creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
23 May 2012
Catholic Leaders Must Dial Down the Rhetoric

As a non-Catholic, I wrestled with an internal conflict over the birth control battle of the bishops. Part of … Read More.

16 May 2012
Dear Young Mothers: Ignore Time Magazine

In February 1989, I ended a phone interview for a magazine story I was writing and looked up to find my 21-month-… Read More.

9 May 2012
Finally, the President Says 'I Do'

This was going to be a different kind of column. My friend Jackie, through a mutual contact, arranged for me … Read More.

We Are the Women

Share Comment

For the past week, the front section of The New York Times' Dec. 28 issue has been sitting on my kitchen counter in Ohio, growing increasingly crinkled from use and sprinkled with circles, arrows and the occasional exclamation point.

The recent wave of anti-choice legislation in my state and across the country has made me keenly aware of attacks on women in America. Perhaps that is why I was so drawn to the Times' stunning chronicle of women's lives. I still can be astonished by how regularly the target of masculine rage is women.

From Somalia: A rape victim, draped in long folds of soft gray fabric, stood alone in a room, her face buried in her hands. She is one of thousands of women and girls being gang-raped and abused by militants who seize them as the spoils of a "holy war."

From Cairo: An administrative judge ruled that the Egyptian military violated female demonstrators' human rights by forcing them to undergo "virginity tests" meant to humiliate them.

From Israel: An 8-year-old girl whose parents are Orthodox Jews was terrified of walking to school, after ultra-Orthodox men spat on her and called her a prostitute because her modest dress failed to meet their more rigid dress code. The incident ignited outrage in Israel and around the world.

From Baghdad: Photographer Andrea Bruce captured the shy smile of 24-year-old Duaa Saad, an engineer caring for her mother and six sisters in the wake of her father's death. She is risking her life because she is a woman learning to drive in Iraq.

From Islamabad: Two young women held photos of the late Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, four years after she was murdered at a political rally in Rawalpindi. They look mournful — and defiant.

I hesitate to draw the comparisons. In America, women can drive cars and vote, and they wear whatever they want in public. Rape — by civilians or men in uniform — is a felony. As a group, we do not fear for our lives.

However, 2011 in America was a rough year for women's reproductive freedom. The Guttmacher Institute reports that in the first three months alone of 2011, legislators in 49 states introduced 916 measures related to reproductive issues.

More than half the measures — 56 percent — seek to restrict, sometimes eliminate, abortion access.

Why, after all that 2010 campaigning on jobs, jobs, jobs, do so many Republicans want to wage this war on our women?

When politicians restrict women's legal right to abortion, they threaten multiple aspects of a woman's life, from her physical and emotional health to the economic stability of her family. Only a fool believes this assault on women will prevent abortions. Only a self-serving zealot celebrates putting so many women's lives at risk.

I am writing this from my office in Ohio, where the so-called heartbeat bill, which would ban virtually all abortions, stalled last month at the eleventh hour. The bill, which is almost certainly unconstitutional, has divided Ohio Right to Life and left it in shambles. Bill sponsors vow to revive the legislation this year.

Yet I am hopeful for the future of women, in many places, for many reasons.

In Ohio, young women are swarming pro-choice gatherings in Ohio in numbers I have not seen for two decades. They are the energy we needed.

In Somalia, an outspoken widow, named Fartuun Adan, is leading a group to help rape victims and speaking out for those who are too afraid to come forward.

In Israel, thousands of citizens protested the attack on that little girl, and a group of ultra-Orthodox clergy publicly denounced the men who terrorized her.

In Baghdad, 22-year-old Isra Saadi is playing the tuba. This is an amazing thing. "No women have ever played it here before," she told the Times. "All of the women and men criticized me. But I have loved it ever since I first saw it. I hope that I have shown there is no difference between men and women."

In Egypt, after a young protester was stripped to her bra and beaten by militia, thousands of women flooded the streets of Cairo. "Drag me, strip me, my brothers' blood will cover me!" they chanted. "The girls of Egypt are here."

