creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Daily Editorials
15 Feb 2012
Internet Oversight Bill Rebooting

"Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty," abolitionist Wendell Phillips warned in 1852. Nothing'… Read More.

15 Feb 2012
Contraception Uproar Precedes Bigger Health Care Debate

On Friday, President Barack Obama wisely quelled a political uproar that might never have erupted had he … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
Stop Fooling Around With Payroll Tax Cut

On the payroll tax cut, Republicans are playing tiddlywinks. Democrats are playing poker. President Barack … Read More.

Health Care Priorities

Share Comment

The prospects for genuine reform of the nation's broken health care system will likely turn on how Congress deals with two nettlesome questions: How will the government pay for reform? Is it wise to also offer a plan run by the federal government?

We already know, of course, that President Barack Obama favors a public plan. And this idea just might work with the proper safeguards. But there is legitimate concern from Republicans and Democrats alike that a government plan would crowd out private health insurers.

The question of paying for whatever Congress devises is even dicier and probably will have to include some sort of unpopular new tax — possibly on at least a portion of individual health benefits.

But any plan first should include incentives to wring efficiencies from the system, which should result in significant savings. A recent article in The New Yorker examined why health care costs so much more in McAllen, Texas — one of the most expensive markets in the United States — than in El Paso.

It concluded that doctors in McAllen were much more likely to prescribe treatments of all kinds.

Any reform plan must get a grip on runaway costs. Health spending accounts for about 18 percent of gross domestic product today but is expected to rise to nearly a third of national economic output by 2040 without action.

Any plan must cover everyone — including young, healthy adults — which argues for mandatory insurance. About 46 million people in the U.S are uninsured, an abomination.

Participants should be able to keep the plan they have now, but there should be a menu of options. Choice, in other words.

Insurers shouldn't be allowed to cherry-pick the healthiest people based on age or pre-existing conditions.

Prevention should be a priority.

This is the best opportunity for real reform in years, but the window for political action won't stay open for long. Congress should act — and act prudently — to ensure that every American is covered.

But lawmakers should not simply create a new entitlement without fully addressing costs.

REPRINTED FROM THE MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Newspaper Contributors
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

5 Feb 2010 Obama's Right Stuff

6 Jun 2011 Who Oversees the Overseers?

10 Aug 2011 Stock Market Making the Case for Cuts