Opinion> David Harsanyi> Don T Fear Debate Fear Its End

	15 Feb 2012 Commerce Is the Culture War It's always curious to watch the champions of "choice" decide what choices to champion and what … Read More.
	8 Feb 2012 Obama's Halftime Hypocrisy On Super Bowl Sunday, America was treated to the most expensive political commercial in history — … Read More.
	1 Feb 2012 Republicans' Obamacare Problem Once the presidential nomination process is settled — and Lord knows that day can't come fast enough … Read More.

Don't Fear Debate; Fear Its End

Some time ago, a highly charged argument was set in motion. It pitted evolution against the Creation. One side of this debate relies on scientific inquiry, and the other relies on ancient mythological texts. That's my view. That's what I intend to teach my children.

Yet I have no interest in foisting this curriculum on your kids. Nor am I particularly distressed that a creationist theory may collide one day with the tiny eardrums of my precocious offspring.

Which brings me to the Texas Board of Education's recent landmark compromise between evolutionary science and related religious concerns in public-school textbooks.

The board cautiously crafted an arrangement that requires teachers to allow students to scrutinize "all sides" of the issue. This decision is widely seen as a win for pro-creationists — or wait, are they called anti-evolutionists?

"Texas has sent a clear message that evolution should be taught as a scientific theory open to critical scrutiny, not as a sacred dogma that can't be questioned," explained John West, who is a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute, which is an anti- … a Charles Darwin-hating group that argued that students in Texas should have a right to review "all of the evidence."

What damage is there in challenging assumptions and "dogma"? None, of course. We should be fostering critical thinking in our youth. Allowing an inquiry into evolution, I believe, will almost certainly confirm its existence in the minds of millions of children.

Next up: a critical analysis of the existence of God in public schools.

But there is a deeper problem here. Why are so many allegedly tolerant and science-loving Americans aghast at the notion that their beliefs will be scrutinized in schools? Are school systems reflections of the population's diverse viewpoints or places of political control? Should school boards shut down debate on a topic that millions of Americans still disagree on?

Until we jettison the antiquated one-size-fits-all public education system, the majority of students will endure some seemingly preposterous objections to fact, useless sex and/or abstinence programs, historical textbooks that are mockeries of history, and/or truly questionable science employed for ideological purposes.

Which one works? Which one is true? Which one is better? It's often a matter of perception and largely irrelevant.

What do parents want their children taught — or, perhaps, which controversial ideological topic would they like to avoid — is the real question. Why should a 1-vote majority on a school board resolve an issue for an entire community?

I wish everyone believed in the overwhelming evidence of evolution, but that's not the case.

Not long ago, board members in Texas removed a textbook reference asserting that the universe is about 14 billion years old (based, I assume, on an episode of "Nova"), because the board's chairman believes that God created the universe less than 10,000 years ago (based, no doubt, on faith alone).

On the 200th anniversary of Charles Darwin's birth, Gallup conducted a poll that showed only 39 percent of Americans say they "believe in the theory of evolution," while 25 percent of Americans say they do not believe in the theory. Thirty-six percent don't have an opinion. (My hope is that 36 percent does not have an opinion regarding evolution as I do not have an opinion about other indisputable scientific truths, such as osmosis and the yeti.)

The most sensible solution, of course, would be to permit parents a choice so that they can send their kids to schools that cater to any brand of nonsense they desire — outside of three core subjects.

The left never will allow any genuine choice in our school systems. So it seems highly disagreeable and political to trap kids in public schools and, at the same time, decide where schools fall on controversial issues.

To scrutinize "all sides" is no sin. And in the decidedly collective school systems we've set up for our diverse population, it's the best solution we could hope for.

David Harsanyi is a columnist at The Denver Post and the author of "Nanny State." Visit his Web site at www.DavidHarsanyi.com. To find out more about David Harsanyi and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.

Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment

Sir; ..... I would find it easy to agree that the end of the debate is a problem were it not for the fact that the religious right, in fostering their nonsense actually do a positive injury to all the people.... Should we be concerned if they only teach their children their particular brand of tripe???Should we be concerned if they batter their children about their heads with a blunt object??? Why should we be concerned about the physical health of their children while their intellecutal health is poisoned??? We all pay for educatation and we all expect that children educated today will grow to carry this society as we have done... Can we count on people with religion for brains for anything??? The religious tilt the political table so the fruits of society run their way... They prevent the good of intelligent government from being achieved... While the necessary functions of government are ignored, the religious make an issue of false morality, and ideology... They do not use their freedom of religion to worship freely, but use it actively to evade taxes and bedevil the political system with their anti scientific nonsense.... If religion worked as a form, people would not need government... If prayers worked, people would not learn science... Religion is not a path to truth but a path to power for preachers and politicians...Who are those people to interfere with the process of education??? Who are those people to attack our rights, and use their tax advantage to do it???.I don't care what people believe, but if they believe in God they should trust in God and let people use politics for the common good...Government should be the place where rational people meet to judge the future, and adapt to it...If half the people are living in a dreamscape of ideology and faith, the rest will not be able to drag them into a happy future without some advantage...Consider sir; that this nation was made out of the enlightenment and the age of reason...The rest of the world has put away superstition, and teaches science and technology....This nation should grow up, and put away childish things, and give up thinking as children... It is only because we were so blessed with space and wealth that we could afford all this mumbo jumbo impeding education and government...The future belongs to the educated and aware, and we have the world kicking our butts in this regard...It is time for religions to get out of the way if they are not going to help this country forward...Thanks...Sweeney

Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Apr 3, 2009 3:06 PM