creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Daily Editorials
17 Feb 2012
Criticism of Welfare Programs Focused on Wrong Recipients

It's easy to criticize government benefits when somebody else is receiving them. Consider the national war on … Read More.

17 Feb 2012
Obama Budget More a Campaign Ad

President Barack Obama is basing his re-election bid on a platform of tax and spend. That was reaffirmed … Read More.

16 Feb 2012
Mr. President: Take a Stand on Entitlement Spending

President Barack Obama can reasonably claim that his new budget is fairer and less dishonest than the ideas … Read More.

A Promising Study

Share Comment

Supporters of abstinence-only have been touting the results of a recent study that showed better results with such a program than with the comprehensive approach favored by others. And, following years in the Bush administration in which abstinence-only funding gained steam and popularity, national teen births ticked upward.

In the first event, there is a lesson to be learned — just not precisely the one the abstinence-only folks claim. In the second, we have yet another reminder that, despite more promising statistical trends locally, this is no time to let down our guard.

About the study. The Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine reported that 662 African-American sixth- and seventh-graders were divided into four different sex ed programs — eight hours of abstinence only, eight hours of safer sex only, eight to 12 hours of a program that combined both and an eight-hour program on non-sex-related health issues.

The study tracked the youngsters and found that the abstinence-only program achieved the best results: 33% having sex over the next two years; 42 percent for the comprehensive program.

Here's what to keep in mind (besides that none of these results are what anyone should call sterling).

Even the study's authors say no one should pin a strategy on any one study. The abstinence-only here featured a non-moralizing approach — waiting until you're ready, for instance, rather than waiting for marriage. And it also did not affect condom use — a safe-sex option.

It's interesting that abstinence-only boosters have latched onto this study as validation, though the approach differs from many such programs. Meanwhile, the boosters for comprehensive sex ed are expressing interest in a way of teaching abstinence better through evidence-based strategies, though not willing to jettison other evidence-based tools in the tool belt based on one study.

That's where we end up as well. Intrigued but thankful that the state Senate just approved a Healthy Youth Act mandating that, if a school district teaches sex ed, it take a comprehensive approach, including abstinence.

And we view the increase in teen births nationally as even more reason to proceed with the full tool belt approach.

REPRINTED FROM THE MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Newspaper Contributors
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

22 Apr 2009 Linguistic Faux Pas

4 Oct 2011 Black Conservative May Trump Race Card

15 Jul 2011 Obama Administration Labor Rule Changes Unfair to Employers