creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
23 May 2012
Catholic Leaders Must Dial Down the Rhetoric

As a non-Catholic, I wrestled with an internal conflict over the birth control battle of the bishops. Part of … Read More.

16 May 2012
Dear Young Mothers: Ignore Time Magazine

In February 1989, I ended a phone interview for a magazine story I was writing and looked up to find my 21-month-… Read More.

9 May 2012
Finally, the President Says 'I Do'

This was going to be a different kind of column. My friend Jackie, through a mutual contact, arranged for me … Read More.

Ohio -- The New Texas

Share Comment

Last week, bartender Keleigh Rae Bowling had to interrupt a drunken couple having sex on the Skee-Ball table where she works.

"Everybody can see you," she told them calmly but in a voice that made clear who was in charge. "You're going to have to leave."

So they did.

After they trashed one of the bar's bathrooms.

So there.

If the Ohio General Assembly decides to allow pistol-packing patrons to saddle up to the bar, Bowling is done breaking up entanglements, violent or otherwise.

First, a little background on Bowling: She started serving drinks for a living when she was a student at Baldwin-Wallace College, where she earned both her bachelor's and master's degrees. She's 42 now, and she works at two bars in the Cleveland area, one of which is also a restaurant.

When it comes to bad behavior, the 5-foot-9-inch veteran bartender has seen it all and broken up a lot of it. She sees it as part of her job.

"It's a myth that a lot of people get angry when they drink," she said. "But a lot of them do lose control, and that's when I'm supposed to step in."

She's a strong woman, but she's nobody's fool.

"If Ohio allows customers to walk in with concealed weapons, how am I going to know if they're armed? What if they're wearing an ankle holster? What am I supposed to do, pat them down?"

Why is Keleigh Rae Bowling asking these questions?

For that, all eyes turn to Columbus — the new Texas.

Last week, the Republican majority in the Ohio Senate sent another valentine to far-right extremists trying to take the state hostage. This latest stunt was a nibble on the neck of the National Rifle Association.

The bill — which also was supported by Democrats Capri Cafaro, Jason Wilson and Joe Schiavoni — would allow people with concealed carry permits to wear hidden weapons in bars, restaurants and open-air stadiums that serve alcohol.

Settle down, you rational people. Understand that the bill would allow these establishments to post signs saying, "Oh, no, you don't." That doesn't mean they wouldn't — bring in guns, that is. But there I go again, quibbling.

At the risk of sounding like a worn-out 45, let me start by acknowledging that this is yet another bill in Ohio's General Assembly that has nothing to do with the jobs, the jobs, the jobs they promised during last year's campaign.

Supporters of the bill like to point out that anyone carrying a weapon and drinking alcohol could face felony charges.

Solves everything, they say.

Aaron Marshall, a colleague of mine at The Plain Dealer, quoted the bill's sponsor, state Sen. Tim Schaffer:

"I agree that you shouldn't be mixing alcohol and guns," he said. "This bill doesn't allow concealed carry permit holders to consume alcohol. Period."

Fascinating.

Who are all these gun-toting, barhopping teetotalers? I've lived in Ohio all of my life. How did I miss these guys?

More importantly, how would Ohio's bars, restaurants and open-air stadiums figure out who's carrying the secret weapons? And who would intervene if the gunslingers were to decide to violate the law and down a Dortmunder? Tip a tequila? Sip a Seagram's?

We all know the answer to these questions, which is why none of the bill's supporters wants to discuss enforcement. I don't blame them.

Why would any elected official want to admit he or she wants to shift the burden of law enforcement onto hourly wage earners running themselves ragged to make a living as waiters, waitresses and bartenders? Who in their right minds would say out loud that hardworking people like Keleigh Rae Bowling should risk their safety — maybe their lives — to take on a heartland hustler who's decided he's just exceptional enough to break the law and take on Miss Kitty, too?

It should surprise no one that the Ohio Restaurant Association and various law enforcement groups oppose the bill, which now is headed to the Ohio House of Representatives.

It's also predictable that Tim Grendell — the state senator who ran for the House and then decided to keep his old job after he won — would think he's the voice of reason. Grendell stood on the Senate floor and insisted we all just need to have a little faith in the good intentions of heat-packing Buckeyes who want to walk into a place where alcohol flows like the roiling Mohican.

"There is no reason that trust ends when you walk into a bar or a restaurant," Grendell said, sounding like the lead singer in a country western band.

And I love country music, so you can imagine the embarrassment.

As a Buckeye, I mean.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and an essayist for Parade magazine. To find out more about Connie Schultz (cschultz@plaind.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

8 Comments | Post Comment
I've never read Schultz's column before and won't read it again. Her writing oozes with liberal vitriol. Under current laws, only the "bad guys" are packing. Citizens with concealed carry permits have already been vetted by the authorities. But, then again, CCW permit holders are already law abiding citizens and limiting where they may legally carry their weapons continues to tip the scales in the favor of the criminals. But wait, isn't that the stuff liberals' dreams are made of?
Comment: #1
Posted by: TDM
Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:48 AM
Connie my dear........you're missing one very important matter......not knowing who's armed is precisely the thing that will be most beneficial.

I know, I know, the notion of an armed, mean, pissed off drunk with a gun in a bar is a frightening thought (or anywhere for that matter). But, we all know that there's nothing preventing that from happening already (an idiot with a gun in a bar or a public setting). The average CCW permit holder isn't going to risk their "privilege" by getting crocked at the local bar in possession of their weapon, the idiot who's irresponsibly carrying is already there (by definition these folks don't give a rat's ass about laws).

