creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Daily Editorials
6 Nov 2009
Cooling Down the Climate Zealots

The world can breathe a sigh of relief. Unnecessary economic destruction at the hands of climate zealots is … Read More.

6 Nov 2009
Difficult To Say Obama Saved Jobs

Washington claims 640,000 to 1.5 million jobs have been created or saved by the $787 billion economic … Read More.

5 Nov 2009
Seeking a Less Catastrophic Way To Cool Global Warming

People often talk as if warming temperatures are the only evidence of human-induced global climate change. … Read More.

Economy Killer

Congress is moving forward on legislation to dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but it could seriously damage the economy by increasing the costs of energy.

The legislation, called the Waxman-Markey bill after its two chief sponsors in the U.S. House, Henry Waxman, D-Calif., and Edward J. Markey, D-Mass., would impose a cap primarily on carbon emissions. Permits for emitting carbon would be auctioned by the government. Businesses could then buy and sell them among themselves, which is why the legislation is called cap-and-trade.

The goal of the bill is to bring U.S. greenhouse gas emissions 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and ultimately 83 percent below 2005 levels by 2050. It does nothing less than call for a major restructuring of the U.S. economy. It is worth noting that the emissions slated for reduction in this legislation grew by nearly one fifth between 1990 and 2007.

Supporters of Waxman-Markey have been busily handing out credits and exemptions to various industries that would be hurt by the legislation. U.S. Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., signed on after the auto industry was promised 3 percent of the federal government's revenue from emissions permits for five years, which would be worth billions of dollars. The revenue is linked to investments in new vehicle technology.

The industry has also been promised up to $50 billion in new technology loans.

Similar deals have been made with utilities and other energy producers and industries. The Wall Street Journal reports that 85 percent of the permits in the Waxman-Markey bill have been given away for the first 20 years of the proposed regulatory regime to win support.

But American consumers would still wind up paying more for goods and energy. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the average cost of the 2020 goal would be about $1,600 per household. Even after signing on to the bill, Dingell worried that the 17 percent reduction would be too much for a "fragile economy" and came out for President Barack Obama's original proposal of a 14 percent reduction.

Backers acknowledge the effect on consumers, which is why it includes a provision for states to route money from the permit revenue to low-income households — yet another wealth transfer scheme by this administration.

The legislation also includes a mandate that utilities buy 12 percent of their electricity from renewable sources such as wind and solar power. But the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that by 2030 wind and solar power would supply just 5 percent of the nation's electric power.

Waxman-Markey is a huge, convoluted tax system based on utterly unrealistic expectations about technology developments with unforeseen and possibly disastrous economic consequences.

REPRINTED FROM THE DETROIT NEWS.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
More
Newspaper Contributors
Nov. `09
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 8 Nov 2009
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 8 Nov 2009
diane dimond
Diane DimondUpdated 7 Nov 2009

22 Oct 2009 Heed the Red Flags Over Red Ink

21 Apr 2009 The United States and Latin America Must Seize This Point in History

30 Sep 2009 Raising Ethanol Levels in Gas Wouldn't Pay Off