creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
23 May 2012
Catholic Leaders Must Dial Down the Rhetoric

As a non-Catholic, I wrestled with an internal conflict over the birth control battle of the bishops. Part of … Read More.

16 May 2012
Dear Young Mothers: Ignore Time Magazine

In February 1989, I ended a phone interview for a magazine story I was writing and looked up to find my 21-month-… Read More.

9 May 2012
Finally, the President Says 'I Do'

This was going to be a different kind of column. My friend Jackie, through a mutual contact, arranged for me … Read More.

We Can Be Sisters to Mothers We've Never Met

Share Comment

Surely, you and I can agree on this: No child in America deserves to live in poverty.

Yet a record number of children in this country — experts say nearly 25 percent — will not have enough to eat or a place to call home at some point this year.

We know this is wrong. We also know how to help — even if we don't yet realize it.

Last Sunday, CBS' "60 Minutes" reporter Scott Pelley told the story of poverty in America by digging deep into the despair of Seminole County, Fla., which is one county away but worlds apart from Walt Disney World. Seminole has so many homeless families that school buses now stop outside cheap hotels to pick up and drop off hundreds of children.

If you haven't seen Pelley's report, you can watch it online at http://tinyurl.com/4k53ggk.

Warning: He talks to a lot of children, and their hard-earned wisdom might bring you to your knees. As Pelley admitted in an online interview, he fought tears after asking a diverse group of children whether the electricity ever had been turned off at their homes. Virtually all of the young hands shot up in the air.

Pelley blinked, cleared his throat and asked how they do their homework.

The children rattled off their makeshift alternatives: Emergency flashlights. Candles. One boy explained, "I go out to the car and turn on the overhead and read out there and study."

After watching Pelley's report, the question loomed: How can we help?

There's always the political route. We can pressure elected officials — through calls, letters and protests — not to slash funding for programs that offer vital lifelines to these children and their families. That is a necessary but prolonged battle, waged by sturdy souls. It's not for everyone.

We can give money. If you want to contribute, search online or call any house of worship for the nearest shelter or food bank.

But here is a third option, particularly for mothers who never have spent a day worrying about how their children will eat or learn: We can share our time and our experience.

We can be sisters to women we've never met.

Dr.

Ellen L. Bassuk, president and founder of the National Center on Family Homelessness, said in a phone interview that poverty disproportionately derails the lives of single mothers.

"To a large degree, this is a gender issue," she said. "Family composition has changed. The number of women heading households has grown, and so their numbers in poverty have grown."

The trend of families crowding into cheap hotel rooms should alarm us, she said.

"Nobody sees them, and so they may be at greater risk," she explained. "They aren't visible like they are in shelters. They have no protection, no services.

"They have no access to cooking facilities, either, and no place for kids to play. And there are a lot of mothers with newborns and infants. They put the bottles in the back of toilets to keep the milk cold. When the baby's up, everybody's up. The mothers never get a break."

That's how other mothers could help, Bassuk said.

"A lot of women are good mothers," she said. "They know how to care for kids. A group of mothers could volunteer to read to the children. They could create developmentally appropriate play spaces at shelters or create after-school programs."

Most shelters and school administrators would welcome such efforts, she said, and provide guidance for setting them up.

Doing this would help children and their mothers.

"Volunteer mothers could offer a much-needed respite for these mothers," she said, "and give them some space."

Any devoted mother knows the restorative value of a brief break from the children she loves.

That's why mothers take care of mothers. We always have, and we always will.

