creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
8 Feb 2012
Funny Man, Karl Rove

After I saw the new Chrysler ad — starring Clint Eastwood and titled "Halftime in America" … Read More.

1 Feb 2012
Komen Caves, Women Pay

The Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation has severed its ties with Planned Parenthood. As a result, … Read More.

25 Jan 2012
Answer the Question, Candidate Gingrich

You may have noticed that most of the presidential debates are moderated by men, which gives female … Read More.

With Identity Comes Online Civility

Share Comment

A few months ago, an exchange with a reader prompted my own experiment with online anonymity.

It started after I accepted a self-identified conservative's request to be my "friend" on Facebook. My goal with Facebook is to coax out a wide range of views in discussions to illustrate how we humans have more in common than we may want to think.

To jump-start conversations, I post links to stories, columns and videos, and sometimes I pose questions about particular issues. Recently I started posting the name, rank and hometown of every American killed in Iraq or Afghanistan.

I ask only that everyone engage respectfully. The discussions are lively and long, and it's heartening to watch a network of strangers grow into a community of neighbors regardless of what they do for a living or where they call home.

Many express a relief to learn that civil — and informed — discourse is still possible in this country. As one mother posted last week, "I haven't been this tuned into current events since college."

For a while, the man I mentioned earlier was a spirited but courteous dissenter. In June, he started to ramp up the rhetoric — and the heat. Some reprimanded him for hurling insults. When I asked him to keep a civil tongue, he backed down and posted an apology.

But there was something about his phrasing once he decided to attack that sounded familiar. I went to The Plain Dealer's Web site, Cleveland.com, where, like most newspapers, we allow anonymous comments that often churn into a vitriolic brew. Sure enough, I spotted identical phrasing, augmented with personal attacks that he knew would have gotten him kicked off my Facebook page.

I sent one of the more offensive posts to him in an e-mail and asked whether it was his. He acknowledged that it was. When he didn't apologize, I decided our Facebook friendship was over.

He behaved so differently when his picture and his name were attached to his opinions. I have since added hundreds more "friends" to Facebook, and similar circumstances have unfolded only a handful of times. We get fired up, but we seldom lose sight of our mutual humanity.

Some in the newspaper industry insist we have to allow anonymous comments to generate traffic on our Web sites, which in turn determines what we can charge for online ads.

They fear that we'd lose online readership if we required identities with comments. Discussion, they fear, would evaporate.

Anonymity on the Web offends most journalists I know, and not just because their own names go on everything they write. It breaks every rule newspapers have enforced for decades in letters to the editor, which require not only a name and a city of residence but also contact information to confirm authorship.

Anonymous comments also alienate many thoughtful readers, who constitute the majority of people who read newspapers. When readers complain to me about ugly comments, I urge them to weigh in, but most balk. It's like trying to persuade your friends to visit a great tavern in a bad neighborhood; they want nothing to do with that side of town.

An editor of another online news site in Cleveland told me his site screens comments before they're posted, in part because he believes the caliber of conversation affects the enthusiasm of advertisers.

"You can't monetize jerks," he said.

Recently The Plain Dealer's Cleveland.com underwent an upgrade, which includes new features in the comment sections. Readers now can create their own online profiles, and their comments are aggregated, making it easy to read all of any individual's posts. The theory is that even though they're still anonymous, those who regularly engage in abusive comments will moderate their venom because of push-back from other readers.

My concern is that readers will continue to despair that the worst anonymous comments represent a growing crowd in America. Yet reader response via e-mail and voice mail — and my daily interactions with people on Facebook and around the country — assures me that this is not true.

Most Americans believe civility matters.

They also believe it comes with a name.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and the author of two books from Random House, "Life Happens" and "... and His Lovely Wife." She is a featured contributor in a recently released book by Bloomsbury, "The Speech: Race and Barack Obama's 'A More Perfect Union.'" To find out more about Connie Schultz (cschultz@plaind.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
I find this very same problem in a lot of comment sections and have asked our local paper, The Mansfield News Journal to look into this flaw within their comment section because many can use the 'report abuse' feature to irradicate an arguement while continuing to harass opponants unmercifully. The problem is, it not financially feasable to have someone review each comment. The smaller paper in Mount Vernon uses wordpress which does require moderation. I suggested to the News Journal to have on file the name of each contributor in case they cross the line.
Being the wife of a representative doesn't make your job any easier, either.
I agree with your point in this matter. If we want our representatives to be accountable, then so should we.
Thanks. John C. Davidson Bellville, Ohio
Comment: #1
Posted by: John C. Davidson
Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:44 PM
Thanks for this column! One of the wonderful things about the internet is that it allows such broad communication. Had I not seen you on a TV show I may never have read your books or Senator Brown's book on trade policy. I now know much more about many issues than I would otherwise. I have been amazed at what goes on at Cleveland.com. I see nothing positive from allowing the comments to get completely out of control. The same standards that are applied to letters published in the paper should be applied to comments. The instant part of the internet is not so useful if it causes what I see. If there are a few that cannot work with that, then they can move on. There is always the Drudge Report or whatever.

Nothing that can be done will completely dissuade those that want to be disruptive from being so. I think that we have seen that at some of the meetings held to discuss issues this summer. I am hopeful that the new format being adopted by PD will moderate things to the point where a level of civility is attained. It is interesting to get viewpoints from people that live in another part of the country from Southern California but not when is is so venomous and discouraging. Looking forward to coming back. Thanks, Jim Grissom
Comment: #2
Posted by: JRGrissomCA
Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:42 PM
Here's my problem. I am a conservative politically and find comments like: "If there are a few that cannot work with that, then they can move on. There is always the Drudge Report or whatever." tend to make me wary of posting with my name. Perhaps I am being hypersensitive. I don't think so. My local paper finally did some clean up of its anonymous comments pages. From reading them you'd think that we are a people who can't spell, punctuate, or express an opinion without tearing down different races, even when the article had nothing to do with that. But it is this sort of dig which upsets me the most. it says that while "broad communication" seems to be the objective, my comments probably will receive short shrift or label me a...can't actually choose which word to use...
BLUhrig
Comment: #3
Posted by: BB
Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:37 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

28 Jun 2009 Finally, a Real Plan To Save Newspapers

7 Apr 2010 Non-Catholics Are Grieving, Too

10 May 2007 The Difficult Work of Being in Love