creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Daily Editorials
17 Feb 2012
Criticism of Welfare Programs Focused on Wrong Recipients

It's easy to criticize government benefits when somebody else is receiving them. Consider the national war on … Read More.

17 Feb 2012
Obama Budget More a Campaign Ad

President Barack Obama is basing his re-election bid on a platform of tax and spend. That was reaffirmed … Read More.

16 Feb 2012
Mr. President: Take a Stand on Entitlement Spending

President Barack Obama can reasonably claim that his new budget is fairer and less dishonest than the ideas … Read More.

Gitmo Controversy Comes to Thomson

Share Comment

Not surprisingly, the administration's decision to move about 100 of the prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba to a maximum-security prison in the little Illinois town of Thomson has drawn criticism from across the political spectrum. There is validity to these criticisms, but the decision looks more like a least-worst choice than a disaster.

The Thomson Correctional Center in northwestern Illinois is a state maximum-security prison, opened in 2001 but never fully utilized because of state budget issues. The administration wants to buy the 1,600-bed facility and use part of it for general federal prisoners, while the Defense Department will run one section of it for prisoners from Guantanamo, who are to be isolated from the rest of the prison population.

Critics from the right argue that bringing the Gitmo prisoners onto U.S. soil could make a small rural town a target for future terrorist attacks.

Critics from the left complain that holding prisoners indefinitely without trial just changes the location of Guantanamo, not what makes it objectionable.

There's a possibility that Thomson could become a potential target for terrorists. But maximum-security prisons are not exactly soft targets, and small rural towns buttressed by 3,000 federal security personnel are not the best environment for terrorists.

As for the complaint that keeping people locked up without charging them with any offense is a violation of our constitutional traditions and the rule of law, of course it is. But it should have become abundantly clear by now that the Obama administration — more vulnerable than the Bushies to charges of being soft on terrorism — is not about to give some of these people trials.

Justifiably or not, Guantanamo has become a symbol terrorists have used for recruiting. Closing it is important, but the latest brouhaha shows once again that it won't be easy.

REPRINTED FROM THE KINSTON FREE PRESS

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Newspaper Contributors
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

2 Aug 2008 Chronic Problems

29 Sep 2010 Show, Don't Tell

25 May 2010 Last Chance for a Bad Climate Bill?