We are the girls of Egypt.

We are the daughters of America.

We are the survivors in Somalia.

We are the protesters in Israel.

We are the women of the world.

We are undefeatable.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist and an essayist for Parade magazine. She is the author of two books, including "...and His Lovely Wife," which chronicled the successful race of her husband, Sherrod Brown, for the U.S. Senate. To find out more about Connie Schultz (con.schultz@yahoo.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM


Comments

14 Comments | Post Comment
Connie...with this column you have, in my opinion, taken on the mantle of Judy Mann, one of the most wonderful columists of my generation, whose voice was silenced far too soon. Thank you for this. And may you continue to advance our society with your focus, honesty, and eloquence!
Comment: #1
Posted by: Amanda Tyler
Wed Jan 4, 2012 2:13 PM
You've done it again, Connie Schultz. Used words to wake up people. Made me weep for women who are subjected to such degradation. Championed a cause that is a political issue for those whose zealotry has overstepped their bounds in a way that probably makes the leaders of their religions unhappy. Gave me some hope that this inhumane behaviour can be curtailed - and even eliminated! Cheers for the women of the world!
Comment: #2
Posted by: patricia burger
Wed Jan 4, 2012 3:44 PM
Enjoyed your article today. I've never seen this country in such turmoil, and I'm in my mid-70's. It truly doesn't make sense that so many males are becoming more aggressive toward females in all countries. After women have fought so hard to gain what ground we have, and now be antagonized by those who still consider us property, ignorant, unimportant, only child bearers etc. is unconscionable to grasp in 2012.
My hope is the younger, upcoming men 45 and younger who seem to have educated themselves about women and the issues of their mothers, sisters,peers, etc.
I also know that women all over this world will not be pushed down anymore...they have breathed the air of being self-fulfilled and supported by their sisters all over this world.
Keep up the wonderful writing you do for our enjoyment...continued success.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Carol Kern
Wed Jan 4, 2012 4:52 PM
Yes. Yes! YES! Connie, your voice is my voice. Thank you!
Comment: #4
Posted by: Cil Knutsen
Wed Jan 4, 2012 6:42 PM
Yes. Yes! YES! Connie, your voice is my voice. Thank you!
Comment: #5
Posted by: Cil Knutsen
Wed Jan 4, 2012 6:42 PM
I have missed you in the paper, glad to have found you again. Thank you for your committment to women and justice.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Marlane Weslian
Wed Jan 4, 2012 9:25 PM
Connie,
I am amazed that I have been sitting at my desk with similar info in front of me for the past weeks while i wondered how I address it. As one who works on justice for women, there are times I am overwhelmed by the ongoing treatment of women here and around the world. I share your hope - that we will find the ways together to make this a world that respects women fully - in all cultures, in all religions, in all places. When women come together, we discover more commonality than difference. We must come together.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Loey Powell
Thu Jan 5, 2012 8:37 AM
While I agree with most of your points, I would like to remind you that there is more than one person involved in any decision regarding abortion. Even when the biological father is out of the picture for one of the many reasons that could happen, the woman is not the only life that is affected. There are many babies who could have been born healthy and then adopted who are killed. This is what I perceive to be the objection of many anti-abortion groups. I do understand that not all of these groups are as enlightened, and some are downright dangerous to the civil liberties of women. But I am getting the impression that you think that being against abortions is being against women. I hope I am mistaken. Historically, abortion has been used a a means to oppress women, and is still used as such in Communist China. Please don't tar all anti-abortion folks with the same brush!
Comment: #8
Posted by: Joyce Baskind
Thu Jan 5, 2012 9:41 AM
Great article. The PD is just not the same without you - it has lost its spunk. I'm so happy to be able to follow you once again. Keep 'em coming.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Beckie Galvin
Thu Jan 5, 2012 2:23 PM
While I agree that women are discriminated against, are considered the spoils of war, are targeted by males full of rage who think they should possess/own women, I can only wonder about the discrimination of women against women.

