creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Daily Editorials
25 May 2012
In Changing World, America Prevails

Ken Langone, a co-founder of Home Depot, said the other morning on the business show Squawkbox that in 10 years,… Read More.

25 May 2012
The Once and Future Ron Paul

Ninety-two years ago, H.P. Lovecraft wrote a story called "The Terrible Old Man." The title pretty … Read More.

24 May 2012
Two Wrongs Regarding a Wright

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the conspiracy-spouting crackpot who was once Barack Obama's pastor, has been the … Read More.

Celebrate Freedoms; Don't Dilute Them

Share Comment

Why do we need protection from the First Amendment?

From the way people in Washington are acting, you'd think that the U.S. Supreme Court had unleashed some evil monster back in January when it upheld First Amendment rights for corporate citizens in the "Citizens United" case. The opinion said that corporations could spend money on political speech, although bans on direct contributions from corporations to candidate committees were upheld.

Self-labeled campaign reformers have sounded more like Chicken Little than voices of reason. They've called for new measures that make campaigning more convoluted in both the nation's and states' capitals. They've even pushed to put more tax-financed campaign programs in place.

Folks, the sky is not falling.

So far, those who follow the money say, the "Citizens United" case has not unleashed a massive amount of corporate cash flowing into campaigns. While some think corporations will hold off in this year's midterm elections before pushing ahead full-throttle in 2012, others question whether corporations really have all that much money to spend on political campaigns.

Even if corporations do decide to spend on political campaigns, there's no reason to believe that they all jump on board with one particular candidate or party.

Corporations are pretty diverse, both in their products and services and in their owners' political leanings.

Take a look at Walmart and Whole Foods as examples. The top brass at Walmart, the national retail giant, climbed on board President Obama's national health care plan. Meanwhile the head of Whole Foods, a natural foods retailer, strongly opposed the plan.

New burdensome regulations aimed at making participation in the public discourse more complicated aren't necessary. Neither are public financing schemes, which end up forcing many taxpayers and businesses to pay for political speech for which they may disagree, are necessary or welcome.

Our Founding Fathers knew what they were doing when they included the First Amendment freedoms in the Bill of Rights.

Today, we should celebrate those freedoms, not dilute them.

REPRINTED FROM THE NEW BERN SUN JOURNAL.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Newspaper Contributors
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

14 Dec 2011 Clear the Records of Marine Pilots

3 Mar 2009 Increase Pell Grants, But1 Year at a Time

13 Jan 2011 Claiming the Constitution