creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
23 May 2012
Catholic Leaders Must Dial Down the Rhetoric

As a non-Catholic, I wrestled with an internal conflict over the birth control battle of the bishops. Part of … Read More.

16 May 2012
Dear Young Mothers: Ignore Time Magazine

In February 1989, I ended a phone interview for a magazine story I was writing and looked up to find my 21-month-… Read More.

9 May 2012
Finally, the President Says 'I Do'

This was going to be a different kind of column. My friend Jackie, through a mutual contact, arranged for me … Read More.

Once Again, It's About Choice

Share Comment

Sixty-year-old Sandy grew up in poverty. When she started talking about her childhood in Cleveland, her voice shifted into present tense.

"I'm the third of four girls, and we're all wearing donated clothes," she said over coffee last week. "We never know where the clothes are coming from. By the time they get to me, they're in rags.

"Every piece of clothing has somebody else's name in it, because the schools make you do that, you know, label all of your stuff. So I have to write my name under theirs."

She paused for a moment.

"Everybody knows," she said. "Everybody knows you're wearing somebody's old clothes. Nothing ever matches up. Your friends say, 'How come you're wearing the same skirt again? Don't you have another sweater?'

"Zippers are always broken, so you're using a bunch of safety pins to keep your skirt closed, your pants closed. You try to cover it with a sweater or a jacket. You turn wrong, the wind blows, and everyone sees the pins."

She takes a deep breath, finally switches to past tense.

"One time, when I was in seventh grade, I walked into school wearing a dress that was too tight. It had a hole under the arm. I wore an old sweater to cover it up. I looked like such a mess.

"I didn't make it to first period. I looked down at myself and thought, 'I can't pull this off. I can't do it today.'"

She told school officials she was sick and walked home.

"A popular boy asked me out once," she said. "I didn't go out with him, because I knew I wouldn't have a second outfit if he asked me again."

Sandy asked that I not use her full name because she didn't want to embarrass relatives. I asked to meet with her after she sent an email in response to my column about Michigan state Sen. Bruce Caswell, who had proposed that foster children be forced to buy used clothes with their meager government stipends.

Public outrage to Caswell's comments was swift. Within days, he had backpedaled. A statement on his website reads, in part:

"After a suggestion from a constituent, (Caswell) plans to draft an amendment to the proposal that would direct the state to work with major retailers to create a gift card program that would ensure the clothing allowance money only purchases clothing and shoes at their stores.

...

"'My sole goal in this proposal is to make sure that children receive the clothing allowance that the state has provided for them and not have it used for anything else,' said Caswell. ... 'If anyone else has a better idea on how we can ensure the money goes for clothing alone, I very much welcome those suggestions and urge you to share your ideas with me. I appreciate the input I have already received that has resulted in making the proposal better.'"

Some readers argued that Caswell's initial proposal was dead-on. There's nothing wrong with thrift shops, they said.

True enough. No one said there is.

Some said they like to shop at stores like Goodwill and The Salvation Army. Why not? When our youngest daughter was a teenager, she used to love using her baby-sitting money to shop for used clothes.

The difference is in having the option. If you voluntarily buy used clothes, it's a choice. If you are forced to do so and they are the only clothes you wear, it's a humiliation. And the pain can last a lifetime.

When Sandy graduated from high school, she immediately got a job that allowed her to buy the braces she desperately needed — and the new clothes she always had wanted. She's been married for 40 years.

"I have two sons," Sandy said. "I was sure to name them so they had the same initials, just in case they ever had to wear each other's clothes. And I always bought them the right size for their age. None of this 'growing into it' stuff. I didn't ever want them to be embarrassed like I was, to be judged by other kids like I was."

Before we parted, Sandy assured me that she does occasionally shop at thrift stores.

"You know, for furniture or vases," she said, smiling. "At the hospice resale shop or the (American Cancer Society's) Discovery Shop. Places like that."

Ever buy clothes there? I asked.

Her face fell.

"No, not clothes," she said. "Never clothes."

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and an essayist for Parade magazine. To find out more about Connie Schultz (cschultz@plaind.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
It'd be nice if we could ever abandon the attitude -- held by people who have never in their life had to worry about having clothes, or a meal, or a roof -- that poor people are lesser people; that it must be their own fault. I really think that's what's behind Caswell's callousness.

In the summer of 2008, I voted for John Edwards in the primaries because he was the only candidate talking about poor Americans. (Didn't turn out well.)
Comment: #1
Posted by: Steven Doyle
Sun May 1, 2011 5:48 AM
I couldn't finish this article. It was just too sad. And the greedy republicans want to make it even harder on these people. It's down right criminal. Please fix this problem. Enough of this sadness.
Comment: #2
Posted by: William Newman
Mon May 2, 2011 4:44 AM
This lady and her near brain dead husband, the senior senator from Ohio, Sherrod Brown, are a great team. She publishes pap and he votes for pap. These two haven't done anything right since they wed. By marrying each other, they saved two defenseless other folks from a life with them. Their barometric leftism makes it easy to see what is good and what is bad. If these two are for it, it is almost a certainty that it is wrong. If they are against it, the opposite holds true.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Jobe
Mon May 2, 2011 8:26 AM
I don't think anyone should have to be poor or live poor, but honestly, the clothes you buy new are a mess. Can't fix or replace a zipper? Then clothes are disposable in a year. Can't sew up a hem? Make that six months. I've bought expensive things that started to fall apart after very little wear.

Most women's clothes are poorly made and they don't keep you warm. They fade. They don't fit. They fall apart after a few washings. Anything that even makes it to a resale store is probably a better garment, on average, than many new clothes.

I grew up poor. Now I'm well off, and I still often shop in thrift stores--because I often prefer the clothes to the sleazy new things the well-named "rag trade" has to offer. Don't knock the Sally Ann. They have a lot to offer.
Comment: #4
Posted by:
Mon May 2, 2011 8:48 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

3 May 2009 Broadcasting 911 Calls Is Crucial -- Sometimes

21 Aug 2007 Sweet 16 and Never Heard No

15 Oct 2008 Working Class Matters