Surely, on this we can agree.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and an essayist for Parade magazine. To find out more about Connie Schultz (cschultz@plaind.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Thank you for many of your suggestions on what we can do and how we can help short of the political route. But typical of any liberal-leaning journalist, she has suggested we write letters to politicians not to slash funding for vital programs. It is too easy to say that answer. But how are we going to pay for it? With persistently high-unemployment and wages severely depressed, and the huge numbers of underemployed the tax base has shrunk severely. We cannot leave funding at current and growing levels if the tax revenue is not there to pay for it. If we raise taxes to keep paying for this many of the middle-class families that are just hanging on are going to slink further into poverty because after the larger chunk they have to pay in taxes is going to erode their ability to pay for basic necessities. The government must do what the majority of us have done in these tough times and that is to live within its means. I am lucky enough not to have to worry about paying for the bills, but that is because my husband and I have chosen to not overspend and get in high-debt, we also choose not to have kids because that would put us over the edge. We must do more to fight poverty in this country but we also have to wake up to economic reality. The government cannot continue to spend like there is no tomorrow. It clearly has not worked to get the economy going again. Even now the fragile recovery is threatened by inflation related to the skyrocketing gas prices. I hope everyone who can afford it can drop off some items at a local shelter, but please help yourself too by saving up again for a possible job loss in the future.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Lynn
Wed Mar 9, 2011 4:20 AM
It would be automatically solved, in a large part, if there were fewer children and fewer people. Contraception, sex education, sterilization, and abortion choice would eliminate or limit the accidental, unplanned, unwanted, unaffordable,poorly-planned-for or poorly-parented children.

Less overpopulation also is fewer people to divide up the same finite resources. Unplanned or unwanted children not born to people who are already in poverty is less addition to poverty.

Not having quantity instead of quality would lead to a condition of fewer, higher quality people. (Higher quality ethically, more intelligent, more able to support themselves and others, more able to discern the problems of overpopulation. Translating for the less intelligent ones: this has *nothing* to do with race. Duh.)

Lower-quality, higher-poverty life conditions seem to go with the position of women as breeders, and have less sex education, and less choice in birth control. It usually has a forced religion overruling the choices of individuals, especially women.

This is a big "DUH"!

Another symptom of low intelligence in the populace is treating the symptoms instead of the causes. As in medicine, treating the symptoms is a necessary *first* step, but high intelligence would seek to repair the causes. As long as people are looking only at the symptoms and not addressing causes like overpopulation and unwanted children, poor family planning, lack of individual choice, religion forcing people's lives, and the *simple* problem of too many people sharing finite resources, your "war on poverty" will never be won.

You can't wage "war" on an abstract concept, a word, or a symptomatic social condition anyway. That's another silly, illogical concept.



Comment: #2
Posted by: OccamShave
Wed Mar 9, 2011 7:45 AM
Re: OccamShave

Wow, I don't like Schultz but you are terrifying; A sort of Freud cum Mengele.

Arrogance permits you to "translate" for the "less intelligent ones".

Inflated self-esteem causes you to suggest "sterilization". For others, no doubt, not someone as grand as you.

All of these "finite" resources, which ones are you doing without? Your misery is one letter removed from miserly. Is there not enough air for you to puff out your chest with?

Religion is bad because it never occurs to you that at some moment it may have lifted man spiritually. Of course not, you see no spirit in others. How could you when Spirit means "Divine Breath"? You deign to share nothing of the sort with ordinary people. I'm not a religious man, but if I were would you sterilize me out of existence?

I guess I'm not as intelligent as you and your Spock-like aversion to illogical concepts such as love and devotion, faith and hope, charity to all. Maybe that's why I don't want to sterilize anyone, judge the quality of their life and weigh that against my own interests.

Don't worry so much about the rest of us, I bet you alredy have your solitude, your time alone to seek out the best parts of your personality and intelligence. Puleeze spend no time or intellectual energy concerning yourself with us.

But, Schultzy, do you see the flies that are attracted to this sort of writing style? Get off the "mothers, daughters, sisters, brothers" kick you are on these days. A call to arms may mean just that to some people.

Gotta go kiss my babies now, an unexplainable, illogical, and less than intelligent urge has hit me. They and I have good reason to need it. Sort of a spiritual shower seems in order. Hope OccamShave can spare the water.

Comment: #3
Posted by: Tom
Wed Mar 9, 2011 10:57 AM
Lyn hit it right on the head. I'd much prefer to spend our limited resources on America's children than on two wars that we aren't winning and are going right back to the way they were before we got there. Waste of money, time, and lives.
Comment: #4
Posted by: capiscan
Wed Mar 9, 2011 1:55 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

14 May 2008 Women Know It Ain't Over When It's Over

31 Aug 2007 The Real Mother Teresa is Even Better

2 Mar 2011 Another 3-Ring Statehouse