Why aren't women having the girl babies and aborting the boy babies? Until boys and girls are aborted equally, I would have to say that maybe this discussion should have been left out of your article. I was with you until you started in on abortion. That is not the only (and in my opinion is far less important) issue facing women.
Comment: #10
Posted by: Susan Arnold
Thu Jan 5, 2012 3:38 PM
Connie,
Your article is so timely and important. Thank you for your strong voice. We must work to turn your words into action around the world. Jan Roller
Comment: #11
Posted by: Jan Roller
Fri Jan 6, 2012 11:47 AM
Thank you, Connie. Here in New York City, I've also noticed more young women at pro-choice rallies. Your rallying cry made me weep.

Barbara Elovic
Comment: #12
Posted by: Barbara Elovic
Sun Jan 8, 2012 7:12 AM
I commend your fight to keep women safe,healthy, and educated. However, many
feel we have reproductive rights here in america,
with birth control available to all, to me and many others, abortion is another
issue altogether. Not to be confused with reproductive rights.
Comment: #13
Posted by: Diane
Sun Jan 8, 2012 1:42 PM
Abortion is about the right of a woman to control her own body and her own reproduction. Despite several decades' worth of rhetoric from misogynists declaring that if a woman just kept her legs closed she'd never have an unwanted pregnancy, the truth is that a man's reproductive choice begins and ends at whether he keeps his pants zipped. Once there's a pregnancy, the man's not physically involved anymore; he can't get pregnant and can't give birth, and just as he can't choose open-heart surgery for his wife if she's competent to make the decision, neither can he choose whether his partner in reproduction remains pregnant. (Even less so if she's not married to him. Ohio does not even allow a single father primary custody of the child absent a court ruling otherwise after the birth.)
Adoption has nothing to do with abortion. The choice to surrender a child for adoption comes after the woman has already chosen to carry to term and is employed as an alternative to parenting, not as an alternative to abortion. It has become quite obvious to me that anti-abortion groups push adoption because they are somehow in bed with the adoption industry. I cannot otherwise explain why "pro-life" groups are not simply helping women with crisis pregnancies get the help they need to parent successfully. The only organization I know of that even tries is Birthright and I'm not sure how sincere their efforts are.
And here's the thing? We have no shortage of children to adopt in the state of Ohio. There are lots and lots of children in foster care who desperately need permanent homes. But God forbid anyone not be able to pretend they gave birth to the child; God forbid anyone ever adopt a stranger's child who has physical and mental problems. (As a former friend of mine once said to me: "Don't I have the right to adopt a child I can handle?" I thought, "You don't know much about raising kids, do you?") No, they'd rather participate in infant trafficking. And make no mistake, that's exactly what it is. And for what? For the baby to be removed from the only family it's ever known, to have its entire identity and family history erased and for it to be reduced to second-class citizenship. If the adoption happens too long after the relinquishment, there will be problems with obtaining passports and security clearances later in life. If the adopted adult wants to know their family history they will not be allowed to look up their own birth certificate. If the adopted adult wants to know their original family they will be guilt-tripped by their adoptive parents and the rest of society. For what? So someone can pretend they gave birth to a baby. Adoption is the only circumstance I know of in which legal documents can be falsified. Adoption's the only legal circumstance I know of in which people are bought and sold in this country (although it's disguised as "payment for adoption services"). And women are used as baby farms and then cast aside when their work is done, and regularly vilified in the media as unstable and unfit even though they had never, in fact, been tested as mothers or found wanting.
You can keep your "adoption as an option." You have ample opportunities to pursue adoption if that is what you really want. There are children waiting. Leave women, our pregnancies, and our babies ALONE.
Comment: #14
Posted by: Dana
Thu Jan 12, 2012 6:20 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

25 Jun 2008 Seeing a Human Face in a Human Right

1 Jun 2008 It's Time for a New Metaphor for War

23 Jul 2008 Customers Have a Bottom Line, Too