opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
David Harsanyi
David Harsanyi
12 Feb 2016
The Unmaking of Marco Rubio

Did one robotic moment in a single debate really bring down Marco Rubio in New Hampshire, probably finishing … Read More.

5 Feb 2016
Obama's Mosque Speech Was a Dangerous Fantasy

For eight years now, the president has reprimanded the American people for their attitudes about Islam. And … Read More.

29 Jan 2016
What If Trump Wins?

There are many potential outcomes to a Donald Trump GOP nomination. And every one of them is a disaster for conservatives. … Read More.

Hookers Over Censors


The first case of prostitution probably dates back to the Paleolithic era, and the last instance of quid pro sexus most likely will take place whenever it is that human civilization finally expires.

The mere existence of crime is not ample justification to ignore it, of course, but most of us would concede that banning ads from the "erotic services" section of Craigslist will bring only a negligible change in the bottom line in harlotry.

So the crusade by 40 state attorney generals and other opportunistic politicians to control language on Craigslist — and social networking sites, such as MySpace — will have only long-term implications for free speech on the Internet.

The keyed-up moralistic campaign to force Craigslist to eliminate "erotic service" listings began in earnest when a Boston University student named Philip Markoff allegedly murdered a masseuse named Julissa after the two met on Craigslist.

This crime provided the opportunity for a number of state officials not only to imply that the site was generating criminal behavior but also to dictate what is permissible speech on the site.

Craigslist finally surrendered to the mounting pressure and will begin manual screening of an "adult" section and ban any "ads suggesting or implying an exchange of sexual favors for money … pornographic images, or images suggestive of an offer of sexual favors."

Obviously, it is the right of Craigslist to monitor content. But just as obviously, this change in policy was precipitated by the force and threats of government. Now merely "implying" illegal behavior or having participants meet on a site and later engage in illegal behavior is enough for attorney generals to threaten legal action. And what exactly did this victory over Craigslist accomplish?

Even if you don't believe, as I do, that consenting adults should be able to engage in any sexual relationship (even ones involving cash payouts) without interference, you probably still could concede that prostitutes meeting their johns online rather than on street corners is safer for them and healthier for all of us.

Moreover, about 20 million pages are viewed on Craigslist every month.

The number of criminal incidents springing from activity on the site is miniscule — or, I suspect, percentagewise, comparable to how many crimes stem from telephone calls, texting or smoke signals.

Finally, does any reasonable person believe that a murderer or pedophile will be dissuaded from his calling by this new policy?

Nevertheless, attempts to control Internet speech (in the end, impossible) are picking up pace.

Take, for instance, the 2006 tragic suicide of Megan Meier, who killed herself after being harassed on MySpace. It has led to a frightening attempt to crack down on speech. The Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act was introduced in the House of Representatives last month by Rep. Linda Sanchez, D-Calif.

Exploiting the suicide of a young girl, this proposed law would punish anyone who "transmits … communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using … email, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones, (or) text messages … to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior."

Imagine the wide-ranging latitude law enforcement would have in applying a law that allows them to judge "intent" and discern what is "hostile" language online.

How many e-mails, comment sections and blogs would fall under this category? How easy would it be to use this law to threaten political opponents or stifle debate?

Now, however serious the problems of "cyberbullying" or prostitution happen to be — and I believe they are wildly exaggerated — it's attacks on free expression that should cause us emotional distress.

David Harsanyi is a columnist at The Denver Post and the author of "Nanny State." Visit his Web site at To find out more about David Harsanyi and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at




2 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;...I do not want to rise in defense of prostitution... Quite the opposite; but Craigs list is not the problem...I will stand opposed to the notion that congress should ever make a law for the benefit of single individuals, or even probable small numbers of individuals....Is there really an issue around children being driven to suiicide??? Are there not some remedies already for children driven to suicide by adults??? But to see the congress able to get together to aid dead individuals while millions wait for good government is a savage spectacle...As far as the desire to end prostitution; it should not come at the loss of civil rights, and I will suggest that the congress licks its lips, and tears into rights at every opportunity, and this is but the latest example... But we do not need a law to rid ourselves of prostitution...All we need is justice... It cannot be shown where sexual injustice does not attend economic injustice...If you want to end sexual injustice, all you have to do is get rid of capitalism... People trade sexual intimacy to avoid pointless labor that is better than slavery in name only...Prostitution can be better defended than capitalism because the damage is less, the pollution is less and the risk of war is less... It is hardly of benefit long term to either party, but it is obviously preferable to relationships sterile in fact and seeming sterile as well...To me, there is much more hope in prostitution than in capitalism...Capitalism is just another name for death... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sat May 16, 2009 6:03 PM
good article. our elected officials are catering to the sterile . the conservative purists who do their screwing in a closet while their trophy wives hold their coats. sex, human touch and physical interaction are not only desirable by all healthy humans but are necessary. we can't all have campaign workers and office assistants to screw when we feel like it. sex is fun when safely performed.
the world would be much happier with more sex and less shame and guilt. if our politicians want to protect me from the nastier types in the world then they should quit and move somewhere else to live.
it seems like governments are always looking for a reason to get into our lives and our wallets.
money for sex, why not. it's one of the few honest transactions left that isn't taxed. thanks, bob
Comment: #2
Posted by: bob breen
Mon May 18, 2009 6:58 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
David Harsanyi
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
David Harsanyi
David HarsanyiUpdated 12 Feb 2016
Suzanne Fields
Suzanne FieldsUpdated 12 Feb 2016
Patrick Buchanan
Pat BuchananUpdated 12 Feb 2016

21 Jul 2010 Obama's Lack of Faith

12 Jun 2013 The Left's Phony Defense of Freedom

12 Sep 2014 Actually, Senators, You're the Ones Who Threaten the Country