creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Daily Editorials
25 Nov 2009
'Big Tobacco' Rolls a Fast One

Some tobacco companies have pulled another one on the federal government. By relabeling their product, the … Read More.

25 Nov 2009
A Dinner Date

For many of the world's countries, there's an informal but intense competition to land an invitation to be … Read More.

24 Nov 2009
Renounce 'Pray for Obama' Trend

Christians and Jews, it is time to take a stand and defend the book of Psalms from a disgusting new trend. A … Read More.

President's Pay-As-You-Go Plan Guarantees Higher Taxes

On the surface, it seems the height of fiscal responsibility — if Congress adopts an expensive new health care entitlement, it has to find a way to pay for it.

That's the challenge delivered by President Barack Obama, who urged lawmakers last week to adopt pay-as-you-go legislation to cover the cost of his health initiative. So-called pay-go rules require Congress to cut spending somewhere else or raise taxes to cover the cost of a new program. But it doesn't work that way.

When pay-go was law between 1991 and 2002 and control of Washington was mostly split between the two parties, Congress still added more that $700 billon to the budget deficit, and simply ignored pay-go when it chose to, according to Brian Reidi of the Heritage Foundation.

With the White House and Congress under the control of the Democrats, who have shown little interest in spending cuts, chances of a budget reduction are remote.

Obama promised to cut waste but so far has come up with just $17 billion in savings, or a half-percent of the budget.

Pay-go also doesn't cover the 40 percent of the budget that is discretionary spending.

A pay-go mandate for a health insurance bill will guarantee a tax hike. This entitlement will be so expensive it will require a broad tax hike that will touch every taxpayer.

And it should.

Right now, Most Americans who have employer-provided health insurance are responsible for some of the cost. There's no reason they and their employers shouldn't continue to pay a portion of the insurance once the new government plan is in place.

If Congress adopts national health insurance, it should fund it with a payroll tax similar to Social Security or Medicare.

That's the more hones way to pay for this budget buster than pretending the enormous costs will be covered with elusive spending cuts.

REPRINTED FROM THE DETROIT NEWS

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
More
Newspaper Contributors
Nov. `09
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
John Stossel
John StosselUpdated 25 Nov 2009
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 25 Nov 2009
Brent Bozell
L. Brent BozellUpdated 25 Nov 2009

6 May 2009 National Guard Troops on the Border Can Yield Dividends

16 Jul 2008 Snow a Compassionate Voice for Conservatism

27 Dec 2008 It is Past Time for Zimbabwe's Mugabe to Go