So, the fact that it's possible that others (law abiding CCW permitees) are armed at the bar will in all likelihood prevent idiots from acting out evil intentions; at least a real opportunity to stop an evil act will be more likely. This would actually make me much more comfortable in a bar setting as compared to the option of calling law enforcement in to handle a "situation." I've been there and done that and it doesn't work out very well for the "innocent bystanders". The notion that "rational" CCW folks, or for that matter others, are potentially armed in a public setting, will more likely reduce the risk of a gun toting drunk acting on thier evil intentions.

It sucks, but that's the world we live in and anyone who can't embrace the idea of self protection is a Wimp.

(Note: the view described herein are solely those of Mike Matull).

Mike
Comment: #2
Posted by: Mike Matull
Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:59 AM
For TDM:
Don't quit reading "liberal vitriol." Yeah, it's sometimes frustrating, but there's no better way to "know thy enemy;" and I say this with the utmost respect because one of the things that make this country great is that you can still legally speak in disagreement with views that you don't like or believe.
This is one such area.......the idea that we should let the "gubmint" protect us from ourselves. I guess if this notion were true I'd have less of a problem with it, but we know it's not, and never likely to be.
Liberal thinking tends to support the notion that we should have a society where firearms (and the right to self protection) are carefully controlled by the goverment. This usually manifest in a line of questioning like "why do you NEED the right to self protection with a gun?" The problem I have is that it's not about NEED, it's about WANT, asnd wanting vs. needing is a key element of true freedom.
When we get to a point that the Gubmit will decide all that we NEED, I'm sincerly hoping someone will stab me in the head with a butter knife (If you can still get one). :)
Mike
Comment: #3
Posted by: Mike Matull
Sun Apr 17, 2011 11:18 AM
barhopping teetotalers.. are called designated drivers..

Do you think you are safer.. or not safer when it is only criminals who will bring concealed weapons into bars?

Maybe you ought to make yourself more conversant with firearm skills.. so you are not so unreasonably scared of them?

Comment: #4
Posted by: qhgirl
Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:54 AM
Connie, do you have any facts whatsoever to back up your fears? It's not like this is without precedent. Are there any statistics to show that carrying concealed (LICENSED) weapons in bars & stadiums has caused an increase in violent crime in Texas? Why didn't you cite a single solid fact? (I'm guessing it's because none of them supported your theory.)
Comment: #5
Posted by: Kim
Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:59 AM
Wow! Has Ohio lost it's mind!? Pardon me for disagreeing with the majority here but I work in Alaska's only maximum security prison and I can't begin to tell you how many men (suffice it to say that it is a large number) we have here that are serving life sentences for mixing guns and alcohol.

I have read prisoner file, after prisoner file describing how someone ended up dead because someone else (the prisoner) was drunk and armed with a gun. Never have I read that a shooting occurred in a bar (yet anyhow). The reason for that, I strongly believe, is because in Alaska it is illegal to carry a gun into a bar, concealed or otherwise.

If the comments here are to be believed, i.e., that all the bad guys will still carry guns into bars, then why is it that that isn't happening here? I mean Alaska is the "last frontier" after all.

I think the reason for our lack of fatallities in bars, due to shootings, is because of the laws we have in place. Unfortunately, there is no law against drinking in your own home where you may have a gun or 20.

I couldn't tell you how many guns I own personally, right off the top of my head. Let's just say more than one but less than 20. I have some catching up to do in that department. I am also a woman and I conceal carry practicailly everywhere, even to church. I don't, however, carry my weapon into any establishment that serves alcohol because it's ILLEGAL. And I hope it always stays that way in Alaska.
Comment: #6
Posted by: corinne
Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:38 PM
Connie;
I love to read your column and usually don't agree. But you write well and I like to read and consider others points of view. Sometimes I learn something. I am a gun owner and hunter in a neighboring state, have been to both Iraq and Afghanistan. I have "packed heat" both wearing the uniform of my country and for self defense. I have learned 2 things about this subject: Firearms and booze (and kids) DON'T MIX. Period. And Americans watch WAY TOO much television. I see it when I go to the firing range and watch some guy with an automatic that was meant for 1 thing holding the damn thing wrong because he saw it in a movie. If you aren't a vet or a policeman, take a course people. And If you are going to drink or don't expect trouble leave the weapon AT HOME. Locked. In a cabinet. Away from the ammunition, with a trigger lock. And turn the TV off. Real violence is not glamorous or glorious. It is scary and it sucks and is usually stupid. Keeping guns out of bars also protects the gun owner from doing something stupid he will regret the rest of his life. No guns in bars!
Comment: #7
Posted by: random access
Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:57 PM
You bring up some good points, random access, you're right about keeping guns away from kids. We had a young man in our institution whose parents bought him a gun for his 15th birthday but apparently didn't bother with making sure he took a class that would have taught him the four rules of gun safety and proper handling. While showing off his birthday present to his best friend he shot and killed him.

If properly schooled, about appropriate gun handling, I don't think 15 years old is too young but if completely clueless it is.

Another point you mentioned is the improper handling of guns due to what people have seen on TV and in movies. I've seen the same thing, numerous times, and it scares the crap out of me.
Comment: #8
Posted by: corinne
Tue Apr 19, 2011 1:36 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

27 Apr 2008 The Right To Be Young

5 Jun 2011 We Are What We Choose To See

10 Jul 2007 Women's Fixation on Trophy Wife Shows They're No Prizes Themselves