creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Daily Editorials
25 May 2012
In Changing World, America Prevails

Ken Langone, a co-founder of Home Depot, said the other morning on the business show Squawkbox that in 10 years,… Read More.

25 May 2012
The Once and Future Ron Paul

Ninety-two years ago, H.P. Lovecraft wrote a story called "The Terrible Old Man." The title pretty … Read More.

24 May 2012
Two Wrongs Regarding a Wright

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the conspiracy-spouting crackpot who was once Barack Obama's pastor, has been the … Read More.

What's French for 'Bailout'?

Share Comment

We suspect that if Congress had asked, American taxpayers would have emphatically explained they don't want to pay to bail out failing companies. Nevertheless, Congress approved $700 billion in late 2008, ostensibly to stabilize the financial system by injecting tax money into banks and other financial institutions.

Most Americans, it seems likely, would have had even greater reservations about this massive redistribution of their wealth if they understood their hard-earned taxes were to be deposited not only in the vaults of American financial institutions, but, to a large extent, would have a far greater impact overseas, compared with how foreign governments' bailouts affected the U.S.

The $700 billion TARP fund sent unspecified billions of dollars to big banks in France, Germany and other nations, according to a report based on calculations from a congressional watchdog.

"Most other countries, by contrast," reports the Associated Press, "focused their efforts more narrowly on banks in their nations that usually lacked major U.S. operations."

Simply put, U.S. taxpayers disproportionately subsidized faltering foreign banks, while foreign nations generally kept their subsidies within their borders.

Once again, U.S. taxpayers were tapped as the world's sugar daddy, while our friends overseas concentrated on taking care of their own.

The U.S. sent money to about 700 banks, while all other governments combined aided fewer than 50. In just one example, of the 87 financial entities benefiting from U.S. aid to insurance giant American International Group Inc., 43 were foreign, located in France, Germany, Canada, Britain and Switzerland. The congressional report said that if the U.S. had known more about which foreign banks would benefit, the government might have asked those countries to share costs.

"There were no data about where this money was going," congressional oversight panel chair Elizabeth Warren said. "The American people have a right to know where the money went."

We agree. However, we also believe most Americans would just as soon keep their money as turn it over to the government, let alone distribute it around the world. It's prudent to know where money is headed before cutting the checks. But before that, the government should consider whether taxpayers like the idea at all.

REPRINTED FROM THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Newspaper Contributors
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

15 Nov 2010 High Court Mulls Video Game Ban

4 Jul 2008 When Will the U.S. Admit Mistake on Ethanol?

31 May 2010 Athens, U.S.A.