creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Daily Editorials
25 May 2012
In Changing World, America Prevails

Ken Langone, a co-founder of Home Depot, said the other morning on the business show Squawkbox that in 10 years,… Read More.

25 May 2012
The Once and Future Ron Paul

Ninety-two years ago, H.P. Lovecraft wrote a story called "The Terrible Old Man." The title pretty … Read More.

24 May 2012
Two Wrongs Regarding a Wright

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the conspiracy-spouting crackpot who was once Barack Obama's pastor, has been the … Read More.

Taxpayers Shouldn't Pay for UAW's Rich Health Care Benefits

Share Comment

One reason the public so distrusts the health care plan being considered by Congress is that so many troublesome details keep bubbling out of the massive legislation.

The latest example is the $10 billion taxpayers will be asked to shell out to prop up the United Auto Workers' retiree health insurance program.

That provision is tucked deep into the bill passed by the House.

In effect, it would ask every taxpayer, regardless of whether they'll have health insurance coverage themselves after they retire — and most won't — to chip in to maintain the UAW's coverage, which even after the union's givebacks is still better than what the average American worker receives.

The helping hand is a recognition by Congress that the union's volunteer employee benefit association, or VEBA, can't possibly stay solvent if it is asked to cover all of the union workers taking early buyouts from the Detroit automakers.

So the union's supporters added language to the House's gargantuan health care bill that requires the federal government to pick up most of the cost of catastrophic claims for union retirees age 55 to 64.

The biggest beneficiary would be the UAW, which got $60 billion from the Big Three in exchange for taking on the obligation for retiree health care.

But the bankruptcies of General Motors and Chrysler forced the UAW and President Ron Gettelfinger to swap $24 billion of the VEBA payments for stock of uncertain value, and now a fund that was supposed to last for 80 years is projected to be depleted in 12 years.

Unless, of course, the union sharply trims retiree benefits.

That's a step it ought to take, but doesn't have to as long as it has friends in Congress.

But even the $10 billion giveaway in the health care bill won't be enough to keep the VEBA solvent. Benefit cuts are inevitable.

As Congress works to hammer out a health care reform bill that everyone can live with, payoffs like this one to a key Democratic constituency shouldn't survive.

Taxpayers should not be stuck paying for union benefits they didn't negotiate and, for the most part, don't enjoy themselves.

REPRINTED FROM THE DETROIT NEWS.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Newspaper Contributors
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

13 May 2011 Cool the Rhetoric on Immigration

12 Jun 2009 Health Care Priorities

26 Sep 2008 Taxes: No Hablo Ingles