creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Daily Editorials
12 Feb 2016
Absenteeism is a Crisis in Parenting

We have a crisis on our hands as it goes to the education of our youth. And it's not about the quality of the … Read More.

12 Feb 2016
Obama's Wishful Budget Can't be Taken Seriously

When President Obama submitted his proposed budget one year ago, he claimed that he wanted to do away with … Read More.

10 Feb 2016
Federal Budget Deficit, National Debt to Soar

The omnibus budget deal and accompanying tax breaks for businesses and individuals that congress agreed to in … Read More.

Privatize the Post Office

Comment

The U.S. Postal Service has increased rates so often in recent years that they came out with the Forever Stamp, which is good for a first-class mailing into the indefinite future. On July 6, the USPS proposed another increase, a two-cent hike, to 46 cents, in 2011. That's a 4 percent increase. Rates for other types of postage would increase a similar amount. After review by the Postal Regulatory Commission, the rate increases then must be approved by the Postal Service Board of Governors.

The proposal comes on the heels of increases in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. As recently as 2005, a first-class stamp cost only 37 cents. So if the 46-cent rate is approved, that would mean a 24 percent increase in just six years.

Meanwhile, the Internet and text messaging on mobile devices continue to demolish the USPS's mainstays of personal letters and bill-paying. According to a report by the Newspaper Association of America, USPS mail volume has declined 17 percent, or 36 billion pieces, in three years. Its deficit for fiscal 2010, which ends Sept. 20, is projected at $7 billion. That means Congress would have to bail out the USPS with tax money.

To deal with its problems, the USPS has proposed eliminating Saturday delivery, saving $3 billion a year; although the PRC says the savings would be $2 billion.

The proposed stamp-rate increase would bring in an estimated $2.3 billion for the first nine months of 2011.

"Only with a government service would you increase prices and decrease customer service in the face of declining demand for your service," Tad DeHaven told us; he's a federal budget analyst at the Cato Institute and next month will publish a research paper on the USPS.

What's needed, he said, is competition — ending the USPS's monopoly on first-class mail. UPS, FedEx and other services can compete on delivering packages, but not on first-class mail. "Other countries, especially in Europe, are starting to liberalize their postal services. In the United Kingdom, they're selling shares in Royal Mail," that country's postal service.

He said there are two choices. First is subsidization by Congress, meaning taxpayers would be forced to underwrite a bloated government bureaucracy. The other choice is privatization, bringing to bear the efficiencies and innovation of the marketplace.

We would add that USPS workers should not fear privatization. As with other businesses grappling with the information revolution, change will be difficult — but essential, and transforming.

REPRINTED FROM THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM



Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Newspaper Contributors
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 13 Feb 2016
diane dimond
Diane DimondUpdated 13 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 13 Feb 2016

16 Dec 2014 We Should Be Candid, at a Minimum, About Wage Hikes

3 Mar 2015 Clinton Foundation May Cost Hillary

5 Dec 2014 Police Body Cameras a Good Idea; Using Federal Dollars For Them Is Not