creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Daily Editorials
17 Feb 2012
Criticism of Welfare Programs Focused on Wrong Recipients

It's easy to criticize government benefits when somebody else is receiving them. Consider the national war on … Read More.

17 Feb 2012
Obama Budget More a Campaign Ad

President Barack Obama is basing his re-election bid on a platform of tax and spend. That was reaffirmed … Read More.

16 Feb 2012
Mr. President: Take a Stand on Entitlement Spending

President Barack Obama can reasonably claim that his new budget is fairer and less dishonest than the ideas … Read More.

'Big Tobacco' Rolls a Fast One

Share Comment

Some tobacco companies have pulled another one on the federal government. By relabeling their product, the companies are avoiding a punitive tax placed on roll-your-own tobacco products.

Congress and the Obama administration raised taxes on tobacco products earlier this year, with taxes on tobacco for roll-your-own cigarettes skyrocketing from $1.10 per pound to $24.78 per pound. That's more than a 2,000 percent jump.

Ostensibly, the tobacco tax increases were to pay for expanding children's health insurance programs. But such an increase on roll-your-own tobacco was obviously meant to do more then help pay for pediatricians. Some predicted that the tax would kill the roll-your-own industry, which had portrayed itself as a cheaper alternative to packaged cigarettes, according to an Associated Press story.

Former Chief Justice John Marshall once said, "The power to tax involves the power to destroy." It's obvious that Congress and the administration intended to use the roll-your-own tax as a means of destroying the industry.

That is wrong and the antithesis of what the government should be doing and the purpose of taxation.

The legitimate power to tax is to help pay for the functions of government.

It shouldn't be used to redistribute income, affect behavior or destroy an industry.

Tobacco companies have found a way to escape this destructive tax. They're relabeling the merchandise as pipe tobacco. The tax on pipe tobacco is significantly less expensive — $2.83 per pound.

Generally, the Associated Press report notes, pipe tobacco is coarser and moister than cigarette tobacco. But there's no law requiring it to be. And apparently, the only distinction in federal law is the way it's labeled.

Certainly, tobacco use and abuse has led to many health problems. Those ailments include lung cancer, respiratory diseases and heart disease. The effects of smoking have taken far too many lives prematurely.

Yet many people in our nation, despite knowing the research, the dangers and the statistics, continue to smoke. Quite frankly, we wish they'd choose to quit.

But that choice should be made based on their own desire and motivation, not based on a tax policy that seeks to make their habit cost-prohibitive.

A free nation should not invoke a punitive tax policy for anything.

REPRINTED FROM THE NEW BERN SUN JOURNAL.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Newspaper Contributors
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 19 Feb 2012

4 Feb 2009 Strip 'Buy American' Rules From Stimulus Bill

17 Nov 2010 Blame Government for Bedbug Bites

6 Nov 2009 Difficult To Say Obama Saved Jobs