) market. What happens when the next president — one you might not have the same unfathomable adoration for — begins injunctions on profit? Well, then, I suppose, we can call it an abuse of executive power.

In a Washington Post op-ed this week, Obama, who quickly has transformed from an inspirational candidate to the pessimist in chief, admitted that his spending plan "is more than a prescription for short-term spending — it's a strategy for America's long-term growth and opportunity in areas such as renewable energy, health care and education."

Well, then it is not a stimulus bill; it is a left-wing omnibus bill to restructure the economy without much debate. Unless you believe $4.2 billion for "neighborhood stabilization activities" — or any of the everlasting partisan pork in the bill — can save a job.

The executive pay cap bill may not be the end of the world. Many, though not all, executives were reckless, irresponsible and selfish. (The salary cap, incidentally, would not punish anyone retroactively, though it certainly would discourage competent CEOs from taking over troubled companies.)

Then again, what could possibly be more reckless than spending a trillion dollars you don't have on a plan that you have no evidence will work?

What could be more irresponsible than doubling the generational debt for your partisan pet projects in a time of crisis?

And what could be more selfish than stifling debate by deploying fear to induce voters into supporting it all?

David Harsanyi is a columnist at The Denver Post and the author of "Nanny State." Visit his Web site at www.DavidHarsanyi.com. To find out more about David Harsanyi and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 THE DENVER POST

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;...You know we will never have socialism in this country....We will not possibly ever have socialism in this country... We cannot ever possibly have socialism in this country....It may work for the Chinese...It may have brought the Russians from the fifth most industrial country to a second class world power in fifty years; but it will never work here because it will never get the chance...Everything that does not work about socialism will be brought to mind, and everything that works about socialism will be denied; but one thing that cannot be denied is that capitalism does not work...The government that supportscapital, that lays its life on the line, and the lives of its soldiers on the line for capital does not work either.... How does anyone expect to keep that fact hidden??? It would seem that the very failure of capitalism would be like a big flashing advertizement for socialism... Don't count on it....The people may some day recognize that capitalism is a waste of their lives, and that they will never get out of it what they have put in....But the sale has been made.... If we ever have socialism in this country it will be marketed under a new brand name.... We will never have socialism...People fear socialism...People hate socialism...If a neighbor coming to rescue a drowning man says it is a form of socialism, the drowning man will accept death...We may have socialism in this land, but only if we can find a catchy name for justice as an economy...No;... That will never happen because a corrupt people accepts the injury corruption does to them because they accept their own injustice from which they had hoped to profit....How can such people ever dream of justice...They can only fear justice...So we will never have socialism in this country... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Feb 5, 2009 8:44 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
David Harsanyi
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

24 Aug 2011 'Science' When It Suits Them

22 Sep 2010 A Wasted Decade? Hardly

20 Jan 2011 Fear of a Red Planet